Newly declassified FBI
files are shining an inconvenient light on Israel’s nuclear
weaponization research program and how it has been secretly funded
from the United States. Iranian negotiations with the UN Security
Council resume on May 23 in Baghdad following initial sessions in
Istanbul. The core issue is whether Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT) signatory Iran will agree to abandon uranium enrichment and open
its hardened facilities to more intrusive international inspections.
Israel and its western lobbying organizations have long insisted —
with little concrete proof — that Iran has a clandestine weaponization
program. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is diligently
setting out
legislative tripwires for mandatory US military attacks if Iran
fails to abandon its program. Yet the brazen activities of the
Weizmann Institute of Science now publicly documented by the FBI
reveal violations of the core principle of the NPT. On April 24, 2012
the FBI released 159 pages detailing a secret 1992 counterespionage
investigation into the Weizmann Institute of Science of Rehovot,
Israel. The previously unreleased files detail not only how Israel’s
nuclear fundraising and influence network has pushed the US out of
compliance with the NPT, but also how the US government has
continually missed opportunities to take timely and warranted law
enforcement action.
In October of 1992 military personnel at the Yuma Proving Ground,
which tests nearly every significant US ground combat weapons system,
detected a University of Buffalo computer system user penetrating
their secure computer network via New Mexico State University. A
senior majoring in Chemical Engineering hacked the UB system to obtain
high-level graduate student access codes. Soon after the BU hacking
incident "computers from the Weizmann Institute for Science accessed
computers from NM SU to penetrate computers at YPG" using the stolen
access codes. FBI investigators suspected the BU student, arrested by
Amherst Town police on October 8, 1992, passed the secret access codes
to Weizmann.
In January of 1993 the FBI interviewed UB graduate students whose
accounts had been misappropriated by the hacker. The FBI began to
research the student’s connection to other hackers in Texas and Hawaii
and his "possible contact/association with the Weizmann Institute of
Rehovot, Israel." Investigators also dialed up Lexis-Nexis for more
background on Weizmann. Among their first hits was a 1972
New York Times article recording Soviet
charges that Weizmann was nothing more than a front for Israeli
nuclear weapons research. Interest piqued, the FBI amassed a lengthy
public source file (PDF) on Weizmann.
They discovered that the Weizmann Institute launched operations at
the close of WWII under the direction of Israeli nuclear research
pioneer Ernst David Bergmann. It was named after famed chemist Chaim
Weizmann, a Russian who immigrated to the UK and revolutionized the
production of acetone needed for WWI gunpowder production. The Zionist
activist lobbied and
charmed Lord Balfour to win the creation of a Jewish state in
Palestine and became Israel’s first president in 1949.
The FBI noted the Weizmann Institute had "’an American Committee
for the Weizmann Institute’ which operates in the United States from
New York City, Chicago, and possibly other metropolitan cities. The
Committee engages in fund-raising, hosts lectures on topics of
interest and engages in public relations on behalf of the Weizmann
Institute." The FBI Counter-Intelligence division, after reviewing the
public and private records of its key officials and activities,
submitted a frank written assessment. "CI-3B believes that the
Weizmann Institute is an academic organization which conducts research
in high-technology issue areas, including theoretical aspects of
nuclear and conventional weapons development."
On March 8, 1993 the Assistant District Attorney of Erie County
reduced the unnamed BU hacker "misuse of a computer" charge to
"disorderly conduct," fined him $145 and sentenced him to 40 hours of
community service. BU college officials were not "overly anxious" to
have their student charged of an actual crime, including possible
espionage with Weizmann, rather than a mere campus computer access
violation. The FBI continued its Weizmann Institute spy network
investigation, obtaining a Grand Jury subpoena on March 19, 1993
served on an unnamed suspect at his place of business. The Counter
Intelligence Division obtained logs of Yuma Proving Ground data that
may have been passed to Weizmann. Late in 1994 the investigation was
closed due to the "rudimentary" level of the "computer cracker"
intrusion, which had already been successfully prosecuted. The
"Weizmann Espionage" case officially closed.
In hindsight, what the FBI uncovered in the 1990′s about the
Weizmann Institute clearly documents that it was both involved in
nuclear weapons development and fundraising through a US non-profit
charity. That pile of evidence has only deepened in intervening years.
If the FBI had kept digging, and the Justice Department upheld its
mandate, the threat posed to US NPT compliance could have been
mitigated by shutting down the Weizmann Institute’s US fundraising arm
over documented IRS charitable purpose violations.
But Weizmann was no easy target. Since its very beginning, the
Weizmann Institute invested significant resources courting elite
collaborators and allies spread across US government and scientific
communities. Isidor Rabi worked on the Manhattan Project providing key
leadership developing America’s first atomic bombs alongside Robert
Oppenheimer at Los Alamos. When dispatched by a nervous JFK to visit
Dimona in 1961, Rabi stated unequivocally he had found "no evidence of
weapons related activity." The 2009 book
Nuclear Express authors Thomas C. Reed
and Danny B. Stillman skeptically noted "Rabi was already a member of
the board of governors (and presumably on the payroll) of Israel’s
Weizmann Institute of Science, the incubator of most nuclear weapons
work in Israel." Rabi’s misleading testimony took some heat off Israel
as it raced to finalize the Dimona reactor and build an arsenal.
