Time to Break the US Silence on Palestine, Says 
		Michelle Alexander  
				By James J 
				Zogby 
		Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, 
		January 28, 2019  
				 | 
				
			    | 
			
		
		
			
				
				  | 
				
				  | 
			
			
				| 
				Michelle Alexander | 
				
				  | 
			
		
		 
		Michelle Alexander Has Opened a Door, We Must Work to Keep It 
		Open
		This past Sunday, the New York Times featured on the front page of 
		its "Week in Review" section a major column by Michelle Alexander - "Time 
		to Break the Silence on Palestine." It was, by any measure, an 
		important article because of who wrote it, where it appeared, and its 
		breathtaking indictment of both Israel's history of violations of 
		Palestinian rights and the silence of US policymakers to address these 
		outrageous behaviors.  
As a renowned civil rights attorney and 
		author of the best-selling "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the 
		Age of Colorblindness," Alexander's voice matters. While in the past the 
		Times has run a few opinion pieces critical of Israel, the placement and 
		promotion given to this article guaranteed that it would gain national 
		attention. And it did. Millions read it, tens of thousands commented on 
		it, and scores of others wrote columns favorably reviewing Alexander's 
		observations.  
The reaction in Israel and among the American 
		Jewish establishment was immediate and predictably hysterical. A former 
		Israeli Ambassador to the US said that Alexander's article "dangerously 
		delegitimizes us. It is a strategic threat..." The Anti-Defamation 
		League, B'nai B'rith, and the American Jewish Committee in tweets and 
		statements called the article: "dangerously flawed"; "anti-Semitic"; an 
		"anti-Israel rant...filled with errors"; "a shameful appropriation" of 
		the memory of Martin Luther King. 
This panicked reaction to 
		Alexander was unsurprising because it represents just one more 
		indication that hardline Israeli propagandists are losing their ability 
		to shape political discourse on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As 
		Alexander notes in her article, in recent years we have seen: major US 
		churches divesting from Israel, the growing support of young African 
		American activists with the cause of justice for Palestinian; the 
		backlash over the firing of a CNN commentator over his pro-Palestinian 
		positions; and the election of pro-Palestinian Members of Congress. 
		
Because these developments only scratch the surface of the change 
		that is underway, the nervousness demonstrated by the Jewish 
		establishment was to be expected. Polling shows that Israel has lost 
		significant support among the young, the educated, and minority 
		communities (African American, Latino, and Asian American - who together 
		comprise about a third of the US population). As a consequence, there is 
		a debate on Israel/Palestine underway on campuses, among major 
		Protestant churches, in the Black community, and in the Democratic 
		Party. And, in this debate, arguments demanding justice for Palestinians 
		are being heard and winning. 
In challenging this drift, 
		pro-Israel propagandists have drawn all their weapons. Pro-Palestinian 
		activists and commentators have been smeared, intimidated, and 
		threatened with dire repercussions. While some voices have been 
		silenced, the movement away from accepting the Israeli line continues to 
		grow. 
If I were to identify two main reasons for this erosion of 
		support for Israel and increased support for Palestinians, I would point 
		to the role that alternative media has played in making it possible for 
		the reality of what is happening in the occupied territories to be 
		better known and the role played by the virtual marriage of US President 
		Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 
My 
		brother John Zogby observed in his important study of the changing 
		attitudes of American demographic groups that as a direct result of the 
		internet, young people and minority communities have developed a global 
		consciousness - they are less tied to narrow parochial concerns. They 
		have access to more sources of information and are more questioning of 
		the "accepted dogma" of political elites. As Israel continues its 
		rightward drift, with ultra-nationalists in control now and for the 
		foreseeable future, and as the Christian right-wing and nativists 
		continue to dominate the Republican Party, it is to be expected that 
		alliances would be formed in opposition to this bonding of US and 
		Israeli hardline ideologues. 
As I noted, this change has been 
		brewing for some time now, but it was the Michelle Alexander article in 
		the New York Times that has helped bring it to the surface. As important 
		as this moment may be, I must admit that my delight was tempered by the 
		feelings of regret that all of this change has come too late for so 
		many. 
I thought of the Nakba and the uprooting and dispossession 
		of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes and how for 
		decades they have been denied the right to return. I thought of the 
		horrors of the now 70 year occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East 
		Jerusalem - the theft of their land, the economic strangulation to which 
		they've been subjected, the demolition of their homes, the brutal 
		unreported acts of collective punishment, the torture, the prolonged 
		imprisonment of thousands without charges, and the daily humiliation 
		they have endured at the hands of soldiers and settlers. And I thought 
		of the courageous intellectuals and activists, Arabs and Jews, here in 
		the US and in Israel and Palestine, who over the decades paid a dear 
		price for their efforts to elevate Palestinian rights in a less 
		welcoming time.  
And then I thought of the brilliant Palestinian 
		Fayez Sayegh, who decades ago gave us hope that one day change would 
		come - that the tide would turn when we didn't expect it and we would 
		discover that despite the power of our opponents, change was afoot and 
		we would see a way forward. 
Here it is - the moment he 
		predicted. A door has opened, but knowing that our opponents will be 
		working hard to slam it shut, we must redouble our efforts to build the 
		movement that challenges Israel's history of oppression. We owe this 
		much to those victims of the past and to those who are still suffering 
		from dispossession and occupation. Alexander has shown us an open door. 
		We have to have the courage and commitment to continue to keep it open. 
		***
		
		 
		Share the link of this article with your facebook friends