Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
	 
  
	Two Different Worlds of Describing September 11 
	Attacks  
	By Paul Balles 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 19, 2011 
	   This past week the internet and mainstream media have both been 
	chock-a-block with 9/11. But they haven't been in the same world. The 
	contrasting stories have been absolutely amazing.   The mainstream 
	media has covered the ceremonies honouring the dead and the courageous.  
	Both deserve the honours--the dead as innocent victims and the courageous 
	for sacrificing their lives and health in rescue efforts.   TV and 
	print media have both gone into expansive detail about the victims and the 
	heroism of first responders--police, fire fighters and paramedics.   
	The stories cover moving, appropriate memorials to the dead and injured.  
	  But then there's the other world, which exists outside of the 
	mainstream--the 9/11 truth seekers.   Truth seekers range from extreme 
	conspiracy theorists, who believe that the Bush administration engineered 
	the attacks to consolidate power, roll back civil liberties and help oil 
	mogul friends.    More moderate factions simply insist that top 
	government officials know more about the attacks than they have 
	acknowledged, and then used the attacks as a pretext for invading Iraq.  
	  A large percentage of activists proffer--often in great detail--what 
	they call inconsistencies in government explanations of the attacks, which 
	many consider a governmental cover-up.   The most amazing thing about 
	these two worlds is that one of them doesn't even acknowledge that the other 
	even exists.   Major newspapers like the New York Times, Washington 
	Post, Wall Street Journal and major networks like MSNBC, ABC, CBS and CNN 
	have knowledgeable reporters, researchers and anchors working for them.   
	They can't possibly be so completely detached from the internet world and 
	unaware of the truth seekers.  They act as if they don't know the questions 
	that have been raised or the findings that have been reported in the online 
	world.   Mainstream media voices continue to talk about 9/11 as if 
	thousands of intelligent researchers didn't even exist!   These people 
	might as well have duct tape over their mouths! What silenced the media 
	people who use remarkable resources to dig up facts, evaluate them and make 
	sound judgments about other issues?   It's impossible to believe that 
	mainstream commentators and their staffs have willingly buried their heads 
	in the sand obliterating any honest investigation of the questions raised 
	about 9/11.   How can they pretend to be honest anchors and programme 
	hosts and not stay awake at night with guilt over what they have shoved 
	under the carpet?   David Ray Griffin, Professor Emeritus, author of 
	11 books on 9/11 wrote, "All the proffered evidence that America was 
	attacked by Muslims on 9/11, when subjected to critical scrutiny, appears to 
	have been fabricated."  Have our brilliant news anchors been oblivious 
	to this?   Apparently the wealthy networks and publications haven’t 
	used their vast resources to investigate the findings of more than 3000 
	professionals and experts who have questioned the official story.    
	The findings that follow come from
	The Wisdom Fund. 
	   More than 220 Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and 
	Government Officials, including two generals, have questioned the 9/11 
	Commission's report.   Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, Former Director of 
	Advanced Space Programs Development said "Scholars and professionals . . . 
	have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 
	9/11 is false and that the official 'investigations' have really been 
	cover-up operations."    The following have all found serious flaws in 
	the Commission's findings.    1500 plus architects and engineers; more 
	than 250 pilots and aviation professionals; 400 plus professors, dedicated 
	to research and teaching the truth; more than 300 survivors and family 
	members; 200 plus artists, entertainers and media professionals.   A 
	video released last week entitled
	
	AE 9/11Truth  Experts Speak Out provides the clearest analysis of the 
	9/11 attacks from professional architects and engineers. It is, without 
	doubt, the best and most comprehensive film yet produced challenging the 
	official version of the WTC attacks.  It’s also the appropriate 
	antidote to the disinformation that continues to be pervasive in the US 
	media.   The world of the mainstream media need not entertain flawed 
	or questionable conspiracy theories. However, with their articulate anchors, 
	investigative reporters and large staffs of producers and researchers, they 
	have no excuse for wallowing in ignorance.   The major news 
	organizations and networks need to get in tune with the cogent minds of 
	scientists and credentialed professionals who have found legitimate flaws in 
	the public accounts of 9/11. 
	
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |