Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
The Real Goal of the New US-Iranian Alliance Is
Fighting the Islamic State
By Uri
Avnery
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, July
22, 2015
The Treaty AND WHAT if the whole drama was only
an exercise of deception? What if the wily Persians did not even
dream of building an atomic bomb, but used the threat to further their real
aims? What if Binyamin Netanyahu was duped to become unwittingly the
main collaborator of Iranian ambitions? Sounds crazy? Not really.
Let's have a look at the facts. IRAN IS one of the oldest powers in
the world, with thousands of years of political experience. Once they
possessed an empire that spanned the civilized world, including our little
country. Their reputation for clever trade practices is unequaled.
They are much too clever to build a nuclear weapon. What for? It would
devour huge amounts of money. They know that they would never be able to use
it. Same as Israel, with its large stockpile. Netanyahu's nightmare
of an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel is just that – a nightmare (or
daymare) of an ignorant dilettante. Israel is a nuclear power with a solid
second-strike capability. As we see, the Iranian leaders are hard-boiled
realists. Would they even dream of inviting an inevitable Israeli
retaliation that would wipe from the face of the earth their
three-millennia-old civilization? (If this capability is defective,
Netanyahu should be charged and convicted for criminal negligence.)
Even if the Iranians did deceive the whole world and build a nuclear bomb,
nothing would happen except the creation of a "balance of terror", such as
saved the world at the height of the cold war between America and Russia.
The people around Netanyahu pretend to believe that, unlike the
then Soviets, the Iranian mullahs are crazy people. There is absolutely no
evidence for that. Since their 1979 revolution, the Iranian leadership has
not made one single important step that was not absolutely rational.
Compared to American missteps in the region (not to mention the Israeli
ones), the Iranian leadership has been thoroughly logical. So
perhaps they traded their nonexistent nuclear designs for their very real
political design: to become the hegemon of the Muslim world. If so,
they owe a lot to Netanyahu. WHAT HAS the Islamic Republic ever
done in its 45 years of existence to harm Israel? Sure. Tehran
crowds can be seen on television burning Israeli flags and shouting "Death
to Israel". They call us, not flatteringly, "the Little Satan", as compared
to the American "Great Satan". Terrible. But what else? Not
much. Perhaps some support for Hezbollah and Hamas, which were not their
creation. Iran's real fight is against the powers that be in the Muslim
world. They want to turn the region's countries into Iranian vassals, as
they were 2400 years ago. This has very little to do with Islam.
Iran uses Islam as Israel uses Zionism and the Jewish Diaspora (and as
Russia in the past used communism) as a tool for its imperial ambitions.
What is happening now in this region resembles the "religious wars" in
17th century Europe. A dozen countries fought each other in the name of
religion, under the flags of Catholicism and Protestantism, but in reality
using religion to further their very earthly imperial designs. The
US, led by a bunch of neocon fools, destroyed Iraq, which for many centuries
had served as the bulwark of the Arab world against Iranian expansion. Now,
under the banner of the Shia, Iran is expanding its power all over the
Region. Shiite Iraq is now to a large extent an Iranian vassal
(we'll come back to Daesh). The leaders of Syria, a Sunni country ruled by a
small semi-Shiite sect, depend on Iran for their survival. In Lebanon, the
Shiite Hezbollah is a close ally with growing power and prestige. So is
Hamas in Gaza, which is entirely Sunni. And the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who
are Zaidis (a school of the Shia.) The status quo in the Arab world
is defended by a corrupt bunch of dictators and medieval sheiks, such as the
rulers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Gulf oil potentates. Clearly,
Iran and its allies are the wave of the future, Saudi Arabia and its allies
belong to the past. That leaves Daesh, the Sunni "Islamic State" in
Syria and Iraq. That is also a rising power. Unlike Iran, whose
revolutionary élan long ago exhausted itself, Daesh is radiating
revolutionary fervor, attracting adherents from all over the world.
Daesh is the real enemy of Iran – and of Israel.
PRESIDENT OBAMA and his advisors
realized this some time ago. Their new alliance with Iran is partly based on
this reality. With the advent of Daesh,
realities on the ground have changed completely. The shift reaffirms the old
British maxim that one's enemies in one war can well become one's allies in
the next, and vice versa. Far from being naïve, Obama is building an
alliance against the new and very dangerous enemy. This alliance should
logically include Bashar Assad's Syria, but Obama is still afraid of saying
so aloud. Obama and his advisors also believe that with the lifting
of the crippling sanctions, Iranians will concentrate on making money,
lessening their nationalist and religious fervor even more. That sounds
reasonable enough. (Netanyahu thinks the American people are
"naïve". Well, for a naïve nation the US has done quite well in
becoming the world's only super-power.) One by-product of the
situation is that Israel is again at loggerheads with the entire political
world. The Vienna treaty was signed not just by the US, but by all leading
world powers. This seems to create the situation described by a jolly
popular Israeli song: "The whole world is against us / But we don't give a
damn…" Unfortunately, unlike Obama, Netanyahu is stuck in the past.
He continues demonizing Iran, instead of joining it in the fight against
Daesh, which is far, far more dangerous to Israel. One does not have
to go back to Cyrus the Great (6th century B.C.) to realize that Iran can be
a close ally. In the relations between nations, geography trumps religion.
Not so long ago, Iran was Israel's closest ally in the region. We even sent
Khomeini arms to fight Iraq. The Mullahs hate Israel not so much because of
their religion, but because of our alliance with the Shah. The
present Iranian regime has long since lost its revolutionary religious
fervor. It is acting according to its national interests. Geography still
counts. A wise Israeli government would use the next ten-or-more years of a
guaranteed nuclear-free Iran in order to renew the alliance – especially
against Daesh. This could mean new relations with Assad's Syria,
Hezbollah and Hamas too. BUT SUCH far-reaching considerations
are far from the mind of Netanyahu, the son of a historian, who is devoid of
any historical knowledge or intuition. The fight is now going to
Washington DC, where Netanyahu will be fully committed as a mercenary of
Sheldon Adelson, the owner of the Republican Party. It is a sorry
sight: the State of Israel, which has always enjoyed the full unblinking
support of both American parties, has become an appendix of the reactionary
Republican leadership. One victim of this is the legend of the
"invincible" pro-Israeli lobby. This crucial asset has now been lost. From
now on, AIPAC will be just one of the many lobbies on Capitol Hill.
AN EVEN sorrier sight is Israel's political and media elite on the
morrow of the signing of the Vienna treaty. It was almost incredible.
Almost all political parties fell in line with Netanyahu's policy, competing
with each other in their demonstrations of abject loyalty. From the "leader
of the opposition", the pitiful Yitzhak Herzog, to the voluble Yair Lapid,
everybody rushed to support the Prime Minister at this crucial hour.
The media were even worse. Almost all prominent commentators, left and
right, ran amok against the 'disastrous" treaty and heaped their uniform
disgust and contempt on poor Obama, as if reading from a prepared government
"list of arguments" (as indeed they were). Not the finest hour of
Israeli democracy and the much lauded "Jewish brain". Just a despicable
example of all-too-common brain-washing. Some would call it presstitution.
One of Netanyahu's arguments is that the Iranians can and will
cheat the naive Americans and build the bomb. He is sure that this is
possible. Well, he should know. We did it, didn't we?
***
Share this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|