|
ÇáÌÒíÑÉ
News
Archives
Arab
Cartoonists
Columnists
Documents
Editorials
Opinion
Editorials
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
News
Photos
Peace
Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Public
Activities
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
Partition
is Not the Answer, Roger H Lieberman
"Horrible as the
present situation is on the ground in Palestine, it is made worse still
by the inability of the Israeli “peace camp” to come to grips with
the crisis..."
By Roger H Lieberman
PalestineChronicle.com
Today, in the middle of the occupied West Bank, miles to the east of
Israel’s pre-1967 frontier, the Israeli Offense Force is busy erecting
an encircling monstrosity of concrete, barbed wire, and guard towers.
Completely, utterly illegal by anyone’s definition, it is rarely even
mentioned in the Western press – except, occasionally, in Orwellian
new-speak, as Israel’s new “security fence”.
Like some gargantuan gray boa constrictor, it slithers though the West
Bank – engulfing thousands of acres of fertile farmland, alienating
tens of thousands of Palestinians from land their families have tilled
for centuries, and strangling every last drop of vitality out of what
was once the lovely land of Palestine.
In a provocative report by Ran HaCohen, published by Antiwar.com
(5/21/03), the ghastly specifics of the wall project are laid bare. When
completed, this ugly barrier will stand 8 meters in height, and run a
meandering length totaling nearly 1000 kilometers. It will break up the
West Bank into two strangulated enclaves – one in the north
encompassing Ramallah, Nablus, and Jenin, one in the south around Hebron
– and permit Israel to unilaterally annex huge swaths of land between
them. The entire Jordan valley, East Jerusalem, and a large, verdant
area south of Tulkarm and Qalqilya are to be swallowed by the Zionist
State as part of “Greater Israel”.
What will be left to the Palestinian Arabs, according to Sharon’s
scheme, amounts to less than 50 percent of the 22 percent of historical
Palestine that Israel seized in 1967, and upon which the Palestinian
leadership had hoped to establish an independent state. What this means,
in human terms, is that 3 and a half million men, women, and children
will be imprisoned – permanently, Israel hopes – within one-tenth of
their original homeland. Desperately short on water and food, deprived
of virtually all means of earning a living, and languishing in the slow
death of crowded ghettos and refugee camps. To compare this nightmare to
the notorious bantustans of Apartheid South Africa is, if anything, to
give the Israelis an unwarranted COMPLIMENT!
Horrible as the present situation is on the ground in Palestine, it is
made worse still by the inability of the Israeli “peace camp” to
come to grips with the crisis, and understand what the times demand of
them. Indeed, most members of the utterly useless Labor Party –
including “Mr. Generosity” Ehud Barak – have warmly endorsed
Sharon’s Ethnic Cleansing Wall. The more “liberal” members of
Sharon’s “opposition” may argue for a change or two in the
wall’s sinuous path – for a “kinder, gentler” apartheid – but
nothing more. The idea that Palestinians are full human beings who must
be treated as brothers seems too difficult for most of the “voices of
conscience” in the Near East’s “only democracy” to grasp. Even a
genuinely descent, peace-seeking Jewish American leader, Rabbi Michael
Lerner, clings to the “two-state solution” like a preschooler to a
security blanket, hoping somehow this defunct idea could produce the
reconciliation between Jews and Arabs he sincerely hopes for.
Why should we, the people whose job it is to roll back the present
floodtide of racism and imperialism, stymie our own struggle by wrapping
ourselves in the two-state ideological straightjacket? There is no moral
defense for carving Palestine into Jewish and Arab “states”, any
more than there is for dismembering America into a “white state” and
a “black state”, or a “Protestant state” and a “Catholic
state”. Such notions of statehood tied to ethnicity and religion are
our vile inheritance from old Europe’s obsession with racial
“purity” – a pathology that spawned two World Wars, the Holocaust,
and the more recent horrors in Bosnia and Kosovo as well. But we who
inhabit the world of the 21st Century need not be prisoners of this dark
past. We, in America, learned long ago that a nation must be a state for
its citizens, not just for one privileged, or “chosen”, group.
The only bright future for Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs lies in
the establishment of a single, democratic state, where all are equal
before the law. The prime objective of the peace movement must not be a
vain attempt to erect some more “equitable” barrier in
Palestine-Israel, but in bringing all the inhabitants of this land
closer together. This can only be achieved by dismantling every
discriminatory law governing ownership of land, employment, political
representation, and immigration. There is a logical first step in the
process of building democracy – the dissolution of the present Israeli
government, followed by free elections open to all inhabitants of the
West Bank and Gaza, as well as pre-1967 Israel. That is the paramount
political goal for which we must campaign tirelessly.
A great deal depends upon the Palestinians’ forging friendship with
Israeli Jews who share their commitment to liberty and justice. Indeed,
slowly but surely, support for binationalism is gaining strength on both
sides of the “Green Line”. Most Palestinian Arabs have long
recognized that the rich, cosmopolitan history of their land sets a
positive precedent for the integration of Jews, Moslems, and Christians
in a modern democracy. And some courageous Israelis, sick at heart with
the crimes committed by their government in their name, are
rediscovering the lost voice to Jewish humanism – the voice of Martin
Buber, Albert Einstein, and Judah Magnes, all eloquent advocates of
binationalism in their time.
We remember well the joyous scenes of November 1989, when the Berlin
Wall – once the intractable symbol of the Cold War – succumbed to
the power of human freedom. We can only hope that Ariel Sharon’s wall
will soon meet the same fate, crumbling into so much debris, while the
cheers of Palestinians and Israelis rediscovering their brotherhood fill
a moonlit night.
*Roger H. Lieberman is a senior at Rutgers University, in New Brunswick,
New Jersey, majoring in Geology.
|
|
 |
| Earth, a planet
hungry for peace |
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers
(Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03). |
|
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in
the West Bank (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03). |
|
|