Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      Two-States Solution:  
	A Few Comments on Recent Norman Finkelstein 
	Interview with Frank Barat  
	By Gilad Atzmon 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, February 20, 2012 
	 
	Norman Finkelstein has recently bought himself a few 
	enemies within the Palestinian solidarity movement for openly and 
	enthusiastically advocating the Two States Solution. In the last interview 
	it seems as if Finkelstein defends Israel’s right to exist. 
	From an academic point of view, Finkelstein has a point. 
	He argues that in order to win we have to operate within the parameters set 
	by international  law. However, some points should be made here. 
	It is far from being clear who sets the parameters of 
	international law. Is it really the international community? Or is it just a 
	few powerful Western countries looking into their own particular 
	expansionist interests. 
	
		- 
		It is also far from being clear whether the international law is either 
		ethically or sensible. Is it ethical to let the Jewish State celebrates 
		its exceptional symptoms at the expense of the indigenous people of the 
		land i.e. the Palestinians?  Is it sensible to maintain an, aggressive, 
		expansionist, racist, and exclusivist, nuclear Jewish State in Middle 
		East? Is it safe? Is it good for world peace.
 
	 
	  
	
		- 
		It is far from being transparently obvious to me why an American Jewish 
		academic or any other Western solidarity activist should have a say 
		about the way or manner in which Palestinian should live on their land. 
		I, for instance, have never come across a Palestinian academic preaching 
		Britain to divide its island by resurrecting the wall at the Scottish 
		border. The meaning of it is simple, there is something fundamentally 
		pretentious in the solidarity discourse and in resolution discourse in 
		particular. We, for some reason, like to tell others what is right or 
		wrong.
 
		- 
		Do we need to discuss resolution for the conflict? Israel is already a 
		one State, it has a single electric grid, one sewage system, one 
		international pre dial number. Yet Israel is dominated politically by an 
		oppressive and racially exclusive Jewish political philosophy. This has 
		to be changed and it will be changed by means of resistance with our 
		solidarity or without it.
 
		- 
		
		Yet, Finkelstein’s criticism of the solidarity 
		movement is largely valid. The recent expulsion of Palestinians and academics from 
		the UK PSC, proves that we aren’t just dealing with a ‘cult’ discourse 
		as Finkelstein suggests, far worse, we are actually dealing with a 
		rabbinical operation that exercises the most repulsive Judaic 
		excommunication tactics.
 
		- 
		
		Finkelstein is correct when he suggests that the 
		achievements of the solidarity ‘cult’ operations are pretty limited. 
		However, he may fail to realise that solidarity with the Palestinian 
		doesn’t end in the West, in NYC, London or Paris. The recent political 
		triumph of Muslim parties in the region is fuelled by Hamas and 
		Hezbollah victories. It is more than 
		likely, that the Palestinians and the Aabs will liberate themselves.
 
		- 
		
		Unlike Finkelstein, I believe that the solidarity 
		movement is already a mass movement. More and more people out there 
		grasp that the continuum between Israel, AIPAC and the Conservative 
		Friends of Israel (CFI) is the biggest threat to world peace. More and 
		more Brits are astonished to find out that all the British political 
		parties are controlled by the Israel Lobby (Friends of Israel), CFI, 
		LFI, & LDFI . How many British politicians are as  friendly with 
		Hartlepool or Penzance?   More and more Brits and Americans grasp that 
		their politicians are for sale. They realise that on the Israeli 
		shopping list, a Western politician comes out much cheaper than a tank. 
		More and more Brits and Americans come to realise that in this crucial 
		battle for elementary freedom  ‘We 
		are all Palestinians.’
 
	 
	
	
	
	http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/a-few-comments-on-recent-norman-finkelstein-interview-with-f.html 
	  
	  
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |