Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Rouhani Was Condemned by Netanyahu Even
Before Speaking About Peace!
By Uri Avnery
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 30, 2013
The Real Bomb
YEARS AGO, I disclosed one of the biggest secrets about Iran: Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad was an agent of the Mossad. Suddenly, all the curious
details of his behavior made sense. His public fantasies about the
disappearance of Israel. His denial of the Holocaust, which until then had
been typical only of a lunatic fringe. His boasting about Iran’s nuclear
capabilities. Cui bono? Who had an interest in all this nonsense?
There is only one sensible answer: Israel. His posturing
depicted Iran as a state which was both ridiculous and sinister. It
justified Israel’s refusal to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or
to ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention. It diverted attention from
Israel’s refusal to discuss the occupation of the Palestinian territories
or hold meaningful peace negotiations. ANY DOUBT that I may have
felt about this international scoop has evaporated now. Our
political and military leaders almost openly bemoan the demise of
Ahmadinejad. Obviously, the Supreme Guide, Ali Khamenei, decided
that I was right and has quietly disposed of this clown. Worse,
he has reaffirmed his deadly enmity to the Zionist Entity by pushing
forward a person like Hassan Rouhani. Rouhani is the very opposite
of his predecessor. If the Mossad had been asked to sketch the worst
possible Iranian leader Israel could imagine, they would have come up with
someone like him. An Iranian who recognizes and condemns the
Holocaust! An Iranian man who offers sweetness and light! An Iranian who
wishes peace and friendship on all nations – even hinting that Israel
could be included, if only we give up the occupied Palestinian
territories! Could you imagine anything worse? I AM not
joking. This is deadly serious! Even
before Rouhani could open his mouth after his election, he was condemned
outright by Binyamin Netanyahu. A wolf
in sheep’s clothing! A real anti-Semite! A cheat out to deceive the whole
world! A devious politician whose devilish aim is to drive a wedge between
Israel and the naive Americans! This is the real Iranian bomb,
far more threatening than the nuclear one that will be built behind the
smokescreen of Rouhani’s sweet talk! A nuclear bomb can be
deterred by another nuclear bomb. But how do you deter a Rouhani?
Yuval Steinitz, our failed former Minister of Finance and at present
responsible for our “strategic thinking” (yes, really!) exclaimed in
despair that the world wants to be deceived by Iran. Binyamin Netanyahu
called it a “honey trap”. Commentators who are hand-fed by “official
circles” (i.e. the Prime Minister’s Office) proclaim that he is an
existential threat. All this before he had uttered a word.
WHEN ROUHANI at long last made his Grand Speech at the UN General
Assembly, all the dire forebodings were confirmed. Where
Ahmadinejad had set off a stampede of delegates from the hall, Rouhani
packed them in. Diplomats from all over the world were curious about the
man. They could have read the speech a few minutes later, but they wanted
to see and hear for themselves. Even the US sent officials to be present.
No one left.
No one, that is, except the Israelis.
The Israeli diplomats were instructed by
Netanyahu to leave the hall demonstratively when the Iranian started to
speak. That was a stupid gesture. As
rational and as effective as a little boy’s tantrum when his favorite toy
is taken away. Stupid, because it painted Israel as a spoiler, at
a time when the entire world is seized by an attack of optimism after the
recent events in Damascus and Tehran. Stupid, because it proclaims
the fact that Israel is at present totally isolated. BY THE way,
did anyone notice that Rouhani was constantly wiping his brow during his
half-hour speech? The man was obviously suffering. Did another Mossad
agent sneak into the UN maintenance room and shut down the
air-conditioning? Or was it just the heavy robes? I never became a
priest, not only because I am an atheist (in common with many priests, I
suspect) but also because of this obligation to wear the heavy clothes
which all creeds demand. Same goes for diplomats. After all,
priests and diplomats are human beings, too! (Many of them, at least.)
ONLY ONE Israeli cabinet member dared to criticize the Israeli exit
openly. Ya’ir Lapid. What has come over him? Well, polls show that the
rising star is not rising any more. As Minister of Finance he has been
compelled to take very unpopular steps. Since he does not speak about
things like the occupation and peace, he is considered shallow. He has
almost been pushed aside. His blunt criticism of Netanyahu may bring him
back into the center. However, he has put his finger on a central
fact: that Netanyahu and his crew behave exactly as the Arab diplomats
used to do a generation ago. Meaning, they are stuck in the past. They
don’t live in the present. Living in the present needs something
politicians are loath to do: thinking again. Things are changing.
Slowly, very slowly, but perceptibly. It is far too early to say
much about the Decline of the American Empire, but one does not need a
seismograph to perceive some movement in that direction. The
Syrian affair was a good example. Vladimir Putin likes to be photographed
in judo poses. In judo, one exploits the momentum of one’s opponent to
bring him down. That is exactly what Putin did. President Obama
has painted himself into a corner. He mouthed belligerent threats and
could not retreat, though the US public is in no belligerent mood. Putin
released him from the dilemma. For a price. I don’t know if Putin
is such an agile player that he pounced on a side remark by John Kerry
about Bashar Assad’s chance of relinquishing his chemical weapons. I
rather suspect that it was all arranged in advance. Either way, Obama got
off the hook and Putin was in the game again. I have very mixed
feelings about Putin. He has done to his Chechen citizens very much what
Assad is doing to his Sunni citizens. His treatment of dissidents, such as
the Pussy Riot band, is abominable. But on the international
stage, Putin is now the peacemaker. He has taken the sting out of the
chemical weapons’ crisis, and may quite possibly take the initiative in
providing a political settlement for that dreadful civil war. The
next step could well be to play a similar role in the Iranian crisis. If
Khamenei has come to the conclusion that his nuclear program may not be
worth the economic misery of the sanctions, he may well sell it to the US.
In this case, Putin can play a vital role, mediating between two tough
traders who have a lot to trade. (Unless, of course, Obama
behaves like the American who bought a carpet in a Persian bazaar. The
seller asked for 1000 dollars, and the American paid up without haggling.
When told that the carpet was worth no more than a hundred dollars, he
answered: “I know, but I wanted to punish him. Now he won’t be able to
sleep, cursing himself for not asking 5000 dollars.”) HOW DO we
fit into this changing scene? First of all, we must start
thinking, much as we would prefer to avoid it. New circumstances demand
new thoughts. In his own US speech,
Obama made a clear connection between the Iranian bomb and the Israeli
occupation. This linkage cannot be unlinked. Let’s grasp it.
The US is today a bit less important than it was yesterday. Russia is a
bit more important than it was. As its futile attack on Capitol Hill
during the Syrian crisis shows, AIPAC is also less powerful.
Let’s think again about Iran. It’s too early to conclude how far Tehran is
moving, if at all. But we need to try. Walking out of rooms is not a
policy. Entering rooms is. If we could restore some of our former
relationship with Tehran, or even just take the sting out of the present
one, that would be a huge gain for Israel. Combining this with a real
peace initiative vis-a-vis the Palestinians would be even better.
Our present course is leading towards disaster. The present changes in the
international and the regional scenes can make a change of course
possible. Let’s help President Obama
change American policy, instead of using AIPAC to terrorize Congress into
blindly supporting an outdated policy towards Iran and Palestine.
Let’s extend cautious feelers towards Russia. Let’s change our public
stance, as the leaders of Iran are doing with such success. Are
they more clever than us?
|
|
|