Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Israeli Jewocracy: Netanyahu Merges Apartheid,
Jewishness, and Democracy
By Uri Avnery
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, February 22, 2016
|
|
Haneen Al-Zu'abi, Bassal
Gatas, and Jamal Zahalka visiting families of Palestinians
murdered by Israelis extra-judicially, February 2016 |
|
This is a law against the Arab minority. The Knesset will
be Jewish, pure and simple.
Israel Cannot Be Jewish and Democratic at the Same Time
***
RIGHT AFTER the foundation of Israel, God appeared to David Ben-Gurion
and told him: "You have done good by my people. Utter a wish and I shall
grant it!" "I wish that Israel shall be Jewish, democratic and
encompass all the country between the Mediterranean and the Jordan,"
Ben-Gurion replied. "That is too much even for me!" God exclaimed.
"But I will grant you two of the three. You can choose between a Jewish and
democratic Israel in a part of the country, a democratic state in all of the
country that will not be Jewish or a Jewish Israel in all of the country
that will not be democratic." God has not changed his mind.
WHILE I am writing this, Binyamin Netanyahu is totally
absorbed in enacting a new law, a law that would be a watershed in the
history of Israel. The public looks on in a bemused way, as if it were
happening in Kamchatka. This law would (I might say "will") enable
90 of the 120 Knesset members to evict any or all the other members from the
Knesset altogether. The grounds for such a decision are nebulous: supporting
"terrorism" – by speech as well as by deed, denying the Jewish character of
the state, and such. Who decides? The majority, of course.
The immediate impetus for proposing this bill was provided by the three Arab
Knesset members who visited the parents of Arab (martyrs killed by Israelis)
in annexed East Jerusalem. I have already mentioned this in my last article.
They had a good pretext – to help them to obtain the bodies of their sons,
who had been shot dead on the spot. But the obvious reason was to pay their
condolences. Now, it may be argued that a bereaved mother is a
bereaved mother, irrespective of the cause of her son's death, and that to
offer condolences is a human virtue. But that may be too humanistic for
Likud members. In the good old times, when we were the "terrorists"
and the British were the occupiers, I would certainly have paid my
condolences to a neighbor whose son had been shot during an Irgun raid. I
don't think the British would have arrested me for that. By law,
Knesset members are immune from prosecution for any act committed in the
line of their duties. For Knesset members to visit their voters in such
circumstances may be such an act. Therefore, a new law is necessary.
And what a law! "IMAGINE SUCH a thing happening in England
or the US," Netanyahu thundered, "an MP or congressman supporting
terrorists!" "Imagine such a thing happening in Britain or the US,"
I would reply, "a law allowing three quarters of Parliament or Congress to
evict the others!" Netanyahu was brought up in the US. He most
surely has been taught there that democracy does not mean only the rule of
the majority. Adolf Hitler was probably supported by the majority. Democracy
means that the majority respects the rights of minorities. Including the
right of free speech. The right of free speech does not mean the
right to express popular views. Popular views do not need any protection.
Free speech means the right to utter views that are detested by almost
everyone. It certainly means the right of minorities to express
their views by peaceful means. And that is the crux of the matter.
Everybody understands that the right of 90 to evict 30 is a threat to
evict the Arabs from the Knesset. The "Arab" faction in the present Knesset
comprises 13 members and will probably get larger in the next few elections.
(It's a bit complicated. The "Arab" faction includes a Jewish member,
who is much respected. The "Jewish" factions include some token Arab
members, who dare not open their mouth on serious matters.) This is
not a law against "terrorist" sympathizers. This is a law against
the Arab minority. The Knesset will be Jewish, pure and simple.
Going back to God’s deal with Ben-Gurion, It will be a Jewish state in
all of the country, without being democratic. JEWS HAVE BEEN
minorities since the Babylonian exile, some 2500 years ago. All Jews have
been minorities for some thousands of years. One would have believed
that 80 generations are enough to learn how a state should behave towards
minorities. Indeed, one could have believed that all the states of the world
would be sending delegations to Israel to learn how minorities should be
treated. The founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, certainly thought so, and
described the idyllic relations between the Jewish state and its Arab
inhabitants in his futuristic novel "Altneuland" ("Old-New-Land").
Alas, this did not come to be. The times when a young and fresh Israel
attracted progressives from all over the world to see the Kibbutzim and
Moshavim (cooperative villages) are long gone. (It now appears that Bernie
Sanders, one of the US Democratic candidates for president, once was a
volunteer worker in a kibbutz). Even before the proposed law is enacted,
Israel is one of the least democratic countries in the Western World, to
which Israel wants to belong. In the West Bank, which is governed by
Israel, there live about 2.5 million people who are devoid of any civil and
human rights. Just this week Amira Hass, the courageous Israeli chronicler
of the occupation, described how the comfortable home of a Palestinian
bourgeois family was invaded in the middle of the night by an army squad and
they were told to clear their living room, which became an army outpost. The
soldiers brought with them a portable chemical WC, but relieved themselves
freely from the balcony. We believed for a time that
Israel could remain "the only democracy in the Middle East" while holding
large occupied territories. Didn't the British hold hundreds of millions of
Indians in subjugation, while the home country remained the world's shining
example of democracy? Sure, but an Englishman needed several weeks to sail
from Liverpool to Bombay, time enough to change his personality, while one
needs only five minutes to cross from Israel into the West Bank.
THE ARAB citizens of Israel proper constitute some 20% of the population.
These were the remnants of a large majority, most of whom had fled or were
evicted. This percentage has remained so from the beginning of the
state until now, a time in which the population of Israel has grown more
than tenfold. A miracle? Almost. The huge natural increase of the
Arab population has been balance by Jewish immigration, first from the
Islamic countries, then from Russia, and lately from Ethiopia. They are
still 20%, as God foresaw. The first generation of "Israeli Arabs" –
as Jews called them, much to their dismay – were meek and docile, still
shocked by the immense catastrophe that had befallen their people. For
safety's sake, they were subjected to a "military government", which
restricted their movements. An Arab could not go from his village to the
next, much less buy a tractor or send a son to study, without a written
military permit. This system was abolished only after 17 years. One
may wonder why they were granted voting rights at all. Well, since they were
so docile, Ben-Gurion, a party man through and through, decided that they
would bolster his party's majority at the polls. This indeed did
happen. But now there is a third generation of Arab citizens. There
are Arab university professors, chief physicians, entrepreneurs, even police
commanders. There are Palestinian nationalists, Islamists, Communists. They
have feelings, demands, even the chutzpah to demand full equality.
That would be a large enough problem in a normal situation. But the
situation here is not normal. Israel's national minority is a part of the
Palestinian people, whose entire territory the present Israeli leadership
wants to take away. IN THE back of my mind I have a script for a
movie. I am ready to give it away for free. Two Jewish boys,
call then Abraham and David, escape Nazi Germany. David goes to the US,
Abraham goes to Palestine. David, of course, joins the movement of
Martin Luther King, becomes a leading civil rights activist and is now a
fervent campaigner for the rights of minorities. He also supports BDS, which
calls for the boycott of Israel. Abraham, who calls himself Rami,
is a colonel in the Israeli army, a fervent nationalist and regular Likud
voter, an admirer of Netanyahu. By sheer accident (this is a movie, after
all) he once was a member of the kibbutz in which Bernie Sanders was a
volunteer worker. He is in charge of a large part of the West Bank,
and happens to be responsible for the order under which Palestinians are
thrown out of their homes for security purposes. David heads an
American human rights delegation that comes to investigate what’s happening
in the occupied territories, Rami has the task of preventing them getting
there. And so on. COMING BACK to God, He is shaking his head.
These humans, He asks Himself, will they ever learn? No country has
ever profited from throwing out its minorities. Nazi Germany
threw out its Jewish scientists, some of whom went to the US and built the
atomic bomb for America. Long before that, the Catholic kings of France
threw out the Protestant Huguenots, who emigrated to Prussia and turned a
small garrison town named Berlin into a world center of industry and
culture. There are many more examples. If two thousand years
have not taught us anything, when will we ever learn?
***
Share this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|