|
aljazeerah.info Opinion Editorials |
|||
|
Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah Cities, localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
City buildings are the jungles
of Iraq LONDON, 29 March 2003 — Four centuries before Christ, China’s Gen.
Sun-Tzu wrote in his Art of War: “The worst policy is to besiege
cities.” Nearly two and a half thousand years later, the Americans and
British invading Iraq and trapped outside Baghdad and Basra have again
become aware of this. Six months ago, on the first anniversary of the attacks on New York,
Tareq Aziz gave an interview to Dr. Toby Dodge, of the University of
Warwick. Aziz said: “People say to me, you (the Iraqis) are not the
Vietnamese. You have no jungles and swamps to hide in. I reply, let our
cities be our swamps and our buildings our jungles.” This interview is cited in Dr. Dodge’s perspicacious and prescient
article, Cake Walk, Coup or Urbanwarfare: the Battle for Iraq, in the
Adelphi Paper No 354, Iraq at the Crossroads, published by the
International Institute for Strategic Studies. Maybe, this time, the
academics got it right. So the Iraqi plan to frustrate and hold the
Americans was clearly well thought out six months ago. As Thomas Ricks, a
Washington Post reporter wrote Wednesday, the unexpectedly bad weather,
long and insecure supply lines stretching 300 miles and surprising Iraqi
resistance have led to a “broad reassessment of timelines”. In other
words, a longer and harder war than was expected a week ago. An operational pause is in the offing. The 3rd US Infantry Division (Mechanised)
is a relatively small force (though more than double the size of even the
best-appointed Iraqi division), more than 300 miles from its base. Its 100
Apache helicopters, its main hi-tech, anti-armor assets, are grounded by
sandstorms. It is even having emergency supplies of water and food trucked
in from Kuwait. The logistics people in their soft-skinned vehicles are
probably even braver than the front-line soldiers. And they are the people
the Iraqis, striking at the vulnerable supply lines, will go for. Senior
US officers were cited as saying the 3rd Division must “run out of steam
soon”. A sobering thought, if true. The US and British commanders must be concerned about the cities they
never wanted to besiege. Baghdad has a population of five million. Najaf,
the main jumping-off point for an attack on the capital, has 600,000.
Basra has 1.5 million. That is the same population as Northern Ireland.
The British have still not brought total peace to Northern Ireland after
having deployed, on average, 17,000 troops there, for nearly 34 years. If
the main Iraqi cities do not come over to the allies, and so far they have
not, we face a very different strategic problem — the one we faced on
the outbreak of war more than a week ago. And the southcentral Iraqi theater will be the operational area of the
US 4th Infantry Division (Mechanised). Its heavy equipment is in 35 ships
heading for Kuwait from the Mediterranean via the Suez. The division,
originally intended to strike Iraq’s northern front through Turkey, will
not be be ready until April. In southern Iraq, where resistance has been far tougher than expected,
its appearance will, nevertheless, be hugely welcome. As one retired US
general said: “I wouldn’t like to go into Baghdad before I had another
division up into my rear.” That can only be 4th Division, and it will
not be there until next month. In the interim, 3rd Infantry’s long and vulnerable supply lines,
attacked by Iraqi stay-behind parties, can be reinforced only by the 82nd
Airborne Division, based near Kuwait City, and the 101st, who are, to
quote The Washington Post, “deep inside Iraq”. Part of one US airborne
brigade, the 173rd, dropped to hold an airfield an hour’s drive north of
Irbil on Wednesday night. Quite why the Americans felt they had to drop 1,000 men by parachute 50
miles behind the front line in safe, secure, Kurdish territory to an
airfield on which they were already landing helicopters is unclear. It could only have impressed the Western media. There is no way it
could have impressed Iraqis. The British Paras don’t parachute if there
is an airfield to land on, and some of them were not impressed, either.
But it made good TV in the absence of much other good news. Over the past 24 hours, the overwhelming lesson has, again, been: Be
skeptical. On Wednesday night and Thursday morning there were reports of a
huge Iraqi armored force — 1,000 vehicles, about a brigade — trying to
cut off the vulnerable US main supply route, and of the breakout of an
Iraqi battle group — 120 tanks — from Basra down into the Al-Faw
Peninsula. In the cold light of dawn, the great brigade counter-sweep dissolved.
The battle group was shot up by well-prepared US and British armor,
artillery and air power.
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.
|