|
الجزيرة
News
Archives
Arab
Cartoonists
Columnists
Documents
Editorials
Opinion
Editorials
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
News
Photos
Peace
Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Public
Activities
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
A
License to Kill Civilians,
Shulamit Aloni
Ha’aretz, pmc
Despite international laws
against the killing of civilians, the Israeli Supreme Court has ruled
that the use of flechette shells is permissible within urban areas
In its decision of April 27, Israel’s highest court has essentially
issued a license to kill civilians by determining that the use of
flechette shells fired from tanks is not prohibited by international
law. The court has thereby done its duty by the occupation army, which
uses flechette rounds in densely populated areas. The High Court of
Justice (?)** knows that the killing of civilians is banned by
international law and every other human law; that, evidently, didn’t
bother the court.
Flechette shells, in regular use by the IDF in densely populated
Palestinian residential areas, spread out over an area with an average
radius of 200 meters and cause mortal injury to civilians -- to women,
men, children and old people, with no distinction whatever -- by
scattering small, lethal metal darts. The supreme court, which at first
scorned even to hear the petition on the grounds that it amounted to a
demand to dictate to the IDF the means it could employ, forgot that its
task is to protect human life.
In relying on the idea that flechette rounds fired from tanks are not
prohibited by international law, the court has entirely ignored the
spirit of the law. The judges found grounds to permit, or more precisely
did not find grounds to forbid [use of this weapon in this manner], as
if the impermissible could be made permissible. The fact that these
shells have killed women sitting in a tent, or in another instance
killed three young people, made no impression on the High Court of
Justice. Just as the court was not impressed when one-ton bombs fell out
of the sky over a crowded residential area because the army sought to
exterminate a wanted man and, in the process, killed “only” his wife
along with him.
The president of the supreme court, Justice Aharon Barak, once declared
that everything is justiciable; except [the behavior of] the IDF,
apparently. So the lives, dignity, property and rights of Palestinians
may be trampled. Palestinians can be abused, robbed, tortured and
killed, and there’s no court to offer justice to these people or to
rein in the killing and the horror: not the supreme court, and certainly
not the judge advocate general’s office, which knows just what to
ignore, where to bestow immunity and whom to hound to the bitter end.
I don’t think the supreme court justices have become jaded, but it
appears to me that they feel themselves menaced by certain reckless
members of Knesset who are trying to gnaw away at the authority of the
court, as well as by a regime headed by three generals (the prime
minister, the former chief of staff who is now defense minister, and the
current chief of staff), all of them battle-happy right-wingers who are
close to the settlers and the advocates of ethnic cleansing, if not
their active partners.
I write these words with great sadness and shame, because it’s not the
case that our army is “the most moral army in the world.” In the
name of the war against terror, acts of terror, acts of intolerable
piracy and humiliation, are being committed. For a society with
pretensions to democracy and humanism, when there’s no court with the
courage to stand firm under fire, the next stop is the International
Court at The Hague.
The nonsense that any criticism of us is anti-Semitism, and the
perverted use of references to the Holocaust, while it and its victims
are cheapened, cannot help us when it comes to indefensible deeds. No
justification is to be found there for permitting the firing of
flechette shells from tanks against a civilian population.
It doesn’t strike me as coincidental that the justices of the supreme
court, before sitting in judgment on petitions like these, try to
persuade the petitioners to withdraw their plea. They simply want
nothing to do with the subject, given the popularity of the IDF, the
populism of the present government, and the attacks on the court by
right-wing members of Knesset. The courage has all run dry, apparently,
and the implications demand that we take a very long, hard look at
ourselves.
(Translated from the original Hebrew in “Haaretz,” May 4, 2003)
*Aloni is a former Meretz member of Knesset and cabinet minister
**Translator’s note: The full Hebrew name for Israel’s supreme court
is “The High Court of Justice”; the question mark appears in the
original text.
|
|
|