Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      The United States Congress:  
	The Best That Money Can Buy  
	By Jack Barry 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 26, 2011 
	   Why make money the old-fashioned way when you can make 
	substantially more money the new way.  
	What is the new way?  
	Buy a member of Congress -- they come very cheap.   Here is the way 
	it works. Senators and congressmen once elected then desperately spend time 
	raising funds for their reelection. The vast amounts of these funds come 
	from corporate or organizational sponsors. While the U.S. Constitution 
	limits the privilege of voting to citizens, effectively corporations, 
	organizations, even foreign governments can leverage their purchase of 
	Senators and House Representatives into allowing multiple if not dominant 
	voting rights. Contributing as little as $10,000 to a member of Congress has 
	a dramatic multiplier effect. Earmarks and special consideration allow you 
	to leverage that initial investment into millions of dollars. So what type 
	of bargains can you expect by buying ten members of Congress for $10,000 
	each?   Concerned that your product has significant health impacts or 
	you wish to avoid the troublesome but ineffective federal food inspectors? 
	Easy solution, have your small band all of paid-off members of Congress 
	exclude those restrictions from bothering your company, tens of millions of 
	dollar cost avoidance on less than a $100,000 investment.   Don't want 
	to pay taxes on your earnings? Easy solution, contribute to a select band of 
	members of Congress who will exclude you from paying taxes or reduce the 
	rate that you pay, tens of million dollars in less taxes for less than a 
	$100,000 investment.   Not happy with aspects of the Dodd- Frank bill 
	that will require banks to lower the fees that they charge on ATM and credit 
	card utilization? Easy solution, contribute to as little as ten members of 
	Congress and they will introduce bills to delay or dilute the negative 
	aspects of the bill, a multi-million dollar return on less than $100,000 
	investment. This is a spec ial bargain for the banking industry was able to 
	achieve this with only buying off nine members of Congress.   This 
	bargain is not even restricted to US citizen.  Buying a member of 
	congress is a global fair-traded item.  Foreign nations and their 
	agents have successfully bought members of congress; reaping significant 
	economic, military, and political advantages.  This is the best bargain 
	in town.    The United States used to be a representative government. 
	Since the early 50s there's been a steady transition as the price of 
	reelection has risen to the tens of millions of dollars, the only practical 
	solution has been for members of Congress to prostitute themselves to 
	special interest sponsors. We have become a patronarchy!   Is there a 
	solution if you don't have $10,000 for a member of Congress? Not an easy 
	solution, it would require three things that have been consistently 
	roadblock by bipartisan virtual coalitions of members of Congress:   
	1.     The first and foremost is term limits for members 
	of Congress -- two terms for Senators and three terms for members of House 
	of Representatives   2.     The second bans all 
	corporate and organizational political contributions - hard money and soft 
	money, direct and indirect, cash and other services included -- no 
	exceptions; and,   3.     Pay members of Congress 
	a compensation that is commiserate with their influence and status to 
	prevent them from selling themselves so cheaply.   In the ten years 
	prior to the financial crisis, the financial industry in the US paid almost 
	$3 billion in contributions to members of Congress. Was this done out of 
	corporate citizenship or as a quid pro quad expectation of favorable 
	treatment by Congress?  Recently the Supreme Court ruled corporations 
	can make fund political campaign.  Does this not negate one man one 
	vote replacing it with one-artificial person gets many votes?  The 
	ability to influence and pressure thousands outweighs individual votes. This 
	is not the basis of democracy; it is the basis of patronarchy and the 
	continued selling of political power.   Change is desperately needed. 
	When will did happen?  
	When pigs can fly and the general public is more interested in Congress 
	and less interested in Charlie Sheens’ ranting and Lindsay Logan’s antics!  
	In other words, never.  
  
       
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |