Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
|
John Kerry and
Donald Trump Both Serve Zionism, Just Like Peres and Netanyahu
By Mazin Qumsiyeh
Al-Jazeerah,
CCUN, January 4, 2017 |
|
|
|
John Kerry |
|
Author's Note:
This article is analytical of the fictional division between
"left" and right in US politics and Zionism's roles in parasitizing and
destroying the US system. The delusions of John Kerry and Donald Trump are
that they can both serve Zionism and save the US empire.
*** Thomas Merton wrote: "Into this world, this demented inn, in
which there is absolutely no room for him at all, Christ has come uninvited.
But because he cannot be at home in it – because he is out of place in it,
and yet must be in it – his place is with those others who do not belong,
who are rejected because they are regarded as weak; and with those who are
discredited, who are denied the status of persons, and are tortured,
exterminated. With those for whom there is no room, Christ is present in
this world. He is mysteriously present in those for whom there seems to be
nothing but the world at its worst."
John Kerry is delusional if he thinks he can
temporarily curb the appetite of those who believe in an ideology of
conquest, subjugation and exceptionalism (“chosen people”) to save
“Zionism”. His claim that Shimon Peres told him that 78% of Palestine is
enough and that they should let the Palestinians have the other 22% is
simply not believable. Shimon Peres never changed his views from his youth
as a disciple of Ben Gurion (Rabin and the two of them masterminded the
ethnic cleansingand destruction of 500 towns and villages between 1948 and
1950). To his last breath Peres was a
racist, a bigot, and an unrepentant war criminal (not to
mention his build-up of Israel’s arsenal of WMD). He always believed Jews
are smarter, chosen, and are entitled to rule over geate Israel and like his
mentor, he thought a two-state support is mostly for propaganda. Like his
Zionist colleagues whether they believed in God or not (and most of them did
not) or they were “left” or “right”, he believed in something they consider
more important than all of that: the unity and destiny of the chosen “Jewish
people” (a myth no more true than “the Muslim people”, the “white people” or
the “Christian People”). This tribal racist thinking infects “left” and
right Zionist Jews alike. The only difference between left Zionists like
Kerry and Right Zionists like Trump’s son-in-law is merely over tactics
(such as timing of applying force and timing of applying diplomacy) not
ultimate goals. The even bigger delusion is that it is possible to exploit
the differences between the Zionists over tactics to save Israel from
historical trends that are inevitable and as predictable as sunrise.
We heard the delusional parameters Kerry copied from the Clinton parameters
which in turn were ones with a genealogy that goes back to Ben Gurion of the
1920s (public speeches not his private diaries and letters to his son where
he articulated the same vision of greater Israel as his right wing critics
and explained that speaking of partition is merely for outside public
consumption and that actions on the ground is what matters to achieve the
goal of a Jewish empire/Greater Israel). Now here are six parameters based
on reality instead f the Kerry delusional parameters:
1) There never
is and never was any justification for colonialism whether Jewish
colonialism here or white colonialism in South Africa. Corollary is that
Zionism is racism and is not compatible with peace.
2) There are 12.5
million Palestinians (50% inside Palestine) in the world and no peace can
happen without return of refugees, self-determination and full equality
(negated by a concept of a Jewish state or a Muslim state or a Christian
state for that matter).
3) Colonialism has one of only three
outcomes/models: a) win by the natives at great cost (Algerian model), b)
genocide of natives (Australia, USA, New Zealand model), c) integration in
one country for all its inhabitants (including descendants of the
colonizers). Since options (a) and (b) are virtually impossible here and now
(21st century) that leaves option (c) which is in any case the most common
outcomes in similar cases. Dozens of countries in central and south America,
Canada, Southeast Asia, and South Africa follow that pattern. A “two-state”
mirage is just that and will never happen/can never happen (see my book
“Sharing the Land f Canaan” to explain why, it is available at
http://qumsiyeh.org/sharingthelandofcanaan/
).
4) Zionism existed before creating the “Jewish state” and will
survive after it is ended and becomes a democratic state for all its
citizens and the returning refugees. It is an ideology of parasitism and “chosenness”
that transcends geography and speaks of contentedness of all Jews around the
world and their mutual interest and bonding. Zionists who live in other
countries (including those that shape US’s foreign policy whether executed
by a democrat or a republican) readily tell you that Israel is their
insurance policy that they could always go to if there are “troubles”. It is
sort of like the island of the pirates of the Caribbean that was a safety
net. Any Jew who challenges such notions and believes that Jews can be
American or German and should be loyal citizens of their own countries first
or that Israel should be treated like any other country and and forced to
comply with International law (including allowing Palestinian refugees to
return to their homes and lands) is looked at as a self-hating Jew. Hence
John Kerry and Madeline Albright and people like them who “discover” their
“Jewishness” would not want to be called “self-hating” and they do
everything to help Zionism (ofcourse from the “left” angle of tactics as
Trump will do it from the “right” angle).
5) In the near future, US
policy will continue unchanged as it was since 1967 and the Israeli attack
on the USS Liberty (Israel lobby ensured scuttling the fact that it was a
deliberate attack). The US has been and will continue to subvert US
interests in favor of Zionist interests. That the mainstream media and
Hollywood are managed by zionists (whether "left" or right) will probably
help this trend continue until the US declines as a world power
significantly more (largely due to this Zionist parasitism). The Palestinian
and Arab leadership would be wiser to hitch their wagons to different horses
before they end-up like Saddam Hussain and Qaddafi. China, Russia, and Iran
are certainly not the most desirable countries but at least those horses are
not chained by the Zionist masters and watch their own interests instead of
Israel's. The big fuss over Obama's abstention and Kerry speech is blown out
of proportion: Since 1967, every US President has allowed a very few/rare UN
Security Council Resolutions directed (mildly and without sanctions) against
Israeli policies. Obama has allowed the fewest (one in 8 years) Carter
allowed the most (14 in 4 years): LBJ 7 , Nixon 15, Ford 2 , Carter 14 ,
Reagan 21, GHW Bush 9, Clinton 3 ,GW Bush 6, Obama 1. None of these had any
significance in changing the steadfast policy that the US supported Israel,
shielded it from |International law, and funded its aggression. You cannot
credibly claim you do not like your son beating other children with clubs
that you keep buying for him!!
6) You can fool all the people some of
the time or some of the people all the time but you cannot fool all the
people all the time. The internet has begun to fray the Zionist hegemony of
the media. Note that even in the most moderate of media outlets like PBS,
they bring left and right Zionists to argue but they never allow you to hear
from anti-Zionist or post-Zionist. Other media outlets are owned and
operated by either left Zionists (e.g. New York Times, CNN) or right wing
Zionists (e.g. Fox News). But more and more people are seeing this and the
jig is coming up and that is why Zionists moved to using their lobbies to
legislate silence (criticism of Zionism becomes “anti-Semitic”). In doing so
the Zionists do not care that they are moving Western governments to become
undemocratic (curbing free speech). Their short term calculations that this
helps their cause will just as surely backfire as their pushing the US to
enter World War I in exchange for getting the Balfour and Cambon
declarations or pushing the US to go to war on the Iraqi people. The former
partially led to WWII which was not good for anyone and the latter cost US
taxpayers $3 trillion and ended up benefiting Iran. Before that the push for
the war on Lebanon strengthened Hizbollah. After that came the Zionist push
for the war on Syria (ostensibly to break the Shia crescent of
Lebanon-Syria-Iran) and Yemen hoped to “win” and drive Arab states into the
lap of Zionism. But every push has a counter-push and every action has a
reaction (basic physics as basic human psychology).
Some Zionists can
*talk* about partition but show me one of their leaders who publicly
acknowledge that we native Palestinians (Christians and Muslims) have rights
of sovereignty. The reason they can’t is that if they recognize our rights
even just over Ramallah, their whole ideology collapses. After all, what is
the difference between that and recognizing our rights in Haifa, Jaffa,
Nazareth etc Hence the two state idea remains a figment of an imagination
to lead to peace like the mirage of the desert will not lead to water.
What does it take to change dynamics? Challenge
both versions representing Zionist
interests: Clinton’s and Trump’s (Peres’ and Netanyahu’s).
Work for a global uprising against those who actually appoint such puppets.
That remains the 1% versus the 99%. Our message to all people (starting with
Jews and Israelis who still support Zionism): end your delusions, join the
99% and let us work for a better world where justice prevails and all are
treated with dignity and respect regardless of their religious belief (or
lack thereof). As Martin Luther King Jr once said “we either live together
as fellow human beings or perish together as fools.”
For an example
of real mobilization for change, see the Zapatistas.
ConSiences of Humanity Conference organized by Zapatistas. A great step
in what we have always called for a global intifada against the racist
capitalist systems
https://floweroftheword.wordpress.com/2016/12/29/ezln-inauguration-of-the-gathering-the-zapatistas-and-consciences-for-humanity/
Is Team Trump Instructing this New Year’s Grinch OFAC to Destroy JCPOA?
by FRANKLIN LAMB
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/12/27/is-team-trump-instructing-this-new-years-grinch-ofac-to-destroy-jcpoa/
[OFAC is Office of Foreign Assets Control in the US Treasury Department run
by a Zionist and JCPOA is now commonly referred to by Zionist media as the
Iran deal]
Why Obama waited 8 years to take on Netanyahu
http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/obama-waited-netanyahu/
A videotape from 1961 where Benjamn H. Freedman (a Jewish American who
converted to Christianity) tells a bit of history that is relevant to
current events https://youtu.be/x8OmxI2AYV8
Stay Human Mazin Qumsiyeh
***
Share the link of this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|