Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Anti-Semitic Zionists of the Coming Trump
By Uri Avnery
CCUN, January 4, 2017
WHAT REALLY got me was the applause.
There, they were sitting at the round table, the representatives of the
entire world, applauding their own handiwork, the resolution they had
just adopted unanimously. The Security Council, like the Knesset, is not
used to applause or any other spontaneous outbursts. And yet they
clapped their hands like children who had just received their Christmas
(It was indeed a day before Christmas and the first day
of Hanukkah, a coincidence that happens once in decades, since the
Christians use the solar calendar and the Jews still use a modified
The delegates were deliriously happy. They had
just achieved something that had eluded them for many years: the
condemnation of a blatant breach of international law by the government
Consecutive presidents of the US had used their
anachronistic veto power to prevent the UN doing its duty. Now,
President Barak Obama, at the very end of his presidency, dared to
challenge the government of Binyamin Netanyahu, a person he detests with
all his heart.
And so, after years of frustration, the highest
international body could adopt a resolution on Israel according to its
convictions. No wonder they behaved like schoolchildren let out for
vacation. A vacation that may, alas, prove to be short.
face of it, the joy was exaggerated. The resolution has almost no
practical meaning. It has no teeth. Netanyahu could use the old oriental
adage: "The dogs bark and the caravan moves on."
Netanyahu's immediate reaction was very different. He acted like a
wounded animal: running berserk, thrashing around, biting everyone in
Some of his reactions bordered on the ridiculous. He
could have belittled the resolution and made fun of it, as Israeli
leaders have done many times before. Instead he recalled his ambassadors
from Senegal and New Zealand (traditionally friendly nations), canceled
visits of foreign statesmen, called in foreign ambassadors for a
dressing-down on Christmas day, threw around insults and especially
besmirched President Obama.
This was obviously a stupid thing to
do. The President still has 21 days to go, 21 long days in which to hurt
Netanyahu. He could, for example, allow the passage of an irrevocable UN
resolution to recognize the State of Palestine as a full member of the
UN. At the moment, all of official Israel is in a state of panic in
anticipation of such a move.
If Netanyahu had read Machiavelli,
he would have known that you do not challenge a lion, unless you are
able to kill him. Especially, I would add, a lion you have insulted and
wounded many times before. Even lions do sometimes get angry.
But Netanyahu's behavior may not be as stupid as it looks. Actually, it
may be quite clever. Depends on his aim.
As a diplomatic
strategy, it is disastrous. But as a strategy to win elections, it is
quite sensible. Here is the great hero, the new King David, fighting for
his people, facing down the entire world. Is there anyone in Israel who
can compare with him?
IN THE bad old days of Golda Meir, one of
the Israeli army's entertainment bands sang a jolly song which started
with the words: "The whole world is against us / But we don't give a
" The band danced around to the tune.
For some reason, Jews
derive satisfaction from a world-wide condemnation.
It affirms what we
have known all the time: that all the nations of the world hate us. It
shows how special and superior we are. It has nothing to do with our own
behavior, God forbid. It is just pure anti-Semitism.
is out-Golda-ing Golda. The old lady now looks down on him from heaven
(or up to him from elsewhere?) with envy.
ZIONISM WAS supposed
to liberate Israel from these old Jewish complexes. We were supposed to
become a normal nation, Israelis instead of "exile" Jews, admired by
other nations. Seems we have not quite succeeded.
But there is a
great hope. Actually, a giant hope. It has a name: Donald Trump.
He has already tweeted that after he assumes power, everything regarding
the UN will change.
But will it? Does anyone including himself
really know what he has in mind? Can Netanyahu be quite sure?
True, he is sending a rabid Jewish-American ultra-right Zionist as his
ambassador to Tel Aviv (or to Jerusalem, we shall see.) A person so
right-wing that he makes Netanyahu himself almost look like a leftist.
But at the same time Trump has appointed as his closest assistant a
radical white racist with full anti-Semitic credentials.
Perhaps, as some believe, it depends entirely on Trump's moods. Who
knows what his mood will be on the morning of the first important UN
vote on Israel? Will he be Trump the Zionist or Trump the anti-Semite?
ACTUALLY, HE can be both. No problem, really.
aim of Zionism is to ingather all the Jews in the world in the Jewish
State. The avowed aim of the anti-Semites is to expel the Jews from all
their countries. Both sides want the same. No conflict.
Herzl, the Founding Father of Zionism, recognized this right from the
beginning. He went to Czarist Russia, which was governed by
anti-Semites, and offered a deal: we take the Jews off your hands, you
help us to convince them to leave. That was in the heyday of the
murderous pogroms. But the Jews who left Russia went en masse to
America, very few to Ottoman-ruled Palestine.
This was not a
unique chapter. Throughout Zionist history, many attempts have been made
to enlist anti-Semites to help in the implementation of the Zionist
Even before the Zionist movement was born, American
and British evangelists preached the ingathering of the Jewish exiles in
the holy land. They may have been Herzls inspiration. However, this
message of redemption for the Jews had a secret clause. The return of
the Jews to Palestine would allow for the second coming of Christ. But
then, the Jews would convert to Christianity. Those who refused would be
In 1939, when the Nazi danger became obvious,
extreme Zionist leader Vladimir (Ze'ev) Jabotinsky called for a meeting
of his followers in Poland. The leaders of the Irgun underground in
Palestine attended. One of them was Abraham Stern, whose nom de guerre
The meeting decided to approach the anti-Semitic
commanders of the Polish army and offer them a deal:
you arm and train
young Polish Jews, and we shall liberate Palestine and transport the
Polish Jews there. The officers agreed and training camps were set up in
Poland. World War II put an end to the plan.
With the outbreak
of the war, Jabotinsky, an ardent Anglophile in spite of everything,
ordered the Irgun to stop all such actions and cooperate with the
British. Stern proposed the opposite approach. His credo was: our enemy
is Britain. The war provides us an opportunity to drive them out. The
enemy of our enemy is our friend. Adolf Hitler is an anti-Semite, but
now he is our potential ally.
Stern's approach caused a split in
the Irgun. A furious debate broke out in all the secret cells. As a
16-year old member, I took part. Being a refugee from Nazi Germany, I
rejected Stern's thesis.
Stern created his own group (later
called Lehi, Hebrew initials of Fighters for the Freedom of Israel, also
known as the "Stern gang".) He sent an emissary to neutral Turkey, where
he delivered the German ambassador a letter for "Mr. Hitler", offering
cooperation. The Fuehrer did not reply. That was, of course, before the
Stern was caught by the British and "shot while
trying to escape". When the war ended, and Soviet Russia became the
enemy of Britain and the West, Stern's heirs approached Stalin and
offered cooperation. Stalin, whose anti-Semitism was becoming more
pronounced at the time, ignored the offer.
During the war, one
of the architects of the Holocaust was Adolf Eichmann, the SS officer
who was in charge of organizing the transport of Hungarian Jews to
Auschwitz. In Budapest he established contact with a group of Zionists,
led by Israel Kastner, with whom he made a deal. As a good-will gesture
he allowed him to send a few hundred Jews to neutral Switzerland.
Eichmann sent one member of the group, Yoel Brand, to Istanbul, with a
crazy-looking offer to the Zionist leadership in Jerusalem: if the
allies provided the Nazis with a thousand trucks, the deportation of the
Hungarian Jews would be stopped.
Contrary to his instructions,
Brand crossed the border into British-occupied Syria and was arrested by
the British. The deportation of the Hungarian Jews - ten thousand a day
What was the Nazis' purpose in this bizarre affair?
My own theory is that Heinrich Himmler was already determined to
dethrone Hitler and make a separate peace with the Western allies.
Eichmann served his plan to establish contact with the allies. As a
dyed-in-the-wool anti-Semite, Himmler was convinced that the Jews
control the world.
Some time after the war, in Israeli
captivity, Eichmann wrote down his memories. He stated that he believed
that the Zionists were the "biologically positive" element of the Jewish
Mahmood Abbas, by the way, as a student at Moscow
University, wrote his doctoral thesis on
CAN TRUMP'S assistants now include rabid Zionists and rabid anti-Semites
at the same time?
Of course they can.
This week, our
far-right Minister of Defense, Avigdor Lieberman, condemned the French
plan to convene (in Paris in a few days from now) a conference on
Israeli-Palestinian peace. The Israeli government fears that there,
Secretary of State John Kerry will submit his detailed practical plan
for a peace agreement, including the setting up of the State of
Palestine. This plan would be adopted by the conference, and then by the
UN Security Council.
This would be President Obama's parting
shot. No veto.
(By the way, Kerry's plan is almost identical
with a plan my friends and I published in 1957, 59 years ago, called
"The Hebrew Manifesto".)
Blazing with fury, Lieberman compared
this to the Dreyfus Affair. Some 120 years ago, a Jewish captain in the
French army was falsely convicted of espionage for Germany and sent to
Devil's Island off French Guiana. He was later acquitted. Zionist
mythology has it that Theodor Herzl, then a Paris correspondent of a
Viennese newspaper, was so shaken by the event that he was inspired with
the Zionist idea.
The coming Paris conference, Lieberman
asserted angrily, was the Dreyfus Affair all over again, only this time
against the entire Jewish people.
But not to worry:
and his anti-Semitic Zionists will put everything in order again.
David Friedman as the US ambassador in Israel: Don't Send Him!
By Uri Avnery
DONALD TRUMP has spat in my face.
Not only in my own face, but in the faces of at least half the
He has appointed a bankruptcy lawyer named David Friedman to the job
of US ambassador in Israel.
This sounds like a bad joke. But it is brutal reality. It sets a
precedent unknown in the annals of international diplomacy.
FIRST OF all, it is bad practice to appoint an ambassador to a
country with which he has a deep personal connection. You don't send a
Cuban-American Castro-hater to be the US ambassador in Havana. You don't
send Kuomintang Chinese from Taiwan to be US ambassador in Beijing.
True, it is not the first time an American Jew has been appointed
ambassador to Israel. There have been two or three, who could just as
well have served as Israeli ambassadors to Washington. But they were far
less opinionated than this specimen.
An ambassador serves as the eyes and ears of the home country in a
foreign state. Among his tasks is providing his superiors in the foreign
office with reliable, unbiased information, on which to base policy. The
ideal ambassador is a cool observer, with no strong feelings towards the
country of his mission, neither positive nor negative.
This description of a diplomat is the exact opposite of this
It would have been far more reasonable to appoint David Friedman as
Israeli ambassador to the United States. Unfortunately this post is
already occupied - by another American Jew. Rumor has it that he was
appointed by Netanyahu at the request of Sheldon Adelson, a Jewish
casino magnate, who puts his money where his mouth is in the
far-far-far Israeli right.
But even this person is a leftist compared to David Friedman.
The name, of course, is a joke in itself. Friede in German means
peace, but this David is the opposite of a Man of Peace. The Biblical
David, by the way, was a man of war through and through, and for this
reason God decreed that only his son, Solomon, would build the First
SO WHO is this man of peace? Since the news of his coming appointment
became known, the internet has been flooded with quotations from his
sayings. All of them incredible, each one more than the last.
One thing stands out even on first reading: when this future US
ambassador says "we", he means "we Israelis". "we true Israelis", "we
Israeli patriots". The territory of Greater Israel, from the
Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan river (at least) is "our country".
Friedman does not identify with all Israelis. He seems to think that
most of us are blind, imbeciles, defeatists. or worse - traitors. This
would set a world record: most Israelis, it appears, are traitors.
