Listening and Learning: Arab Opinion Matters
By James Zogby
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, January 18, 2012
I listened attentively to Syrian President Bashar al Assad's most recent
speech in which he berated the Arab League's intervention to help stem the
violence currently racking his country. Claiming that he was listening to
his countrymen and speaking for them and that his regime was the
standard-bearer of "Arabism,” al Assad denounced the League as not
representing true Arab sentiment. For obvious reasons, we can't poll in
Syria right now, but as the past ten months of mass protests and the
unremitting and largely regime-sponsored violence have made clear, al Assad
may speak for some, but certainly not all Syrians.
On the other hand, we have polled about Syria across the Arab World, and
what we find is that it is al Assad who is out of touch with the reality of
Arab opinion or, as he might put it, "the beating heart of Arabism.” In
every country surveyed, including Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan, we learn that
overwhelming majorities of Arabs side with the Syrian demonstrators and say
that it is time for the al Assad government to step down.
I love polling because it erases doubt as to what people are really
thinking. What I have learned from my brother, John Zogby, is that when you
survey public opinion, everyone’s views count. I call it the "respectful
science.” You ask, they answer. Responses get organized by age, gender,
education level attained, income, region, and more. When you present the
results, it is as if you've opened a window, letting in the voices of a
society, so that you hear what they are saying about their lives, their
aspirations, and their attitudes.
I'm in the United Arab Emirates right now, teaching a short course on the
importance of public opinion at New York University's Abu Dhabi campus.
Looking at the most recent polling we have done across the Middle East and
North Africa makes clear some of the problems facing this region while
providing keys to solutions for some of the big issues, as well.
It is not only in Syria that we need to listen and learn. When we go next
door to Iraq, where we see the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki
making a power grab, exacerbating the risk of internal civil conflict, we
find strong majorities deeply worried about the future of their country,
rejecting division and favoring instead a government that can create jobs,
end corruption, and provide the stability and basic services needed for all
Iraqis to lead decent and productive lives.
While Iran's leadership is busy provocatively and aggressively playing
their nuclear card, our polling there reveals that the democracy movement
remains strong among Iranians. All across the country, the top priority
concerns, in addition to employment, are democracy, civil and personal
rights, political reform, and an end to corruption.
At the same time, polling in the Arab World also offers a cautionary
warning to the West's strategy to confront Iran's leaders. While it is true
that Iran's favorable ratings among Arabs have plummeted and are now less
than one half of what they were just five years ago, should the West or
Israel attack Iran, all bets are off. Since the only countries with
significantly lower favorable ratings than Iran in the Arab region are the
U.S. and Israel, the best way to resurrect Iran's ratings would be for the
U.S. or Israel to attack it.
While we are looking at the U.S., it too needs to listen better to Arab
opinion. America's favorable ratings among Arabs, which were at dangerously
low levels during the Bush Administration, got a boost from the change in
policy expected by the election of Barack Obama. Three years later, U.S.
favorable ratings are lower than they were in 2008, as Arabs see no change
in how America relates to the issue they still see as central to their
relationship with the West—that is, the unresolved matter of Palestinian
freedom and dignity.
Israel, too, should listen, but given that country's hard-line direction,
they have become increasingly tone deaf to Arab and world opinion. Our polls
show that the Arab public still supports the Arab League's peace initiative
for a two state solution, but a majority of Arabs in every country no longer
believe that Israel has any interest in making peace. Prime Minister
Netanyahu's behavior and U.S. acquiescence to Israel's policies are
radicalizing Arab opinion creating a more dangerous and volatile environment
with every passing day.
We have also polled in the two Arab countries where uprisings brought
down governments, creating the possibility for change. But those who have
been newly elected in Tunisia and Egypt must now pay attention to what the
voices of their countrymen are saying. In both countries the number one
concern is expanding employment. While Tunisians also want an expansion of
democracy, and "increasing women's rights" is high up on their list of
political priorities, Egyptians are more focused on the basic needs of life
and "ending corruption.” The success or failure of these "revolutions" will
be measured by their ability to meet the expectations that inspired them.
