Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
The US Geostrategic Objectives Behind the War in
Yemen
By Abdus Sattar Ghazali
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, April 13, 2015
The United States is supplying intelligence to the Saudi-led
coalition bombing rebel positions in Yemen and will expedite arms supplies
to the alliance, Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken said in the Saudi
capital Riyadh on Tuesday. After talks with the Saudi officials, Blinken
told reporters that Saudi Arabia was sending a "strong message to the
Houthis and their allies that they cannot overrun Yemen by force".
"As part of that effort, we have expedited weapons deliveries, we have
increased our intelligence sharing, and we have established a joint
coordination planning cell in the Saudi operation centre."
The US Deputy Secretary of State's comments came hours after the
International Committee of the Red Cross flew medical personnel for the
first time into Yemen amid delays that have worsened the humanitarian
situation in Aden. Fierce fighting between militias loyal to Hadi and and
the Houthis has been raging in the port city for days, according to Al
Jazeera.
Human catastrophe More than a 100,000 people
have fled their homes after the Saudi-led coalition launched air strikes in
Yemen, according to UNICEF, the UN agency responsible for children
welfare. A spokesman from the agency, Rajat Madhok, told Al Jazeera that
most of those who have been displaced are women and children. "Most
displacements have taken place from and within al-Dhale, Abyan, Amran,
Saada, Hajja. The displaced persons are mostly being hosted with relatives,"
Madhok said. In a statement published on Tuesday, UNICEF said 74
children caught up in fighting had been killed and another 44 maimed since
March 26. "These are conservative figures and UNICEF believes that the
total number of children killed is much higher," the statement read.
On April 2, Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency
Relief Coordinator Valerie Amos issued a statement saying: “Reports from
humanitarian partners in different parts of the country indicate that some
519 people have been killed and nearly 1,700 injured in the past two weeks –
over 90 of them children.Tens of thousands of people have fled their homes,
some by crossing the sea to Djibouti and Somalia. .Electricity, water and
essential medicines are in short supply.” Yemen already is the
region’s poorest country with around 26 million population. War exacerbated
things greatly. The World Food Program says about 13 million Yemenis have
only polluted water for drinking and other uses. Around a million aged-five
or under Yemeni children are malnourished. Expect the number to grow
exponentially in coming weeks and months. This is not a
Shia-Sunni conflict
As usual, western media is misinforming about the latest conflict in the
Middle East. It is projecting the Yemen conflict as Shia-Sunni strife since
the Houthis forced President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi to flee to Saudi Arabia.
Itt is also reported as Saudi bid to curtail or counter the Iranian
influence which has reportedly supported the Houthis. This may be true to
some extent but the real agenda behind the US-backed Saudi effort to
reinstall the ousted President Hadi. Interestingly, the US has always
double standard when it comes to supporting the so-called democracy around
the world. In Yemen it is supporting restoring its client government of
President Hadi who was “elected” after overthrowing his predecessor
President Ali Abdullah Saleh in a coup. He was the only candidate for the
office on the ballot. Not surprisingly in the circumstance, he “won” more
than 99 percent of the vote. However, in Ukraine, a democratically
elected President (Yanukovych) was chased by a mob from his office and a
client fascist government was installed. Yanukovych was elected in a
contested election judged to be “free and fair” by international monitoring
bodies. Now the US says that by leaving the country Yanukovych lost
legitimacy. While a fleeing Yemeni president has not lost legitimacy and the
US is backing Saudi attacks on Yemen in the name of democracy. Now
let us see who are the Houthis, a Zaydi sect of Shia Muslims and how the
current crisis developed. The current strife led by the Houthis was in the
making for at least a decade. The Houthis and their allies represent a
diverse cross-section of Yemeni society and the majority of Yemenites. At
present the domestic alliance against Al-Hadi includes Shia Muslims and
Sunni Muslims alike. The Houthis organized themselves in the early
1990s as a secular progressive group of “Young Believers”. Like Hezbollah of
Lebanon, they helped poor communities and organized youth camps in the
northern Saada province. With President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s pro-US
government becoming increasingly repressive against any popular reform
movement, the Houtis grew rapidly into an army of young men, soon becoming a
dominating force in the North. They were seeking democracy, openly opposing
the US-Saudi supported dictator, who was kept in power by Washington since
1978. The Houthis organized a first uprising against the Saleh Government in
2004, but were defeated by Saleh’s brutal army with heavy backing by the
Saudi tyrants. The Houthis emerged as a mass movement against
President Saleh in 2011. Under continuous popular and Houthi pressure and
with Washington’s nod, President Saleh finally stepped down in February
2012, ceding power to his Vice President Abd Rabbuh Mansur
Hadi. President Ali Abdullah Saleh was in power since 1978. He amassed $60
billion during his long corrupt rule, according to a UN report released in
February 2015. When Hadi became Yemeni president he dragged his feet
and was working against the implementation of the arrangements that had been
arranged through consensus and negotiations in Yemen’s National Dialogue,
which convened after Ali Abdullah Saleh was forced to hand over his power.
The Houthis pressed for a more egalitarian representation in parliament.
They attracted small parties and like-minded splinter groups to form a
coalition and eventually succeeded in taking control by storming government
buildings and Parliament in January 2015. Hadi resigned, fled to his native
Aden and eventually received safe haven in Saudi Arabia. The Houtis hastily
formed a five-member transition government and intended to write a new
Constitution with democratic principles. However, Washington would not
tolerate a non-client government in the strategic southern tip of the Arab
Peninsula. On March 25, Saudis, with the blessings of Washington,
launched airstrikes in Yemen with the professed objective of restoring the
ousted President Hadi who had resigned when the Houthis seized the
Presidential palace in January 2015. Saudi Arabia has formed a coalition of
more than 10 countries try to restore President Hadi's government. The
coalition includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE),
Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Sudan. Yemen is a growing reminder of
just how important the strategic U.S. partnership with Saudi Arabia really
is, says Anthony Cordesmanof the Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) in Washington. It is one thing to talk about the war against
ISIS, and quite another to realize that U.S. strategic interests require a
broad level of stability in the Gulf and Arabian Peninsula and one that is
dependent on Saudi Arabia as a key strategic partner. The
US, Saudi geo-political interests in Yemen
While the House of Saudi has long considered Yemen a subordinate province
of some sorts and as a part of Riyadh’s sphere of influence, the US wants to
make sure that it could control the Bab Al-Mandeb, the Gulf of Aden, and the
Socotra Islands, argues Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya. The Bab Al-Mandeb is an
important strategic chokepoint for international maritime trade and energy
shipments that connects the Persian Gulf via the Indian Ocean with the
Mediterranean Sea via the Red Sea. It is just as important as the Suez Canal
for the maritime shipping lanes and trade between Africa, Asia, and Europe.
Added to the geopolitical importance of Yemen in overseeing strategic
maritime corridors is its military’s missile arsenal. Yemen’s missiles could
hit any ships in the Gulf of Aden or Bab Al-Mandeb. In this regard, the
Saudi attack on Yemen’s strategic missile depots serves both US and Israeli
interests. The aim is not only to prevent them from being used to retaliate
against exertions of Saudi military force, but to also prevent them from
being available to a Yemeni government aligned to either Iran, Russia, or
China. For Anthony
Cordesman, Yemen does not match the strategic importance of the Gulf,
but it is still of great strategic importance to the stability of Saudi
Arabia and the Arabian Peninsula. It is critical to note that far more is
involved than energy: the cost and security of every cargo that goes through
the Suez canal, the security of U.S. and other allied combat ships moving
through the canal, the economic stability of Egypt, and the security of
Saudi Arabia's key port at Jeddah and major petroleum export facility
outside the Gulf. The Energy Information Administration describes the energy
impact of importance of this chokepoint as follows: -The Bab
el-Mandeb Strait is a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle
East, and it is a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and the
Indian Ocean. The strait is located between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea,
and connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Most
exports from the Persian Gulf that transit the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline
also pass through Bab el-Mandeb.
-An estimated 3.8 million bbl/d of crude oil and refined petroleum
products flowed through this waterway in 2013 toward Europe, the United
States, and Asia, an increase from 2.9 million bbl/d in 2009. Oil shipped
through the strait decreased by almost one-third in 2009 because of the
global economic downturn and the decline in northbound oil shipments to
Europe. Northbound oil shipments increased through Bab el-Mandeb Strait in
2013, and more than half of the traffic, about 2.1 million bbl/d, moved
northbound to the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline.
-The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is 18 miles wide at its narrowest point,
limiting tanker traffic to two 2-mile-wide channels for inbound and outbound
shipments. Closure of the Bab el-Mandeb could keep tankers from the Persian
Gulf from reaching the Suez Canal or SUMED Pipeline, diverting them around
the southern tip of Africa, adding to transit time and cost. In addition,
European and North African southbound oil flows could no longer take the
most direct route to Asian markets via the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb.
Any hostile air or sea presence in Yemen could threaten the entire
traffic through the Suez Canal, as well as a daily flow of oil and petroleum
products that the EIA estimates increased from 2.9 mmb/d in 2009 to 3.8
mmb/d in 2013. Such a threat also can be largely covert or indirect. Libya
demonstrated this under Qaddafi when he had a cargo ship drop mines in the
Red Sea. The archipelago of Socotra
Maritime trade from East and Southern Africa to Western Europe also
transits within proximity of the Yemeni archipelago of Socotra (Suqutra),
through the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. Socotra in the Indian Ocean is
located some 80 kilometres off the Horn of Africa and 380 kilometres South
of the Yemeni coastline. A military base in Socotra could be used to oversee
the movement of vessels including war ships in an out of the Gulf of Aden.
The Socotra archipelago is part of the Great Game opposing Russia and
America. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union had a military presence in
Socotra, which at the time was part of South Yemen, says Prof Michel
Chossudovsky of the Global Research. In 2009, the Russians entered into
renewed discussions with the Yemeni government regarding the establishment
of a Naval base on Socotra island. In January, 2010, the
then-President Ali Abdullah Saleh and General David Petraeus, Commander of
the US Central Command met for high level discussions behind closed doors.
Several reports confirmed that the Saleh-Petraeus meetings were intent upon
redefining US military involvement in Yemen including the establishment of a
full-fledged military base on the island of Socotra. The Iranian news agency
Fars reported that president Ali Abdullah Saleh had “surrendered Socotra
for Americans who would set up a military base.” Following the
Petraeus-Saleh meeting, a Russian Navy communiqué “confirmed that Russia did
not give up its plans to have bases for its ships on Socotra island.
In short, to borrow former World Bank official Peter Koenig, "domination of
Yemen is an important step on the Zionist-Anglo-Saxon Empire’s path towards
world hegemony. Like Ukraine, Yemen is just another square on the
geopolitical chess board which the exceptional nation aims to dominate.
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Chief Editor of the Journal of America (www.journalofamerica.net)
Email: asghazali2011 (@) gmail.com
***
Share this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|