Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
The Jared Cushner Plan Consolidates the Current
Israeli Apartheid One-State Reality, Nothing More
By James Zogby
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN,
July 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
Israeli Apartheid state in practice:Palestinias in the West Bank
in an Israeli military checkpoint to allow them to pass |
Israeli dispossession of the Palestinian people, by the
continuous theft of their lands, 1947-2006 |
What If Palestinians “Take the Money and Run?”
I wasn't at the "Peace to Prosperity" Summit, but I listened to some
of the speeches and read the documents the White House produced for the
event. Nothing that I saw or read changed my belief that the entire
affair was long on fantasy, short on reality. Even with that, however, a
heretical thought came to mind – but more on that later.
Let me
make it clear at the outset that I am a fan of imagining the future.
During the Clinton Administration my mantra with regard to the
Israeli-Palestinian process was that what was needed was "a vision of
the future that was so compelling people would be drawn to it." Back
then, there was still the hope that a political solution could be found
leading to an independent Palestinian state in the territories that
Israel had occupied in 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
It was such a vision that led Yasser Arafat to imagine, that with
independence, Gaza could become like Singapore. With peace and freedom,
Palestinians could connect the West Bank to Gaza. They could build a
seaport and airport, attract investment, start businesses and become a
commercial hub and a tourist destination.
There were other grand
ideas. In fact, despite Jared Kushner's patronizing presumptuousness,
nothing in his vision was new, since Palestinians had already imagined
such a future. But all came crashing down to earth when Israel
implemented a closure of the borders after the an Israeli massacred
Muslim worshippers in Hebron; erected hundreds of purely punitive
checkpoints throughout the West Bank; cut East Jerusalem off from the
rest of the occupied lands; built a wall inside of '67 line and
established a network of military outposts and settlements in the Jordan
Valley, which denied Palestinians full access to almost 25% of their
most fertile fields; intensified policies of collective punishment,
repression, humiliation, and degradation of millions of innocent
civilians; denied Palestinians access to over 80% of their land and
natural resources; blockaded and strangled Gaza; and began a massive
settlement expansion program that has seen the number Israelis in the
West Bank almost quadruple to over 620,000 settlers.
OK, I know
that Kushner warned in his speech that there would be someone like me
who would be Mr. Negativity – bringing up the old arguments of the past
and blaming Israel for everything. But it's important to point out that
Kushner, while completely absolving the Israelis, did his own share of
blaming. Except, in his case, all the blame was placed squarely on the
Palestinians' shoulders – as if all of the Palestinian's problems were
of their own making. I've been too close to this situation for too long
and while I can find fault in the ossified and struggling Palestinian
Authority and the brutally stupid, self-defeating tactics employed by
Hamas, the flaws of the Palestinians are a function of the impossible
situation created by deformities resulting from Israel's brutal and
oppressive policies. Blaming the Palestinians is nothing more than
blaming the victim while letting the victimizer go free.
The
reality is that there is a reason why the Palestinian economy never
"took off" – Palestinians were denied the opportunity to grow by the
relentless occupation that refused to cede control.
Compounding
Kushner's detachment from reality was his lack of self-awareness
regarding the impact of the policies pursued by his own administration
and the laughable absurdity of his claim that he and President Trump
"haven't given up on the Palestinians" and still care for them! The
Trump team has turned a blind eye to Israel's land seizures, settlement
expansion, "legalization" of outposts, and home demolitions. In addition
to moving the US Embassy to East Jerusalem, they have acquiesced to
Israeli policies that have consolidated control and expanded settler
compounds in East Jerusalem and are even now suggesting that they would
look favorably on further annexations in other parts of the West Bank.
And they have cut all aid to Palestinian institutions, including
hospitals and schools. To now suggest that they want to "empower
Palestinians" through education and health care is disingenuous, at
best.
With this in mind, as I listened to Kushner's speech and
read through the plans, offended by their lack of reality, patronizing
tone, naiveté, and refusal to acknowledge how we got to where we are, a
heretical idea came to mind: imagine what might happen if Palestinians
were to take the money and run?
From its beginning, Israel
mastered the art of dissembling. They have repeatedly agreed to terms
that they had no intention of honoring. Instead, they pocketed their
gains and moved on. In the beginning, they agreed to a partition and
then plotted how to ethnically cleanse the area to make their new state,
in Ben Gurion's words, "larger and more Jewish". They signed the Camp
David Accords having no intention of fulfilling even its most minimal
requirements for the Palestinians. They did the same with Oslo and Wye.
And they repeatedly agreed to "settlement freezes" – never intending to
stop expanding their control over the occupied lands. So, what if
Palestinians decided to play the same game? What if they did what the
Israelis have done? What if they decided to build the Palestinian
economy and improve the daily life of Palestinians – while maintaining
focus on the long game?
Agreeing to play along in no way negates
Palestinian rights. Economic empowerment doesn't negate political
rights, nor will it buy acquiescence to the denial of these rights.
Palestinian aspirations can't be bought and sold for a price.
Let's face it, we are in an emerging
one state reality – an Apartheid state. Israeli policy led to this and
the Kushner plan will only serve to consolidate it. At
present, the majority of the population between the River and the Sea is
Arab. The problem is that Palestinians lack rights and power, and they
lack a strategy to gain the power they will need to secure their rights.
What if they were to exploit the opportunity
provided by Kushner's plan to build Palestinian society as an important
step on the way to developing the strength to secure political rights
and freedom? In fact, history shows that when people live in economic
despair, they are less inclined to demand political rights. Only when
they gain a degree of economic relief do they turn to demand greater
political freedom.
So if Kushner is promising: to open up the
West Bank by removing barriers to travel; to connect the West Bank to
Gaza; to make Gaza a tourist haven; to promote investment in Palestinian
institutions; etc. – what if Palestinians took the money and ran? What
if Palestinians used this offer to develop a new strategic vision –
taking the steps to transform the current emerging one state reality
into a democratic secular state?
Kushner may not realize what the
end result of an empowered and prosperous Palestinian community will be.
And he may be totally naïve in failing to recognize that the Israelis
will kick and scream at the prospect of a prosperous and empowered
Palestinian community. But that's his problem, not the Palestinians.
It's interesting to imagine the future should Palestinians take on
this game with a political and strategic vision that sees prosperity not
as the end of the road, but as paving the path to Palestinian
empowerment and ultimate leadership in the new one state reality. In
this regard, we might see Kushner's plan, not as the "too-clever" path
to maintaining Palestinian subordination to the Israeli occupation.
Rather it may be the naively designed path with the unintended
consequence that will lead, a generation from now, to an entirely new
reality.
The Israelis and the US will howl, but they are the
ones who dug this hole for themselves. Maybe one day the Palestinians
could build a resort in Gaza or Jaffa and name it after Jared Kushner –
as the father of the new secular democratic state that will come to be
between the River and the Sea.
If that's not exactly the vision
of the future the US and Israel are seeking, that's what they'll get.
Palestinians will continue to demand freedom and rights and as an
empowered majority, it's only a matter of time before they rise up and
secure those rights.
If that's not what the US and Israel want,
then it might be a good idea for them to go back to the drawing boards
and muster the courage and resolve to end the occupation and provide
Palestinians with the justice and freedom they deserve and need to truly
prosper in an independent state of their own.
***
Share the link of this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|