US, China, Russia, and Iran: A World of Multiple Detonators of Global Wars By James Petras Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, December 21, 2018

We face a world of multiple wars some leading to direct global power
conflagrations and others that begin as regional conflicts but quickly spread to big power
confrontations.

We will proceed to identify ‘great power’ confrontations and then proceed to
discuss the stages of ‘proxy’ wars with world war consequences.

In our times the US is the principal power in search of world domination through
force and violence. Washington has targeted top level targets, namely China, Russia,and
Iran; secondary objectives include Afghanistan, North and Central Africa, Caucuses and
Latin America.

China is the prime enemy of the US for several economic, political and military
reasons: China is the second largest economy in the world; its technology has challenged
US supremacy; it has built global economic networks reaching across three continents.
China has replaced the US in overseas markets, investments and infrastructures. China
has built an alternative socio-economic model which links state banks and planning to
private sector priorities. On all these counts the US has fallen behind and its future
prospects are declining.

In response, the US has resorted to a closed protectionist economy at home and an
aggressive military led imperial economy abroad. President Trump has declared a tariff
war on China; and multiple, separatist and propaganda war; and an aerial and maritime
war of encirclement.

The first line of attack is exorbitant tariffs on China’s exports to the US and its
vassals. Secondly, is the expansion of overseas bases in Asia. Thirdly, is the promotion
of separatist clients in Hong Kong, Tibet, and among the Uighurs. Fourthly, is the use of
sanctions to bludgeon EU and Asian allies into joining the economic war against China.
China has responded by increasing its military security, expanding its economic networks
and raising economic tariffs on US exports.

The US economic war has moved to a higher level by arresting and seizing a top
executive of China’s foremost technological company, Huawei.

The White House has moved up the ladder of aggression from sanctions to
provocation, it is one step from military retaliation. The nuclear fuse has been lit.
Russia faces similar threats to its domestic economy and its overseas allies,
especially China and Iran .Moreover the US has broken its compliance with the
intermediate nuclear missiles. agreement

Iran faces oil sanctions, military encirclement and attacks on proxy allies namely
Yemen, Syria and the Gulf region Washington relies on Saudi Arabia, Israel and their
paramilitary groups to apply military and economic pressure to undermine Iran’s
economy and impose a ‘regime change’.

Each of the three strategic targets of the US are central to its drive for global
dominance; dominating China would lead to the takeover of Asia, weakening Russia
isolates Europe ; the overthrow of Iran enhances US power over the oil market and the
Islamic world. As the US escalates its aggression and provocations we face the threat of
a global nuclear war or, at the best, a world economic breakdown.

Wars by Proxy

The US has targeted a second tier of enemies, in Latin America, Asia and Africa.
In Latin America the US has waged economic warfare against Venezuela, Cuba
and Nicaragua. More recently it has applied political and economic pressure on Bolivia.
Washington has relied on its vassal allies, including Brazil, Peru, Chile, Ecuador,
Argentina and Paraguay and domestic right-wing elites.

As in numerous other cases, Washington relies on military coups and corrupt
legislaters and judges to rule against incumbent progressive regimes Against President
Morales, Washington relies on US foundation funded NGO’s; dissident indigenous
leaders and retired military officials. The US relies on local armed proxies to further US
imperial goals in order to give the appearance of a ‘civil war’ rather than gross US
intervention.

In fact, once the so-called ‘dissidents’ or ‘rebels’ establish a beachhead they
‘invite’ US military advisers, secure military aid and serve as propaganda weapons
against Russia, China and Iran – ‘first tier’ adversaries.

In recent years US proxy conflicts have been a weapon of choice in the Kosovo
separatist war against Serbia; the Ukraine coup of 2014 and war against Eastern Ukraine;
the Kurd take over of Northern Iraq and Syria; the US backed separatist Uighurs attack in
the Chinese province of Xinjiang.

The US has established 32 military bases in Africa, to coordinate activities with
local warlords and plutocrats. Their proxy wars are described as local conflicts between
‘legitimate’ regimes and Islamic terrorists, tribalists and tyrants.

The objectives of proxy wars are threefold. They serve as ‘feeders’ into larger
territorial wars encircling China, Russia and Iran.

Secondly, proxy wars are ‘testing grounds’ to measure the vulnerability and
responsive capacity of the targeted strategic adversary, i.e. Russia, China and Iran.

Thirdly, the proxy wars are ‘low cost’ and ‘low risk’ attacks on strategic enemies.
The lead up to a major confrontation by stealth.

Equally important ‘proxy wars’ serve as propaganda tools, accusing strategic
adversaries as ‘expansionist authoritarian’ enemies of ‘western values’.

Conclusion

US empire builders engage in multiple types of aggression directed at imposing a
unipolar world. At the center are trade wars against China; regional military conflicts
with Russia, and economic sanctions against Iran.

These large scale, long-term strategic weapons are complemented by proxy wars,
involving regional vassal states which are designed to erode the economic bases of allies
of anti-imperialist powers.

Hence, the US attacks on China via tariff wars aims to sabotage its global “Belt
and Road’ infrastructure projects linking China with 82 counties.

Likewise, the US attempts to isolate Russian via a proxy war in Syria as it did
with Iraq, Libya and the Ukraine.

Isolating strategic anti-imperial power via regional wars, sets the stage for the
‘final assault’ – regime change by coup or nuclear war.

However, the US drive for world domination has so far failed to isolate or weaken
its strategic adversaries.

China moves forward with its global infrastructure program; and the trade war has
had little impact in isolating Bejing from its principal markets. Moreover, the US policy
has increased China’s role as a leading advocate of ‘open trade’ against President
Trump’s protectionism.

Likewise, the tactics of encircling and sanctioning Russia has deepened ties
between Moscow and Beijing. The US has increased its nominal ‘proxies’ in Latin
America and Africa but they all depend on trade and investments from China. This is
especially true of agro-mineral exports to China.

Notwithstanding the limits of US power and its failure to topple regimes,
Washington has taken moves to compensate for its failures by escalating the threats of a
global war. It kidnaps Chinese economic leaders; it moves war ships off China’s coast; it
allies with neo-fascist elites in the Ukraine. It threatens to bomb Iran. In other words the
US political leaders have embarked on adventurous policies always on the verge of
igniting one, two, many nuclear fuses.

It is easy to imagine how a failed trade war can lead to a nuclear war; a regional
conflict can entail a greater war.

Can we prevent World War III?

I believe it can happen. The US economy is built on fragile foundations; its elites are deeply divided. Its main allies in France and the UK are in deep crises. The war mongers and war makers lack popular support. There are reasons to hope!

***

Share the link of this article with your facebook friends