| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 A Post 'Arab Spring' Palestine  By Ramzy Baroud Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, July 9, 2012 
 Will the Arab Spring serve the cause of Palestine?” is a 
	question that has been repeatedly asked, in various ways, over the last year 
	and a half. Many media discussions have been formulated around this very 
	inquiry, although the answer is far from a simple “yes” or “no.”
 
 Why 
	should the question be asked in the first place? Hasn’t the Arab link to the 
	Palestinian struggle been consistently strong, regardless of the prevalent 
	form of government in any single Arab country? Rhetorically, at least, the 
	Arab bond to Palestine remained incessantly strong at every significant 
	historical turn.
 
 True, disparity between rhetoric and reality are as 
	old as the Arab-Israeli conflict. But the relatively small divide between 
	words and actions widened enormously following the Arab defeat in the 1967 
	war, which cemented US-Israeli ties like never before.
 The war 
	brought an end to the dilemma of independent Palestinian action. It shifted 
	the focus to the West Bank and Gaza, and allowed the still dominant Fatah 
	party to fortify its position in light of Arab defeat and subsequent 
	division.
 
 The division was highlighted most starkly in the August 
	1967 Khartoum summit in Sudan, where Arab leaders clashed over priorities 
	and definitions. Should Israel’s territorial gains redefine the status quo? 
	Should Arabs focus on returning to a pre-1948 or pre-1967 situation?
 
 The PLO insisted that the 1967 defeat should not compromise the integrity of 
	the struggle. It also stressed that Palestine – all of Palestine – was still 
	the pressing issue. Then-Egyptian President Jamal Abdel Nasser’s messages 
	seemed, for once, befuddled, although he continued to advocate conventional 
	military confrontation with Israel. Syria, on the other hand, didn’t attend 
	the summit.
 
 International response to the war was not promising 
	either. The United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 242 on Nov. 
	22, 1967, reflecting the US’ wish to capitalize on the new status quo 
	(Israeli withdrawal “from occupied territories” in exchange for 
	normalization with Israel). The new language of the immediate post-1967 
	period alarmed Palestinians, who realized that any future political 
	settlement was likely to ignore the situation that had existed prior to the 
	war, and would only attempt to remedy current grievances. Then, the 
	boundaries of the conflict permanently changed. For some, Palestine and its 
	conflict became more of a burden than a shared responsibility. Official Arab 
	solidarity with Palestinians become a form of everyday politics – essential 
	to claim relevance to greater Arab causes, but extraneous in terms of 
	substance and application.
 
 Present-day Palestinian leaderships – 
	since there are several bodies that claim to represent Palestinians 
	“everywhere” – also learned how to stage-manage official Arab manipulation 
	of Palestine. They often did so out of desperation, as they urgently needed 
	a physical base and sources of financial support.
 
 Over time, it 
	became clear that official Arab solidarity with Palestine was mostly – 
	although not entirely – a farce. The solidarity they speak of is either 
	entirely nonexistent, or grossly misrepresented. Palestinian communities in 
	various Arab countries are treated with suspicion at best. Those who never 
	tired of publicly calling for freedom for Jerusalem failed to treat 
	Palestinian refugees with respect. They refused entry to stateless 
	Palestinians and denied Palestinians work and permanent residence. Many 
	Palestinians surely concluded that one must learn to differentiate between 
	Arab peoples and Arab governments. Since the latter mostly dominate the 
	former without legitimate mandate, it was foolish to expect official Arab 
	institutions to lead any substantive action to end the subjugation of 
	Palestinians.
 
 That is, until several Arab nations revolted. The more 
	genuine and inclusive the revolt, the more representative the outcome has 
	been. A sudden surge in popular solidarity with Palestine in Tunisia 
	replaced bashful but real attempts by the former Tunisian regime to 
	normalize relations with Israel.
 
 Per Israeli calculations, Arab 
	peoples are dismissible. They are a non-entity. But now Israel is forced to 
	revisit that old calculation. Its fears that Egypt’s new president, Muhammad 
	Mursi will shun, or at least revisit the Camp David peace treaty – signed 
	between Egypt and Israel in 1979, with the ultimate aim of sidelining Egypt 
	from a conflict that remains essentially “Arab” – are well-founded. But 
	Mursi is not the one that is truly feared, and nor is his Muslim 
	Brotherhood. The trepidation stems from the fact that a truly democratic 
	Egypt is unlikely to work in tandem with US-Israel to further pressure and 
	isolate Palestinians – or sideline Egypt from its Arab context. Israel and 
	its allies fear genuine Egyptian democracy.
 
 With the notable shifts 
	that may redefine Palestine’s position within Arab priorities, one cannot 
	ignore the fact that several Arab countries continue to normalize with 
	Israel, oblivious to any seasonable political changes in the region. They do 
	so as if there are hidden hands that wish to balance the possible losses in 
	Tunisia and Egypt, with gains elsewhere. Palestinians in Gaza, as elsewhere, 
	still speak of Arab solidarity with passion, but also with obvious 
	bitterness. They still pray for their brethren to come to the rescue. The 
	older generation speaks of the bravery and sacrifices of many Arabs who 
	fought alongside Palestinians. But the generational expectations have also 
	been altered. Palestinians simply want real solidarity. They want to see 
	Palestinian communities treated with respect and a complete end to Arab 
	normalization with Israel.
 
 - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) 
	is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of 
	PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: 
	Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press, London.)
 
   
 
 |  |  |