|
الجزيرة
News
Archives
Arab
Cartoonists
Columnists
Documents
Editorials
Opinion
Editorials
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
News
Photos
Peace
Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Public
Activities
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
All roads to a better future lead through
Palestine
The Daily Star, 4/16/03
No one who understands such matters had any
doubts that once the United States led an invasion of Iraq, the former
would prevail. What remains to be seen is whether US President George W.
Bush is willing to invest the same amounts of effort, money, time, and
politico-diplomatic capital in a resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
He has enough advisers to know by now that whatever goals have been
achieved in Iraq will not matter very much or for very long unless
he unties the Gordian knot at the core of the region’s problems: Israeli
occupation of Palestinian land.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair is said to be whispering all the right
things in Bush’s ear, but that is no guarantee that the latter has
either the wisdom to accept the advice or the courage to implement it. The
first indication of how committed the United States is will come when the
long-delayed “road map” to peace is finally made public. Ostensibly
authored by the international “Quartet” of mediators (the United
States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations), that document
will be carefully perused to determine just how much of it was rewritten
by the Americans at Israeli insistence. Should the proposal turn out to be
one calculated to elicit an automatic Palestinian rejection, the entire
Middle East will be sentenced anew to more frustration, more tension and
more violence.
What Bush and his brain trust need to understand is that the peace process
cannot be successful so long as elements on one or both sides have the
ability to veto any hint of progress. It is not just the obvious gore
wrought by Palestinian suicide bombers that has stymied efforts at
reconciliation. Israel has contributed to the same obstructionism with
tactics whose number and cynicism are matched only by their breathtaking
temerity: Reoccupation, assassinations, home demolitions, settlements,
curfews and closures are just a few of the measures that have assailed the
peace process just as directly as anything carried out by Hamas or Islamic
Jihad.
The real test of the Bush administration’s policies in the Middle East
has yet to take place, and it has nothing to do with the overthrow of a
Third World tyranny by the most powerful military ever assembled.
Washington’s plans for the region will sink or swim in Palestine and
nowhere else. That is where the eyes of the international community are
focused and where all Arabs look for indications of US intentions.
The riddle is not insoluble, but the damage incurred by failing to act now
will be irreparable. Bush need not demand that Ariel Sharon throw open his
arsenal of banned weapons or decamp with his sons within 48 hours,
gratifying though such ultimatums would be. Instead, all he has to do is
convince the Israeli prime minister to abide by the relevant UN Security
Council resolutions. The two sides have been close to an agreement before,
and they can get there again but only if and when the United States
establishes beyond any doubt that it will accept no other result.
The beauty of the Palestinian issue is that an equitable agreement can
help further a host of worthwhile objectives across the region, including
genuine democratization, economic growth, open markets and increased
stability. The unfortunate corollary to this capacity for good, however,
is an unstoppable propensity to block these and other ambitions if the
status quo is allowed to persist. The choice of which route to follow is
Bush’s for the taking.
http://www.aljazeerah.info
Opinions
expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors
and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.
|
|