Abraham Feinberg, a
big-time Democratic Party operative and David Ben-Gurion’s designated
North American nuclear fund-raising coordinator, began courting Nobel
laureate Glenn T. Seaborg on behalf of the Weizmann Institute in the
early 1950′s. After becoming head of the Atomic Energy Commission
during the Kennedy administration, Seaborg played a key role in
derailing effective AEC and FBI criminal investigations into the
Israeli theft of AEC bomb-grade
U-235 from the NUMEC facility in Apollo, Pennsylvania. Upon
leaving the AEC in 1971, Seaborg accepted Weizmann Institute chairman
Abraham Feinberg’s invitation (and an honorarium equivalent to nearly
10% of his annual salary) to keynote the annual Waldorf Astoria event.
Seaborg affirmed a newly hatched US policy of covering-up
Israel’s arsenal. "During my tenure as Chairman of the AEC I was asked
on numerous occasions whether I thought Israel was a nuclear power —
or less euphemistically — did she have the bomb?…Now in retrospect, I
often wished I had said, ‘Yes, she is a nuclear power, the kind that
knows of, and makes use of, the atom’s power for peace.’" When the
NUMEC uranium theft diversion investigation was rejuvenated by
Attorney General Edward Levi in 1976, Seaborg refused to talk to FBI
agents after DOE officials
confirmed
(PDF) to him that traces of NUMEC U-235 had been recovered in Israel.
But who actually hatched the US presidential policy of covering up for
Israel’s nukes?
During the Nixon administration, Henry Kissinger played a key role
in crafting the US policy of "nuclear ambiguity" designed to keep
Israel’s nuclear arsenal from ever becoming an "established
international fact." In 1969 Kissinger penned a
classified strategy document (PDF), even noting the NUMEC uranium
diversion.
"There is circumstantial evidence that some fissionable material
available for Israel’s weapons development was illegally obtained from
the United States by about 1965." But while Kissinger and Nixon had
many good policy options that could have reversed the Israeli nuclear
program — especially by withholding US military equipment — they chose
none of them. Instead they mandated that the US government would never
officially acknowledge Israel’s nuclear weapons, if Israel never
tested them or made their existence public. Shortly after stepping
down as US Secretary of State in 1977, Henry Kissinger graciously
received a Weizmann Institute of Science honorary degree as a
"messenger of peace" and "principal architect of international
conciliation."
In 1987 the Department of Defense contracted a study titled
"Critical Technology Issues in Israel" led by Dr. Edwin S. Townsley,
Deputy Director of the Science and Technology Division of the
Institute for Defense Analyses. According to leaks to the press, the
IDA study documented Weizmann scientists developed a cutting-edge
high-energy physics and hydrodynamics program "needed for nuclear bomb
design." Weizmann also worked on advanced methods for enriching
uranium to weapons-grade through the use of lasers. As US foreign aid
for Israeli conventional weapons purchases and development surged, so
too did Weizmann’s US charitable funding for secret weapons
development.
The American Committee for the Weizmann Institute added $50 million
in US tax-deductible charitable contributions to its half billion in
net assets according to its latest public
tax filing. In 2009 it dispatched $43 million for "program
services" in the "Middle East and North Africa" at the Weizmann
Institute. AIPAC, which features Weizmann programs at its
annual policy
events and is intertwined through chairman emeritus Robert Asher’s
ties to both organizations, would no doubt muster the full might of
its 50-plus
executive committee organizations to derail any attempt at overdue
regulation of Weizmann during the current showdown with Iran.
Nobody was ever arrested for Atomic Energy Act violations over
NUMEC due to statute of limitations and investigatory obstructions.
But Weizmann and NUMEC are not dead historical issues under the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
By knowingly turning a blind eye on Weizmann’s assistance to
Israel’s clandestine nuclear program and refusing to hold Israel and
its US collaborators responsible for NUMEC diversions, the US has
violated Article 1 of the NPT. It states, "Each nuclear-weapons state
undertakes not to transfer, to any recipient, nuclear weapons, or
other nuclear explosive devices, and not to assist any
non-nuclear-weapon state to manufacture or acquire such weapons or
devices." It is clear that the Justice Department did not follow the
Weizmann investigation through to its logical conclusion, even after
discovering the US weapons-funding front. The key conclusion of a
recently declassified General Accounting Office report is that the US
government similarly failed to properly investigate the
NUMEC
uranium diversions. Taxpayers, who must pay extra revenue to the
US Treasury because of the Weizmann Institute’s unjustifiable tax
deductible status, have long been made involuntary accomplices in
Middle East nuclear proliferation. Given these tragic US failures to
uphold rule of law, it is now time for the International Atomic Energy
Agency to take notice of the true violators of the NPT.
Read more by Grant Smith