|
aljazeerah.info Opinion Editorials |
|||
|
Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah Cities, localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
Anger, Disillusionment
Palpable in Arab World, David Lamb,
LA Times CAIRO, 16 April 2003 — On the calendar of the Middle East’s
defining moments, Arabs have entered a new date: April 8, 2003, the day
the United States entered fabled Baghdad and Saddam Hussein’s vow to
make a heroic stand against invading infidels turned out to be bluster. The images that flashed across millions of television sets from Saudi
Arabia to Morocco were like salt poured into a wound. They inflamed the
pain of humiliation and impotence that haunts the Arab world from past
failure, in war and peace, and make many ask: “Why can’t we stop the
West from imposing its will? Why don’t we have collective power?’’ There was little love for Saddam, but Arabs across the region took
pride in the notion that he would defend Baghdad in the tradition of
Saladin Ayoubi and other great warriors. Then, practically before the
fight had really begun, the defiant Saddam was gone, along with the army.
The sense of deflation and disillusionment in the Arab world was palpable. “The Iraqis are sick,’’ said Fatima Mehio, a Lebanese who used to
live in Iraq, as the jubilation in Baghdad streets turned to looting.
“When they get their health back, maybe they will fight. But right now,
they are completely lost, like all Arabs.’’ With Baghdad’s fall and
the Palestinian intifada continuing, Arabs throughout the region say they
feel besieged and uncertain. They ask, “What’s next?’’ but have no
idea how to respond. Some believe the domino theory that Syria and Iran
are next on the US target list. Many want democratic reform in their
countries, though few believe their leaders will provide it willingly.
Many, feeling betrayed by the trappings of modernity and globalization,
seek refuge at religious places. “America is not going to be content with Iraq,’’ said Mohammed
Sebai, a 32-year-old engineer. If there is anything on which Arabs agree,
it is that the war in Iraq has deepened divisions in the Arab world, fed
the fires of extremism and served as a reminder that nothing worked out
quite as Arabs thought it would when they reveled in the heady days of the
oil bonanza a generation ago. Oil didn’t buy political power. Confrontation with Israel didn’t
bring victory, and peace didn’t bring stability. The Palestinians did
not find statehood, and the democratic movement that swept through Asia,
Africa and Latin America bypassed the Arab world without a glance. “The Arab system is in complete disarray,’’ said Emad Shahin, a
political scientist at American University in Cairo. “Collectively, we
are unable to take decisive or creative action. Our regimes have failed us
so many times even when solutions were clear. Now we see Iraq — civilian
casualties and looting, the American presence, our inability to stop the
war — and it only adds to our sense of frustration.’’ There is a
growing belief here that Arab inaction opened the door for the US-led war
against Iraq. It was, after all, Syria, Jordan and Egypt that helped Saddam break UN
sanctions and that nudged him back into the Arab mainstream, thus
prolonging the regime’s life as well as the continued suffering of the
Iraqi people. It was a suffering that Arab governments mourned mostly when
responsibility could be laid at the US doorstep with the outbreak of war. “Yes, the Arabs should have gotten rid of Saddam themselves,’’
said Hussein Shobokshi, a Saudi businessman. “The Arabs should have
mounted a total push for disarmament. They allowed the genie (Saddam) to
come out of the bottle again’’ after the 1991 Gulf War. With the Arab League balkanized into clusters of states and with the
Arab world having no political or military power center, Arabs are getting
confused. Fundamentalists find the atmosphere today a fertile ground for
recruiting those who feel deluded by their weak leaders and believe the
United States no longer represents worthy values or principles. “People
are angry,’’ said Taher Masri, former prime minister of Jordan. “You go to a rich house, a poor house, the house of an
American-educated man, you find the same thing: An accumulation of anger.
There is a big gap between Arab governments and the people. I think this
is taking dangerous turns. There will be more extremism, more suspicion of
the West. “We, as Arabs, have failed to do many things. The rulers have kept
their tight hold on the populace. Arab rulers have brainwashed their
people, allowing no dissension, no opinions, no democracy. All efforts,
they said, should go to facing the enemy, and the enemy was Israel. “In five years America will not find people like me who are willing
to compromise, who want Western standards, Western ideas, because we as a
people are becoming insulated, introverted, closed.’’ Many US diplomats in the region admit privately they are as dismayed at
Washington’s regional policies as are the Arabs. They say outrage over
the Iraq war and inattention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have made
hard-liners more powerful and dangerous and turned the middle ground into
a caldron of anti-Americanism. Hardly an Arab today would dare defend the
US invasion of Iraq because, as one editor put it, “no one wants to be
seen defending American policy.’’ “For me, the war has divided the world into two camps,’’ said
Abu-Ila Maddi, a Cairo political activist. “There is the camp of justice
and peace, and the camp of aggression that wants hegemony. The danger is
that hatred building up toward the second camp could turn against anything
that is American — American business, American people, not just American
policy.’’
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.
|