Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
       Fallacy of the 'War on Terrorism'  
	 By Mahboob A KhawajaAl-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 12, 2011 
	   “Looking back, we may see things that we do not want to revisit 
	just yet, controversies that we wish to leave behind. For us to learn as a 
	nation, however, for us to hand down to future generations what they need to 
	know, we must be clear about what happened. We were attacked by a handful of 
	people from a relatively small organization of fanatics who had tapped into 
	the frustrations of a sizable minority of those who shared their ethnicity 
	and religion. Our nation was stunned and wanted to unify in response. That 
	desire for unity kept too many voices silent when they should have been 
	contributing to a public debate about how to react. Wretched excesses were 
	proposed and barely opposed. We invaded a country, 
	Iraq, that had nothing to do with the attack on us, but had everything to do 
	with the preconceived plans of a cabal in and out of our government.” 
	  Richard A. Clark (Former US National Security Chief: “the Lessons of 
	9/11”: the Daily Beast, 9/7/2011)   ***   The “War on Terrorism” 
	and the individualistic issue - who is terrorist is not only ambiguous but 
	continues to be controversial and terribly deceptive in proposition. Its 
	mass media portrayal could be a matter of opinion, not established facts of 
	human life to determine what constitutes “terrorism’? The on going global 
	irony involved in the “war on terrorism” enlists cruel combination of 
	probabilities, often self-defeating purposes and inhuman tragedies as 
	plausible definitions and explanations - liberal democracy, freedom, human 
	rights and war for social justice. The American led “war on terrorism” 
	exposes this bewildering and cynical framework of greed and tyranny being 
	imposed on others. “Either you are with us or against us”, proclaimed former 
	President Bush, the draconian slogan shortly after the September 11 attacks 
	in the US. The alleged Al-Qaida link to 9/11 attacks and Osma bin Laden - 
	the accused mastermind and now reported dead second or third time by the US 
	intelligence networks, were not the stranger  to the US pursuit of global 
	political hegemony but part of the American global engagement history. 
	Arundhati Roy said it well (the Infinite Algebra of Mercy): Bush and Osama 
	are both extremists and unacceptable choices to the rest of the world…Osama 
	bin Laden was created by the CIA and is wanted by FBI.   Financed by 
	the corporate interest, the Western mass media is building vigorously the 
	public psyche and perception to see the Muslims as the culprits waging war 
	against the Christian West. The alleged myth that Islamic faith and Muslim 
	culture are the breeding ground of terrorism remains a racially manufactured 
	assumption and highly questionable theory in the real world affairs.  
	The Project for the New American Century – PNAC, was formed in 1997 (long 
	before the 9/11 crisis), with the participatory blessings of the American 
	oil and gas cartel, better known as neo-conservatives including Dick Cheney, 
	Donald Rumsfeld, Wolfwitz and many other leading agents of influence – 
	official functionaries at the time in Strategic Policy Planning and the 
	Defense portfolios within the American political echelon. All were committed 
	to dominate the global economy and the political powerhouse for America to 
	become unrivaled superpower in the New World Order. 9/11 provided that 
	much-needed conflict making opportunity to the PNAC visionary goals, 
	strategic priorities and George Bush’s continued 2nd term legal Presidency. 
	While the US government is marking the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, 
	its reasoning and lessons to be drawn have been ignored. Why did the US 
	embarked on bogus “War on Terrorism” against Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan? 
	None of these nations had anything to do with the events of the 9/11. 
	Consequently, over three millions Iraqis have been killed by the US and 
	British forces and their cultural and economic lifelines uprooted. Millions 
	more are reported to have been displaced and their habitats destroyed and 
	lands poisoned and polluted by dangerous weapons across Iraq and 
	Afghanistan. Who would celebrate the 10th anniversary of those cold blooded 
	massacres and painful anguish inflicted by the US-British aggression?    