Listening to opinion is also critical for other governments in the
region. In Saudi Arabia, for example, far and away the number one concern is
the need to expand employment. With a "youth bulge" necessitating the
creation of three million new jobs over the next decade, Saudis want to know
that their children will be educated and find meaningful work in their
country. And in our surveys of business leaders in the Gulf region we find a
growing concern that opportunities be created to support private sector
economic growth, so that small businesses can become the engine driving this
needed job creation. Business leaders recognize that it is simply not a
sustainable situation for the government to be the "employer of first
resort" absorbing this growing work force. The private sector must be
involved.
As I explain in my recent book "Arab
Voices: What they Are Saying to Us and Why It Matters" and now in my NYU
course, Arab opinion matters. It clearly matters to the West which has long
ignored Arab sentiment. But the views of the public matter within the region
as well. The sooner leaders, East and West, listen and learn, the sooner
real change can occur.
***
Opinion Polls
Arab Opinion Polls
Methodology Information for Arab Voices
The methodology information for the Zogby International surveys
referenced in Arab Voices by Dr. James Zogby. Each survey was conducted
using face‐to‐face interviews with respondents in major metropolitan areas
identified through multi‐stage stratified sampling. All respondents were
adults 18 and older. All surveys were conducted in Arabic or a local
dialect. Margins of error are higher in sub‐groups.
Arab Opinion Polls: U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq, Arab Political
Concerns and Social Media (2011)
During the month of September 2011, Zogby Research Services conducted
surveys in Iraq, six other Arab countries, the United States, and Iran. AAI
released three polls (Iraq;
The War, Its Consequences & the Future; Poltical Concerns and Government;
Social Media & the Arab Spring) on December 19, 2011.
Arab Attitudes Toward Syria (2011)
Findings from this poll reveal no Arab support for the Syrian government
and U.S. role viewed as negative.
This is an Arab American Institute poll with analysis by AAI President
James Zogby. It was conducted between September 14 – October 3, 2011.
Over 4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/- 3.5% in
Morocco, Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE.
Findings from this poll reveal no Arab support for the Syrian government
and U.S. role viewed as negative.
This is an Arab American Institute poll with analysis by AAI President
James Zogby. It was conducted between September 14 – October 3, 2011. Over
4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/- 3.5% in Morocco,
Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE.
Arab Attitudes Toward Iran (2011)
Findings from part two
of the the latest Arab American Institute six Arab nations poll show real
concern with Iran’s current and future role in the region.
The poll
surveys six Arab nations’ attitudes towards Iran and other Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) issues. The key finding is that a substantial majority of
Arabs believe that Iran plays a negative role in both Iraq and the Arab Gulf
region. Conducted during the first three weeks of June by Zogby
International, over 4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/-
3.5% in Morocco, Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE.
Arab Attitudes (2011)
With the 2008 election of Barack Obama, favorable attitudes toward the
U.S. more than doubled in many Arab countries. But in the two years since
his famous “Cairo speech,” ratings for both the U.S. and the President have
spiraled downwards. The President is seen overwhelmingly as failing to meet
the expectations set during his speech, and the vast majority of those
surveyed disagree with U.S policies.
In five out of the six
countries surveyed, the U.S. was viewed less favorably than Turkey, China,
France—or Iran. Far from seeing the U.S. as a leader in the post-Arab Spring
environment, the countries surveyed viewed “U.S. interference in the Arab
world” as the greatest obstacle to peace and stability in the Middle East,
second only to the continued Palestinian occupation.
2010 Six Nation Survey
Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted
under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban
samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide.
The tables show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews
conducted in that country. For results based on the full sample in a given
country, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to
sampling and other random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In
addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording
and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias
into the findings of opinion polls.
Arab Voices Book Survey (2010)
Summary of survey data used in Arab Voices: What
They Are Saying to Us, and Why it Matters.
Arab Opinions on President Obama’s First 100 Days: A Six Nation
Survey (2009)
On Attitudes toward President Obama and the United States: Since
President Barack Obama’s election, there has been a change in Arab attitude
toward the United States. In Saudi Arabia (KSA), the UAE, Lebanon and
Morocco, over 50 percent of the public polled say their attitude toward the
United States is more positive as a result of Barack Obama being elected
President. In Jordan and Egypt, a majority remains neutral with only about
one-in-four saying their attitude has changed for the better. The UAE,
however, is the only Arab country where a majority of respondents hold a
favorable opinion of the United States overall.
6 Nation Survey of the Middle East: Arab Broadcast Forum (2008)
Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted
under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban
samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide.
The tables
show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews conducted in that
country. For results based on the full sample in a given country, one can
say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other
random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In addition to sampling
error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the
findings of opinions polls.
6 Nation Survey of the Middle East: Arab Economic Forum (2008)
Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted
under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban
samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide.
The tables
show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews conducted in that
country. For results based on the full sample in a given country, one can
say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other
random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In addition to sampling
error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the
findings of opinions polls.
Arab Views of Leadership, Identity, Institutions and Issues of
Concern (2007)
All fieldwork in this survey was
conducted between November 1, 2007 and December 25, 2007 in the following
nations (dates vary slightly by country).
Four Years Later: Arab Opinion Troubled By Consequences of Iraq War
(2007)
Four years after the start of the US-led war in
Iraq, the Arab world is deeply worried about the consequences of that
conflict. Of particular concern is the degree to which the war has
emboldened neighboring Iran and the heightened danger that Iraq, as a
country, may unravel in a civil war that could spill over into the broader
region.
These are a few of the highlights of the Zogby International
(ZI)/Arab American Institute (AAI) poll conducted between February 26 and
March 10, 2007. The poll, which surveyed 3,400 Arabs in Egypt, Saudi Arabia,
Jordan, UAE and Lebanon, had a margin of error of +/-3.5% in Egypt and Saudi
Arabia and +/- 4.1% in Jordan, the UAE and Lebanon.
James Zogby Testimony to House Committee on Foreign Affairs (2007)
House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on International
Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, and Subcommittee on Middle East
and Asia
Arab Opinion on American Policies, Values and People
For the past five years we at Zogby International have had the
opportunity to poll regularly and extensively in countries across the Arab
world. Some of our polls that have generated the greatest attention have
been those that have focused on what Arabs think about America: our people,
products, values, and our policies that affect their region. Equally
significant, however, have been our groundbreaking surveys of Arab values,
concerns, expectations, and needs.
5 Nation Survey of the Middle East (2006)
Continuing Conflict in Iraq and Palestine Deepens U.S.-Arab Rift with
Growing Costs to Both Sides
Results of the 2006 AAI/Zogby
International poll in 5 Arab countries show:
- Overall Arab attitudes toward U.S. have worsened;
negative attitudes have hardened
- Attitudes toward U.S. policies in Iraq and
Palestine are to blame
- Attitudes toward American values, people and
culture have declined as well
- Uncertainty resulting from these two conflicts has
significantly dampened Arab confidence in prospects for economic
development and political stability
Arab Business Council: 6-Nation Survey (2006)
Impact of Events on Economic Development
Impact of Events on
Political Stability
Better Off/Worse Off: vs. 4 Years Ago & vs. 4
Years From Now
Reform, Opportunity and Issues
Demographics
Arab Gulf Business Leaders Look to the Future (2006)
Significant developments are taking place in the Arab Gulf region.
Dramatic increases in oil revenues have spurred what some are calling an
“Arab Renaissance,” with record construction, investment, and growth
observed in many of the area’s countries. At the same time, some of the
region’s governments have taken new initiatives aimed at liberalizing their
economies and, in varying degrees, their political systems. All of these
positives, however, are occurring against the backdrop of worrisome
destabilizing developments, some in the broader region and others in the
Gulf itself.
Poll Shows Bases for Unity in Lebanon (2005)
Despite deep differences, which continue to divide the so-called
“opposition” and “loyalist” movements in Lebanon, there are some important
areas of agreement that could form the basis for national unity and
democratic reform in that country. This is one of the initial findings of a
new Zogby International/Information International poll taken in Lebanon
during the second week of April 2005.
Rafic Hariri Assassination (2005)
The continuing signs
of ferment in evidence in the streets of Beirut are being heralded in the US
as signs that “another Middle East domino is falling.” The Bush
Administration has been quick to latch on to the demonstrations as a
validation of the President’s democracy campaign.
But as horrific as
the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was and as inspiring
as the mass mobilization of the “cedar revolution” has been, the
demonstrations don’t tell the whole story of what is happening in Lebanon
today. A recent poll of 1,250 Lebanese, representing all religious groupings
in the country, establishes that while an emerging consensus exists on some
questions, on several key issues a deep sectarian divide still plagues the
country. And these issues must be tended to if Lebanon’s unity and internal
security are to be insured. The poll was conducted during the last week in
February 2005 by a Lebanese polling firm, Information International, in
conjunction with Zogby International.
Attitudes of Arabs (2005)
An In-Depth Look at Social and
Political Concerns of Arabs
Arabs are looking more inward today,
focusing on issues close to home and self-identifying more with their
countries. And despite concerns with employment, most Arabs are quite
optimistic about their future. These are some of the results of a new Zogby
International poll conducted in the last half of October 2005. Commissioned
by Young Arab Leaders, a Dubai based group, but supported, as well, by the
Arab American Institute, the poll surveyed 3,900 Arabs from Morocco, Egypt,
Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and Jordan.
Arabs Want Reform, U.S. Help in Solving Israel-Palestine Crisis
(2004)
A new survey commissioned by the Arab American
Institute of Arab public opinion asked respondents to evaluate the
importance of ten different reform issues and then to indicate how helpful
they felt the U.S. could be in assisting their countries achieve each of
those reforms. The poll surveyed attitudes of 2,600 adult Arabs in Morocco,
Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, and the United Arab Emirates and was
conducted by Zogby International.
Respondents listed the following
issues as most important in rank order: expanding employment, settlement of
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, improving healthcare, and increasing
access to education. Internal reform including curbing extremism and
expanding civil rights were of moderate importance while democratic reform,
women's rights, and increasing political debate were at the bottom of the
list.
Impressions of America (2004)
In June 2004, Zogby International surveyed almost 3,300 Arabs living in
Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.
The poll was commissioned by the Arab American Institute as a follow-up to
the 2002 “Impressions of America” study. Questions in this second
“Impressions of America” poll focused on how Arabs view America and how
Arabs learn about America.
The First Poll of Iraqi Public Opinion (2003)
Zogby International conducted interviews of 600 adults chosen at random with
consideration of ethnic backgrounds, gender, religion and social class,
throughout locations in Iraq. Interviews were conducted August 3-19, 2003 in
Basra, Karkouk, Mousel and Al Ramadi. The ethnic groups (Arabs, Kurds,
Turkaman, and Assyrians) were interviewed, in addition to the religious
groups (Shiaa, Sunni and Christians). Interviewers traveled to public places
(shopping areas and coffee shops) chosen from different social
neighborhoods. The survey's margin of sampling error is +/- 4.1%.
Ten Nation Impressions of America (2002)
In the
aftermath of the September 11 attacks, Americans became painfully aware of
the gap in understanding between our world and much of the Arab world. Front
page headlines and newsmagazine cover stories asked “why do they hate us?’
Pundits and scholars across the ideological spectrum offered answers that
ranged from the serious to the silly. Some suggested that the behavior of
the attackers was not aberrant, but characteristic of Islam and its
followers. They suggested that the West and Islam are not only different,
but are inevitably headed toward a clash. Others suggested that “they” hate
our democratic values, our superpower status, our wealth, and our people.
Still others noted that it was our policy of unquestioning support for
Israel, our denial of Palestinian rights, and our collaboration with
authoritarian regimes in the Middle East that was behind “their” alienation
from “us”.
Arabs: What They Believe and What They Value Most (2002)
The idea for this study came during a conversation with a prominent Arab
thinker. We were discussing the profound gap in understanding between the
U.S. and the Arab world that had become so painfully apparent following
Sept. 11, 2001. We noted how, in an effort to bridge this gap, the U.S. had
launched a public diplomacy campaign to help the Arab world better
understand the American reality and the American people.
Related Material:
Arab Broadcasters Raise the Bar - May 07, 2007
Gulf Business
Leaders: Optimistic but Concerned
- March 6, 2006
What Arabs Think
About Other Countries in the World - December 9, 2002
What Do Arabs Think About? - November 4, 2002
Measuring Arab
Public Opinion - July 30, 2001
Israeli Attitudes
Towards Sharon, Israel, Arabs and Peace - May 21, 2001
Israeli Voters and
Peace - February 5, 2001
U.S.-Lebanon
Relationship: The Rebuilding That Must Be Done - September 6, 1999
Arab States Gain in
U.S. Public Opinion - February 22, 1999
back to top
Arab American Opinion
Polls
Arab American Voters in 2010: Their Identity and Political Concerns
The Arab American Institute commissioned Zogby International to conduct a
telephone poll of 404 Arab Americans nationwide. Samples were randomly drawn
over national cds using Zogby International's list of Arab surnames. Zogby
International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection
probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and
exchanges. Up to six calls are made to reach a sampled phone number.
Cooperation rates are calculated using one of AAPOR’s approved methodologies
and are comparable to other professional public opinion surveys conducted
using similar sampling strategies.2 Weighting by country of origin,
religion, born in US, age, party, gender is used to adjust for non-response.
The margin of error is +/- 5.0 percentage points. Margins of error are
higher in sub-groups.
The Doha Debates: Should the U.S. Get Tough with Israel (2009)
On Monday, May 18, 2009 commentators John Zogby,
President and CEO of Zogby International, and James Zogby,
President of the Arab American Institute, joined respondent Amjad
Atallah and moderator Farah Stockman to discuss
the results of a recent poll that reveals a deep partisan divide over the
path towards Middle East peace.
The 2008 Election: How Arab Americans Will Vote and Why
Zogby International conducted an omnibus telephone poll of Arab Americans
nationwide between September 8th and September 13th, 2008.
The 2008 Election: The Arab American Vote
Zogby
International conducted an omnibus telephone poll of likely Arab American
voters between October 10 and october 15, 2008.
The target sample is
504 interviews with approximately 41 questions asked. Samples are randomly
drawn over national congressional districts using Zogby International's list
of Arab surnames in conjunction with a purchased surname list. Zogby
International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection
probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and
exchanges.
Defining the Arab American Vote (2007)
A plurality of
Arab Americans identify as Democrats (39%) while over a quarter identify as
Republicans (26%), and 28% say they are independent. The Democratic Party
receives a plurality of support across all demographic subgroups, especially
young, Catholic, and Orthodox voters.
Seeing Eye to Eye: A Survey of Jewish American and Arab American
Public Opinion (2007)
In 2002, Americans for Peace Now (APN) and the Arab American Institute
(AAI) commissioned Zogby International (ZI) to conduct the first ever
side-by-side poll of Jewish and Arab American public opinion to gauge
support within both communities for Arab-Israeli peace. With the region's
political landscape significantly altered since the first poll was
conducted—including the US war in Iraq, Israel's disengagement fromGaza,
Hamas' victory in Palestinian legislative elections, and the 2006
Israel-Lebanon war—APN and AAI commissioned ZI in May 2007 to reexamine
Jewish and Arab American public opinion.
The Arab American Vote in 2004
Poll of Arab
American Voters in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida
Zogby
International interviewed 500 Arab American registered voters, who had
indicated a likelihood of voting on November 2. The poll has a margin of
error of +/_ 4.5%. The voters came from four states (MI, OH, PA, FL),
reflecting the overall demographic profile of the national Arab American
community.
AAI/APN Survey of Jewish American and Arab American Public Opinion
(2003)
This survey was conducted by Zogby International. The Jewish American
segment was completed on 7/6/03 and totaled 503 individuals. The Arab
American segment was completed on 7/9/03 and totaled 500 individuals. In
both samples, the margin of error was +/- 4.5%.
Profiling and Pride: Arab American Attitudes and Behavior Since
September 11 (2002)
In May 2002, the Arab American Institute Foundation (AAIF) commissioned a
survey of Arab American attitudes and behavior since September 11. The May
survey is compared to a similar poll commissioned by AAIF in October
2001, in the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks. On some variables a
three-way comparison is made, including findings of a survey of Arab
American attitudes taken in 2000.
Arab American Attitudes & the September 11 Attacks (2001)
Arab Americans are proud and committed Americans, who give strong support
to President Bush's efforts to combat the terrorists who struck the United
States. At the same time, Arab Americans are very concerned about the
backlash that occurred after the September 11 terrorist attacks.The
community, however, has remained committed to its beliefs and heritage.
These are some of the results of a Zogby International (ZI) poll of Arab
American attitudes commissioned by the Arab American Institute (AAI).The
ZI/AAI poll surveyed 508 randomly selected Arab Americans from October 8-10
and had a margin of error of +4.5%.The poll results can be grouped under
three main headings.
What Ethnic Americans Really Think (2001)
We
begin with a simple observation—America is a complex society. We are a
nation of many diverse groups, each with different backgrounds and
experiences. We do not all see life and its many issues in the same way.
Shaped by our unique perspectives, we have a variety of beliefs and
attitudes. For some of us, our race, ethnicity or religion is a determining
factor that molds our general outlook or our views on specific issues. For
others, it may be our income, education or age. On some issues, we make
different assessments based on our gender or our marital status.
Arab Americans: Issues, Attitudes and Views (2000)
Until recently, the establishment of Arab Americans as an organized
political constituency had been, for the most part, in a formative process.
This year, however, Arab Americans have arrived as an independent-minded and
highly motivated political force with a common agenda.
The Arab American Vote: 1996-2002
Zogby
International surveyed 500 Arab American voters during the last week of
October 2002. The poll, commissioned by the Arab American Institute, has a
margin of error of +/-4.5%.
Related Material:
The U.S. and the World - January 7, 2002
New Poll Shows Damage Done - December 24, 2001
U.S.-Lebanon Relationship: The Rebuilding That Must Be Done - September
6, 1999
back to top
American Opinion Polls
American Opinions on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (2010)
More than four-in-five Americans (81%) agree the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict has a negative impact on U.S. interests, including a majority of
both Democrats (88%) and Republicans (77%), a new Arab American Institute/Zogby
Interactive survey finds. While Americans agree the conflict has a negative
impact, they are split about how to deal with the situation. Fifty percent
of Americans agree the Obama Administration should steer a middle course in
pursuing peace in the Middle East.
American Views on Arab and Muslim Americans (2010)
Zogby International was commissioned by Dr. James Zogby to conduct an
online survey of 2100 adults. A sampling of Zogby International's online
panel, which is representative of the adult population of the US, was
invited to participate. Slight weights were added to region, party, age,
race, religion, gender, education to more accurately reflect the population.
The margin of error is +/- 2.2 percentage points. Margins of error are
higher in sub-groups. The MOE calculation is for sampling error only.
Attitudes of U.S Voters Toward Saudi Arabia (2003)
Poll surveys American opinion on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, compares
data from similar surveys done in past years.
Attitudes of the American Public Toward the Recent Arab-Israeli Dispute
(2002)
Zogby International conducted interviews of 1,005 likely voters chosen at
random, nationwide. Conducted from April 2 to 4, the poll surveyed opinion
on the Arab Israel conflict. Margin of error is +/- 3.2%.
U.S. Attitudes Toward Arab Countries and the Israeli-Palestinian
Conflict (2000)
American voters are demonstrating an increasingly favorable attitude
toward Arab countries. Commissions by Abu Dhabi Television and AAI the poll
interviewed 1012 randomly selected U.S. voters from December 18 to 21, 2000.
The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.2%.
U.S Public Opinion Supports Palestinian Right to Return (2000)
American voters support the implementation of Palestinian rights in any
future Middle East peace agreement. A survey of 890 likely voters
nation-wide shows 66 percent of Americans support the Palestinians right to
independent statehood - with only 13 percent opposed.
Al-Majallah/AAI Poll (1998)
On April 3, 1998, 81 U.S. Senators (out of 100) sent a letter to U.S.
President Bill Clinton insisting that he not use public pressure against
Israel in an effort to break the impasse in the Middle East peace process.
A recent poll of U.S. voters, however, demonstrates that this one-sided
view held by the U.S. Congress is totally out of touch with U.S. public
opinion on Middle East issues.
The poll, commissioned by Al Majallah Magazine and the Arab American
Institute (AAI) of Washington, D.C., was conducted by the New York firm of
Zogby International. From April 19 to April 22 1998 the Al Majallah/AAI poll
interviewed 969 randomly selected U.S. voters. The poll’s findings have a
margin of error of +- 3.3 percent.
Nationwide Poll of U.S. Voters on Attitudes Toward Crisis in The
Middle East Peace Process (1997)
U.S. Public Opinion is overwhelmingly decided that Israel Should "stop
building the new settlement (at Jabal Abu Ghnaim) and restart peace talks
with the Palestinians. This poll was conducted for As Sharq Al Awsat and AAI
by Zogby International.
Dole’s Jerusalem Effort Receives Little Public Support
(1995)
The AAI Poll conducted by the John Zogby Group of New York was the first
such survey of U.S. public opinion attitudes towards the status of
Jerusalem. The poll surveyed 900 registered voters from July 17 to 20, 1995
and had a margin of error of +/- 3.3%
Related Material:
Arab and U.S. Public Opinion Show Similar Concerns on Iraq War - April
09, 2007
|