Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Nakba Revisited:
Tragedy of Syria's Palestinians and
Centrality of Right of Return
By Ramzy Baroud
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, January 1, 2013
It must have been 2007, although I cannot remember the exact
date. I do recall getting lost in what seemed like a futile search for the
headquarters of the United Nations World Food Program (WFP) in Rome. There
was a meeting of NGOs and some General Assembly body, consisting of
several UN ambassadors, dedicated to the ‘Question of Palestine’. I was
asked to attend on behalf of one NGO. Timidly, I agreed. Knowing
in advance how such meetings often conclude – reiterating old statements,
rehashing old text, reaffirming this and reasserting that – I still
attended. The subject of the discussion was the Palestinian refugees, who,
for most Palestinians, aside from Mahmoud Abbas’ Palestinian Authority,
still represent the core of any just solution to a decades-long
Palestinian struggle for freedom and rights. I was compelled by a greater
sense of urgency than the need to restate and reconfirm official UN text.
A few days earlier in London, I had received a worrying call. The
caller was a young Palestinian man named Hossam who was stranded at the
Jordan-Iraq border. Two of his brothers had been killed in Iraq in recent
months. One was executed in the Baladiat neighborhood in Baghdad, which
then hosted mostly Palestinian refugees. The other was killed by US
forces. Before the US invasion of 2003, a small community of
35,000 Palestinians resided in Iraq. They were intentionally shielded from
any political involvement in the country and unlike Palestinian refugees
in Lebanon were treated well. But when the US invaded, they became an easy
target for various militias, US forces and criminal gangs. Many were
killed, especially those who couldn’t afford paying heavy ransoms
haphazardly imposed by gunmen. Most of the refugees fled, seeking safe
havens in Iraq and when that was no longer possible, they sought shelter
in neighboring countries. Allowing Palestinians entry into Arab
countries is not so simple. For this reason thousands were stranded in
newly constructed refugee camps at the Jordanian and Syrian borders. They
subsisted, some for years, fighting the elements in punishing deserts and
surviving on UN handouts. Finally, many of them were sent to various
non-Arab countries. It was a pitiful spectacle of an Arab betrayal of
Palestinians. The more passionate Arab regimes seem to speak of Palestine,
the more inconsiderate they actually are of the plight of Palestinians.
History has been consistently cruel this way. Hossam simply wanted
to cross back to Jordan. He was born and raised there, but his residence
was capriciously terminated as often is the case when Palestinian refugees
grow in number to pose a demographic concern to the host country. He asked
me to help, pleading that his mother was old and that he was the only
remaining son. Of course, I was, and remain powerless. However,
when I was asked to attend the Rome meeting on the plight of Palestinian
refugees, I thought it would be a suitable platform for Hossam’s hardship
to be placed within an urgent political context. It turned out not to be
because the old textbook prevailed over seemingly trivial present
concerns. Iraq’s Palestinian refugees belonged in Palestine. Those
with the moral courage to say so, such as the UN ambassadors in Rome, have
no power except for giving fervent speeches. Those capable of enacting
long-neglected UN resolutions that insist on the Right for Return for
Palestinian refugees are submissive before US domineering pressure and
Israel’s resolve in denying entry to the land’s native population. UN
Resolution 194 of Dec. 11, 1948 remains ink on paper. As long as
Israel continues to flout international law, millions of Palestinian
refugees will remain captive in regional struggles that use them as
political fodder or see them as a demographic problem, or even worse, a
threat. And with the US ensuring that no meaningful action is ever taken
to alleviate the suffering of the refugees, thousands will continue to
find themselves at some border, queuing for food and pleading their cases
to anyone willing to listen. Syria is now the latest episode of
that long drawn tragedy, which is being manifested in unprecedented ways
since the Lebanese civil war (1975-1990) and the Israeli invasions of
Lebanon (1978 and 1982). There are twelve refugee camps in Syria. Nine of
them are registered as official camps by the UN Relief and Works Agency
(UNRWA) and have a population of more than 496,000 refugees. Yarmouk
alone, near Damascus, hosts an estimated 150,000 refugees. This camp has
been a recurring target for various militant groups and Syrian forces.
Other camps have also been targeted in the brutal conflict, including
Dera’a, Husseinieh and Neirab among others. Hundreds of
Palestinians have been killed in Syria. They were either caught in the
bloody conflict between the Syrian government and the opposition, or were
purposely targeted for one pretext or another. The most recent violence,
which nearly emptied Yarmouk, began on Dec. 14 when Islamist militants
reportedly attacked Palestinian fighters loyal to the Syrian government of
President Bashar Assad. A counterattack involving an airstrike left
Yarmouk littered with many dead and wounded. An exodus followed and a new
chapter of the Palestinian odyssey was being forcefully written, draped
with blood and more atrocious memories. Tens of thousands fled. Some made
it to the very crowded Palestinian camps in Lebanon. Others were refused
entry, only to camp in Damascus parks, once more queuing for UN handouts.
The World Food Programs seems to be in charge of feeding the refugees.
According to a recent statement, the UN group is coordinating its effort
with UNRWA, the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC), UN Children’s Agency
UNICEF, and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). No
words can adequately describe the plight of millions of innocent Syrian
refugees caught in a regional power play that has no regard whatsoever for
three million refugees displaced internally or in neighboring countries.
But the situation for Palestinians, in Syria and elsewhere, continues to
be a sheer side note whenever conflicts ensue in Arab countries – as it
was in Jordan, Lebanon, Kuwait, Iraq, Libya and now Syria. It is the same
old story which is yet to be decisively dealt with as a political
humanitarian crisis and not just a transitory one. Palestinian
leadership bears much responsibility, as it downgraded the urgency of the
refugee crisis, thus The Right of Return, into something like an enigma
that would be unraveled in one way or another during the final status
talks between it and Israel. There were no such talks, of course, and per
the leaked Palestine Papers, it appears that the PA had completely
disowned the refugees in secret talks with Israeli officials. Most
of the Syrian Palestinian refugees were driven from their homes in
Palestine in stages. The first wave arrived in 1948, mostly from Safad,
Haifa and Yaffa. The second after Israel’s occupation of the Golan Heights
in 1967 and the third during Lebanon’s civil war and Israel’s wars on
Lebanon. It is multilayered, protracted tragedy. True, it requires
doubling efforts to protect and care for the refugees, but it also demands
a serious reexamination of the international community’s dismissive
attitude towards the refugees. Palestinian refugees are not simply fleeing
multitudes caught in Arab conflicts, but they represent a grave political
and moral crisis in their own right which requires immediate action guided
by Palestinian rights as enshrined in international law.
Paradoxically, it was Israel's U.N. Ambassador Ron Prosor who placed the
Right of Return in a political context in his response to Security Council
members’ disapproval of Israel’s planned expansion of illegal Jewish
settlements in Jerusalem. On Dec. 20, Prosor argued that it was not the
expansion of the illegal settlements that should be considered a hurdle to
peace, but Palestinians’ insistent on their Right of Return. It was both
odd and expectedly insensitive. While Israel continues to ethnically
cleanse Palestinians to make room for Jewish settlers, refugees in Syria
and Lebanon are fighting for survival as three generations of refugees
have done in the last 64 years. Somehow, demanding the rights of
frightened children and pleading mothers according to international law
pose further threat to Israel’s version of ‘peace’. If the tragedy
of the refugees in Iraq seemed insufficient to iterate the centrality of
the Palestinian refugee crisis, and the inalienable right of those
refugees, the unfolding calamity that has befallen them in Syria should
leave no doubt that the refugee issue is an integral part of the
Palestinian narrative as it should in any serious political discourse.
The Right of Return is not simply a reminiscent discussion of
sentimental history and memories of a dying generation. It deserves to be
treated as an extremely urgent political priority with an equally pressing
humanitarian dimension. Palestinians are once more dying and on the run
and all sincere actions have to be geared towards helping those refugees
cope with the conflict in Syria and return to their homeland in Palestine.
- Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of
PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is: My Father was A Freedom
Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press).
|
|
|