	At the 10th anniversary of the 9/11, Robert Jensen, Professor University of 
	Texas (“Imperial Delusions: Ignoring the Lessons of 9/11” Common Dreams: 
	9/9/2011) offered this soul searching concern:   “Today the United 
	States is morally bankrupt and spiritually broken. The problem is not that 
	we have strayed from our founding principles, but that we are still 
	operating on those principles -- delusional notions about manifest destiny, 
	American exceptionalism, the right to take more than our share of the 
	world’s resources by whatever means necessary. As the United States grew in 
	wealth and power, bounty for the chosen came at the cost of misery for the 
	many……The George W. Bush administration offered a particularly intense 
	ideological fanaticism…….We should take time on 9/11 to remember the nearly 
	3,000 victims who died that day, but as responsible citizens, we also should 
	face a harsh reality: While the terrorism of fanatical individuals and 
	groups is a serious threat, much greater damage has been done by our 
	nation-state caught up in its own fanatical notions of imperial greatness.” 
	  In 1984, the Union Carbide gassed more than 16, 000 people in Bhopal, 
	India and millions more were affected to suffer for generations to come, but 
	India did not invoke any military action against the American giant. In 
	1981, two to three thousands Palestinian civilians were massacred at Sabra 
	and Chatila camps in Lebanon by Israeli General Aeriel Sharon troops. 
	Lebanon or the Arabs collectively had neither armed forces nor courage to 
	fight for a humanitarian cause. In 1994, four millions or so Rwandans were 
	killed in planned ethnic violence but the world watched it from a corner, 
	and the UN did nothing to safeguard the humanity. It was not the defense of 
	the American values that President Bush went to wars in Iraq and 
	Afghanistan. John Chapman (“the real reasons Bush went to war”: 06.2004), 
	the British Senior Civil Servant cites two major factors to invade Iraq: 
	“control over oil and the preservation of the dollar as the world reserve 
	currency.”  Earlier, President Bush had included Iraq and Iran in the 
	‘axis of evil’ as both had changed the currency of oil trade from US dollar 
	to euro and others. Iraq is known to have 60% of the world known oil 
	reserves and only second to Saudi Arabia in its oil production capacity. 
	  How does the oil cartel greed for excessive profit is terrorizing the 
	humanity? The American and British oil cartels paid standard $18-20 a barrel 
	years ago and now selling the same at the gas pump at $80-90 a barrel to the 
	consumers while the Iraq war is going-on and after hurricane Katrina hit the 
	American gulf coast states. The oil companies paid 7-10 cent a liter after 
	the processing, but the consumer are forced to pay $1.30 to $1.50. a liter 
	at gas station. Would they admit being the economic extremists and market 
	exploiters? But they are resourceful to fight for their cause even if it 
	means the whole world should be put to flame.   The Arabs and Iran 
	collectively produce and supply approximately 60-70 % oil consumption of the 
	Western industrialized world - ready-made recipe for business influence and 
	friendship.  To balance the trade, they invest heavily in the Western 
	economy and buy all foods and military hardware. Thousands and thousands of 
	American and British nationals work in oil, military, education and other 
	spheres of life across the Arab and Muslim world.  Tax-free salaries 
	they draw, no body can imagine nor compare them in the Western world. 
	America and Britain dominate the trade but wanted to squeeze the Arabs to 
	become more obedient and forthcoming in oil supply and the use of the 
	dollar. The American and British politicians used the 9/11 background to 
	intimidate and force the Arab rulers to go to their knees before the 
	Masters, both Bush and Blair, with possible extension of the then Canadian 
	PM as a service manager on duty - as and when needed.   The ‘War on 
	Terror’ is a self-contradictory phenomenon that represents the grand 
	delusion of the 21st century proponent of the oil-led American corporate 
	leadership. Its sole aim is global monopoly of politics and economy by 
	dehumanizing the rest of the living humanity. Geared towards the frenzy of 
	World War Three, the American neocons leadership was increasingly 
	politically isolated, militarily belligerent and morally and financially 
	bankrupt and defeated, more so, on the day photos of Abu Ghraib prison were 
	made known to the morally conscientious humanity.  Their unilateral 
	military engagements in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan have continued to 
	produce disastrous human consequences for the people all over the globe. 
	Millions of human beings have been killed and destroyed, their habitats 
	poisoned with the aftermath of dangerous weapons and chemicals. Richard A. 