So who does Friedman really identify with? A representative sample of
his utterances make this quite clear: he considers himself to belong to
about 5% of the Israeli population: the settlers and the extreme Right.
HERE ARE some of his outstanding opinions;
The Arab citizens of Israel, some 21% percent of the population,
should be stripped of their citizenship. Rather like stripping all
African-Americans of their US citizenship.
There is no "Two-State Solution". Even mentioning such a
possibility verges on treason. (Since I have been accused of having been
the first to voice this solution in 1949, this is more spit I have to
wipe from my face.)
No settler must be allowed to be removed from his "home", even if
this "home" is located on the private property of Arab farmers.
In Greater Israel, from the sea to the river, Jews constitute a
majority of 65%. This is a blatant lie: In this territory, including the
Gaza Strip, the Arabs already constitute a majority.
Future President Trump should be encouraged to dismiss all State
Department personnel who advocate the Two-State Solution.
Palestinians are corrupt.
President Barak Obama is a "blatant antisemite".
Bashar al-Assad and Binyamin Netanyahu should be friends. Probably
including Vladimir Putin - a winsome trio, Indeed.
We need a World War against Islamic anti-Semitism.
American and Israeli Jews who support the Israeli peace camp are
worse than Kapos. (Kapo, short for Kamp-Polizei, or "camp police", were
camp inmates enlisted by the Nazis to uphold order in the death-camps,
until they themselves were put to death.) This applies specifically to
the mild and inoffensive "J Street" organization.
It also, of course, includes me.
IF YOU were inclined to laugh out loud at some of these definitions,
don't. This is no laughing matter.
David Friedman is a serious person. He is a famous bankruptcy lawyer.
But he is not being sent here to deal with the bankruptcy of the
Netanyahu regime. On the contrary, he is sent to facilitate the setting
up of an Israel government in which Netanyahu would constitute the
extreme left. And this is not even an exaggeration.
Since 1967, the Israeli peace camp has prayed for the US to save
Israel from itself. Every new president has been greeted with high
hopes. Here is the man who will compel the government of Israel to give
up the Palestinian territories and make peace with the Palestinians and
the entire Arab world.
President Obama was only the last in line. Intelligent, good-looking,
a rousing orator, full of noble intentions. But the results, as far as
we are concerned, were nil. Yet now we wish that he had a third term.
I was always skeptical of this approach. Why would a US president
stick his neck out to save Israel from itself, if the Israelis
themselves are too lazy or cowardly to do so themselves?
(I have already mentioned lately that once, at an international
conference, I accused the Spanish and European statesman, Miguel
Moratinos, of failing to do so. He answered angrily that it was not his
duty to save us, that it was our duty to save ourselves. I could not but
agree in my heart.)
I have long ago given up any hope that the American administration
will assist us in making a historic peace with the Palestinian people
and in trading the occupied territories for peace. We shall have to do
so ourselves. There is no other solution. The alternative so-called "one
state solution" promises civil war for generations to come.
Anyone who is not blinded by ultra-nationalism and/or messianic
fervor must surely see that. It is so simple.
THE CONQUEST of the remaining Palestinian territories in 1967 plunged
Israel into a delirium that prevents us even today from listening to
reason. The US, for its own reasons, has encouraged Israel to continue
on this course.
President-elect Trump is set to push Israel forwards with all his
might forwards towards its eventual disaster.
Some 2000 years ago a Jewish Rebel called Bar-Kokhba ("Son of the
Stars") rose against almighty Rome. Intoxicated by some initial
victories, he cried out to God: "Don't help us, but at least don't help
our enemies!" God didn't listen, and the rebellion was crushed by the
Romans. The Jewish population of Palestine never recovered, until
I would cry out to Donald Trump: "If you dont help us achieve peace,
at least don't send us this sworn peace-wrecker."
Share the link of this article with your facebook friends