Arab Normalization with the Israeli Occupation
Apartheid Regime Is a Political Suicide
By Mu'hammed
Bal'awi
Palestine Information
Center, September 10, 2023
|
|
|
|
Libyan foreign minister, Najla Manghosh, jwho was fired on
August 28, 2023 wikipedia |
|
Normalization with Israel is political suicide
The revelation by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the end
of August about a secret meeting between Israeli Foreign Minister Eli
Cohen and his Libyan counterpart Najla Al-Mangoush in Rome has sparked
strong internal and external reactions despite the absence of diplomatic
relations between the two parties. This led to Cohen being summoned by
the US ambassador to Israel, handing him the US administration’s protest
against the leak and accusing the Israeli government of undermining
Washington’s efforts to promote normalization with other countries.
The Libyan public’s anger and rejection of normalization with the
Zionist state in all its aspects, and the buzz created by this leak,
reveal that the occupying state does not rely on itself to enhance its
presence and relations with other countries. Instead, it is always
linked and dependent on external factors, whether the European colonial
powers that established it or current sponsorship by the US. The
normalization of Arab and Islamic countries with the occupation regime
came under pressure from the US, and without its pressures and
temptations, these countries would not have recognized Israel and
established relations with it. Therefore, we could understand the
significant annoyance of the US administration over this leak and its
accusation of Cohen undermining its efforts.
The dispute over
this leak is not the first, as the relationship between the current
ruling elite in the Zionist state, which has become an extremist
right-wing religious state, and the Zionist circles in the US – whether
Jewish or non-Jewish – is characterized by a state of severe tension
stemming from the US and Western Zionist elite’s vision that the
Israelis are trying to change the nature that was established for the
State of Israel.
This elite is attempting to modify the behavior
of the Israeli government, which has become more religious in the
traditional sense and distant from the Western model. Nevertheless, the
US and Western elites continue to persistently support the occupation
diplomatically, economically and militarily because it is, in essence, a
Western project. There is no better evidence of this than the statement
by US President Joe Biden during his meeting with Israeli President
Isaac Herzog: “If Israel did not exist, we would have to invent it.”
Despite this dispute, the Biden administration continues to exert
pressure on Arab and Islamic countries to normalize relations with the
Zionist state.
US anger is completely justified because it
endangers Libyan Prime Minister Abdel Hamid Dbeibeh’s government and may
cause internal instability in a country that can hardly be described as
stable. It is difficult to believe that the Libyan foreign minister
conducted the meeting on her own initiative. However, the leak of the
event and the angry reactions and fear of its impact on the unstable
Libyan scene have led the prime minister to blame Al-Mangoush.
We
can understand the Libyan prime minister’s initiative to absorb the
anger resulting from the leak by talking about forming an investigation
committee and visiting the Palestinian Embassy in Tripoli, where he
announced the dismissal of Al-Mangoush. It demonstrates that
normalization with the occupation is not a popular or natural choice,
but rather a choice made by an elite who believes the US holds all the
cards.
Establishing relations with the occupation state aims to
improve relations with Washington for local considerations. We have seen
a similar situation in Sudan after the fall of former President Omar
Al-Bashir’s regime, where various Sudanese leaders, including the head
of the Sudanese Transitional Sovereign Council Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan,
rushed to receive Israeli delegations, exchange visits and establish
relations. However, this only resulted in further instability, plunging
the country into a fierce internal war.
Although the Sudanese
leadership had hoped for economic improvement and legitimacy for the
ruling system through normalization and improving relations with the US,
the opposite happened. We can confidently say Sudan is going through the
worst phase in its history.
This leads us to say, without a
doubt, that the decision of normalization lacks popular legitimacy and
will have serious internal repercussions on the governing system in the
medium and long term. This is because the Israeli regime is a
retrogressive, racist system born out of colonialism, and the peoples of
the region are fed up with colonization and its tools, as we currently
witness in some sub-Saharan countries, which have also created a reality
where tens of thousands of Arab youth lose hope and turn to migration or
violence.
Apart from the internal political reality in Arab and
Muslim countries, the Arab system of failure will ultimately lead to
radical changes that may be more devastating than the Arab Spring. We
will see that normalization will become futile at that point. We
witnessed dozens of African countries that established relations with
Israel, freezing their ties during confrontations with the Gamal Abdel
Nasser regime, and it took years to restore them. During the October
1973 war, Israel lost most of those relationships with African
countries, reducing the number of countries with diplomatic relations to
only five, compared to the previous 32.
We also see that Arab
countries that previously normalized with the occupation have gained
nothing. If the situation in the Arab and Islamic world becomes stable
and democratic, we will see that relations with Israel will collapse
like a house of cards because they are unnatural and not based on
national interests.
This behavior of revealing Israel’s secret
relationships aims to exploit and invest in it for electoral purposes
and gain more popularity among the Israeli public. We have seen Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu do this before, even speaking about
secret relationships he did not disclose for the same reason. Some of
these relationships were woven decades before Netanyahu, but the
personal dimension of Israeli politicians does not prevent them from
attributing the achievements of others to themselves and exaggerating
them, as Cohen did when he spoke about imminent relations with Saudi
Arabia despite statements to the contrary from the US administration.
Israeli politicians are self-centered, and all they care about is
reaping the fruits of fake achievements or those achieved by others in
order to stay in power.
- Dr Mohammad Makram Balawi is a
Palestinian writer and academic based in Istanbul. President of the
Asia-Middle East Forum. His article appeared in MEMO.
Normalization with Israel is political suicide (palinfo.com)
***