Opinion, June 2003, Al-Jazeerah.info

 

ÇáÌÒíÑÉ

News Archive

Arab Cartoons

Columnists

Documents

Editorials 

Opinion Editorials

letters to the editor

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Islam

Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people 

Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

News Photo

Peace Activists

Poetry

Book reviews

Public Announcements 

   Public Activities 

Women in News

Cities, localities, and tourist attractions

 

 

 

Settlements and Israel's quagmire

 By Sherri Muzher

 
Jordan Times, 6/29/03   
No matter how one looks at it, Israeli settlements are leading the Israelis to a nightmare. If they get rid of the settlements, there is the likelihood that a civil war with Jewish settlers will start. If they don't get rid of the settlements, bi-nationalism becomes a reality and the Jewish character of Israel dissipates.

And last weekend, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon apparently told the Israeli Cabinet that Israel can continue settlement building in the Palestinian territories as long as the construction is not celebrated.

“... just build”, is how Sharon was quoted in Israel's Haaretz.

Sharon's defiance came at a delicate time in the roadmap to peace and followed a proposal by National Infrastructures Minister Yosef Paritzky to move Jewish settlers from the West Bank to lightly populated areas of Israel.

Sharon has to consider the feelings of Jewish settlers who are key supporters. And for many Jewish settlers, being in the West Bank is a religious duty. Consider the 400 heavily-armed settlers who live among 130,000 Palestinians in Hebron. The settlers believe that they are entitled to Hebron because Abraham, the ancient patriarch of Arabs and Jews, bought a cave in what is now Hebron as a burial place for his Jewish wife, Sarah, about 4,000 years ago. Some even insist that the settlements are needed for security reasons, even though the colonies arguably have cultivated more hatred.

But it was Sharon himself who declared the true aim of the settlements when he once urged: “Everyone has to move, run, and grab as many hilltops as you can to enlarge the settlements, because everything we take now will stay ours ...” Indeed, Sharon and other supporters of Israeli settlements are correct that a viable Palestinian Arab state cannot be established west of the River Jordan.

The settlements and the exclusively Jewish bypass roads leading up to the settlements have left Palestinian areas looking like Swiss cheese. However, it is doubtful that settlement supporters are thinking about the erasure of the Green Line and the resulting one-state solution, whereby Palestinians and Israelis live together in one state.

As Middle East expert Stephen P. Cohen of the Israel Policy Forum acknowledged in the fall of 2002, “you now have a Jewish state on both sides of the Green Line, one where there is a Jewish majority and one where there is a Jewish minority ruling an Arab majority”.

The reality is that Israeli settlements have long been recognised as a thorn in the side of Middle East peace. They've been referred to as war crimes by the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Rene Kosirnik, since the Geneva Convention forbids resettling individuals on occupied lands. Even President Ronald Reagan proposed a peace plan in 1982 that required freezing such settlements. “The immediate adoption of a settlement freeze by Israel, more than any other action, could create the confidence needed,” Reagan said.

Twenty years later, the settlement building continues, and leaders from both Labour and Likud have never taken a reprieve since occupying the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. In fact, there was more settlement building under former Prime Minister Ehud Barak than there was under his right-wing predecessor Benjamin Netanyahu, according to Israel's Peace Now. Barak — often credited for his “generous” offer to the Palestinians at Camp David — clearly reneged on prior declarations of freezing settlement expansion. He actually wanted to maintain 80 per cent of these settlements in any final peace agreement.

According to Israel's Peace Now, almost 40,000 houses have been built since the 1993 Oslo accords.

And so, Sharon pushes forward with the settlement policy. Each defiant statement and edifice is adding to Israel's quagmire. To illustrate the dilemma that Israel has created for itself, consider comments to the AP by one Yosi Peli, a settler from the Yitzhar settlement and recent evictee of the Mitzpeh Yitzhar outpost: “Regarding violence between Jewish settlers and Israeli army soldiers, `when someone is trying to take you from your home it's difficult to know what will be'.”

The Palestinians can make the same statement; now, however, it is time for Sharon to behave like a statesman and make the tough decisions necessary for peace.

The writer is a media analyst and writer for Middle East Affairs in Mason, MI. She contributed this article to The Jordan Times.



 

 
Earth, a planet hungry for peace

 

The Israeli apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03).
The Israeli apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in the West Bank (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03).

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.

editor@aljazeerah.info