	Clark (Former US National Security Chief- “the Lessons of 9/11”: the Daily 
	Beast, 9/7/2011)) puts the facts into proper context:   “Looking back, 
	we may see things that we do not want to revisit just yet, controversies 
	that we wish to leave behind. For us to learn as a nation, however, for us 
	to hand down to future generations what they need to know, we must be clear 
	about what happened. We were attacked by a handful of people from a 
	relatively small organization of fanatics who had tapped into the 
	frustrations of a sizable minority of those who shared their ethnicity and 
	religion. Our nation was stunned and wanted to unify in response. That 
	desire for unity kept too many voices silent when they should have been 
	contributing to a public debate about how to react. Wretched excesses were 
	proposed and barely opposed. We invaded a country, Iraq that had nothing to 
	do with the attack on us, but had everything to do with the preconceived 
	plans of a cabal in and out of our government.”    It is reported that 
	during the 2009-2010, the US drone attacks have killed 12,900 people in 
	Pakistani tribal belts. The bogus war on terrorism continues unabated and 
	its unthinkable consequences for ages to come. The alliance of the few 
	US-British mindless rulers have turned the clock back to draconian age and 
	are trying their best to reshape the living mankind into animalistic 
	thinking and behaviors suitable for economic exploitation and governance. 
	The American administration seems to have ignored the lessons of political 
	and moral failure of the British Empire and colonialism. In a September 
	2005, interview with the CBC, American Congress Woman Eleanor Norton made a 
	thought provoking observation when asked about the administration role and 
	help to the people in New Orleans after the hurricane Katrina: “Americans 
	are not used to being embarrassed and ashamed at the same time.” What 
	happened in Louisiana and other gulf states after the storm, offers a 
	glimpse of the overburdened and failing mind setting of the American 
	leadership with no consideration for its people and their miserable plight. 
	They prepared America on a war footing, not for a legitimate cause but to 
	control the oil industries and maintain the dollar market value. Iraq and 
	Afghanistan were seen as a necessary requisite to deceive the American 
	public that Arabs and Muslims are the extremists and pose threats to 
	American political hegemony. Whereas, today, more than 80% of the Muslim 
	countries and rulers are maintained by the West and are under the direct 
	political and economic control of the US and British Governments. One 
	wonders, how could the subservient people and the rulers dare to challenge 
	the colonial masters? Is it not the ruling America and British colonial 
	elite actively engaged in terrorizing the Muslims all over the globe? Are 
	they fearful of the new educated generations of Muslims and their democratic 
	indoctrination that could undo their inherited lordship in the former 
	colonies? After all, Muslims were considered just as ‘subjects’ of the 
	Empire, not citizens with rights and entitlement to human ‘freedom.’ Is that 
	not a page out of the living history? Or is it news to the former colonial 
	bandmasters? Was the colonialism a  rational choice of the liberal 
	democracy?     Wars do not grow anything consumable but destroy human 
	lives and habitats. Whereas the corporate interests and markets have no 
	human social values, nor do they have moral accountability. It is 
	increasingly action-reaction game masked and staged at the global theatre of 
	absurdity starring Bush, Blair, Militarism, the mass media, former General 
	Musharaf and the new creed of complacent Pakistani Generals (earning cash 
	paper dollars) as an added attraction to ensure smooth services of 
	trilateral businesses across the globe. Exsorbent profits looted by the oil 
	companies are not going to be reimbursed to the public at gas stations.  
	Would the American neocons rebuild the lost lives and human habitats in 
	Afghanistan and Iraq and Pakistan? After carpet bombing of the Afghan 
	graveyards and major Iraqi towns, could they bring to life what was 
	deliberately destroyed under the PNAC planned “war on terrorism”? Their goal 
	was ‘regime change’ but they alleged WMD which could not be found throughout 
	the international search in Iraq. It was a lie, a false pretext acclaimed 
	tactfully to deceive the mankind. Could Bush, Blair and the neocons be held 
	responsible under the international Geneva protocols of crimes against the 
	humanity?    Human beings have faces, bodies and souls but the modern 
	warfare knows neither body nor face when it comes to killing. Hitler and 
	Mussolini were the by- products of the European nationalism but after ages, 
	the European once again failed to impart real world knowledge and experience 
	of the Two World Wars to safeguard the future generations from the scourge 
	of national wars and colonialism. The American administration appears active 
	and persistent to wage traditional and innovative new wars against the newly 
	created and targeted enemy – Islam and Muslims. They do need conflicts and 
	wars for economic and political survival and control of the global 
	resources. PNAC philosophy embedded in American unilaterism sees war as a 
	positive necessity for development and domination. Hurricane Katrina and the 
	aftermath and now continued flooding and fires in Texas and California are 
	not taken seriously as the first installments of Godly reminders to the 
	American leadership for causing deaths and destruction in Iraq and 
	Afghanistan and Pakistan. The American masses are reasonably conscientious 
	of being dragged into the Iraq-Afghan wars, the majority disapproves and 
	they protest and demonstrate against the bogus “war on terror.”. Cindy 
	Sheehan and her movement offered a peaceful role model for political 
	activism across the United States. But the controlling interest of the ‘war 
	on terror’ rests with previous ruling lord of the politics- the instigator 
	neocons and now continued under Obama administration, wherein the American 
	masses appear helpless spectator, not active participants in the making and 
	running of the liberal democracy, more of a forged democracy of the few. In 
	1990, Dick Cheney, the then Secretary to Senior Bush wrote:  “whoever 
	controls the flow of the Persian Gulf oil has a stranglehold not only on our 
	economy but also on the other countries of the world as well.” The obsession 
	of that stranglehold rested with Bush, Cheney and Blair onward to Obama– all 
	actively have supported and facilitated the crusade against Islam and 
	Muslims. It is the humanity that suffers, not the affluent leaders. There 
	are serious dangers to enflame the ethnic and religious wars across the 
	globe. Robert Fisk, the British journalist recently noted: “Before the 
	(Iraq) war, our governments warned us of threats that did not exist, now 
	they hide from us, the threats that do exist.”   The American-led wars 
	in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan have made the global system of states 
	redundant and the United Nations in particular, an impotent body – an 
	onlooker meant just for discussions and ineffective role play in peace 
	making or sustainable system of the working of the member states according 
	to its mandate. The UN has failed to stop American and British encroachment 
	in the Middle East, ethnically charged “war on terror”, the global village 
	and the ideals of the safety and security of the world. The ideals of 
	international peace and harmony have been dashed away by the few – be it 
	Bush or Blair, Musharaf or Obama, none of them could be acceptable choices 
	to the civilized humanity. They pursued self-motivated greed complementing 
	ignorance - the driving force to manipulate the world, overwhelmed with 
	action-reaction strategies of the past, dull, dead and irrelevant history. 
	For their self-centered survival, they appear devoid of the reason, human 
	spirit and intellectual foresight to face the realities of living history. 
	Most of the humanity is acutely aware of the fallacy 
	of the terrorism myth, for it is not Islam, Christianity or Judaism 
	but those few who act and react to stranglehold the 
	humanity for oil resources and monetary controls. Have the mindless 
	warmongers ever thought of how the history will portray them - the time span 
	in which they lived and acted, consequential impacts on the people, the 
	outlook of culture of the so called civilized people pursuing animalistic 
	ambitions and killings of fellow human beings? Richard Clark, former US 
	National Security Chief (“the Lessons of 9/11’) offers a rational 
	perspective: 
	“Knowing what our core values are and cleaving to them, even in times of 
	testing, must be a lesson when we see the results of situational ethics and 
	temporary, expedient treatment of basic rights. America should not again 
	panic and overreact to terrorist attacks against this country…….the cost of 
	9/11 has been billions of dollars spent, an unneeded war, and thousands of 
	lives lost.”   Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja specializes in 
	global security, peace and conflict resolution with keen interests in 
	Islamic-Western comparative cultures and civilizations, and author of 
	several publications including: "Muslims and the West: Quest for Change and 
	Conflict Resolution", University Press of America; How America Lost the War 
	in Iraq and Afghanistan and Mujahideen Won; To America and Canada with 
	Reason, VDM Publishers, 2009; “President Obama – War is War, Not Peace”, 
	2009; and “Is President Obama Remaking America?” “President Obama and the US 
	Generals in search of Navigational Change.”  Comments are welcome at:
	kmahboob@yahoo.com.  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |