Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Islamophobia Can Create Radicalization in
the US
By James Zogby
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, March 8, 2011
Let me state quite directly: Islamophobia and those who promote it
are a greater threat to the United States of America than Anwar al Awlaqi.
Islamophobia, if left unchecked, may serve to erect barriers to
Muslim inclusion in America, increasing alienation, especially among young
Muslims. Not only would such a situation do grave damage to one of the
fundamental cornerstones of America's unique democracy, it would
simultaneously rapidly expand the pool of recruits for future
radicalization.
I have often remarked that America is different, in
concept and reality, from our European allies. Third generation Kurds in
Germany, Pakistanis in the UK, or Algerians in France, for example, may
succeed and obtain citizenship, but they do not become German, British, or
French. Last year, I debated a German government official on this issue. She
kept referring to the "migrants" - a term she used to describe all those of
Turkish descent, living in her country, regardless of the number of
generations they had been there. Similarly, following their last election, a
leading British newspaper commented on the "number of immigrants" who won
seats - without noting that many of those "immigrants" were third generation
citizens.
America has prided itself on being different. Being
"American" is not the possession of a single ethnic group, nor does any
group define "America.” Not only do new immigrants become citizens,
they also secure a new identity. More than that, as new groups become
American and are transformed - the idea of "America" itself has also changed
to embrace these new cultures.
Within a generation, diverse ethnic
and religious groups from every corner or the globe have become Americans,
dramatically changing America in the process. Problems remain and intolerant
bigots, in every age, have reared up against new groups, but history
demonstrates that, in the end, the newcomers have been accepted,
incorporated and absorbed into the American mainstream.
This defines
not only our national experience, but our defining narrative, as well. When
immigrant school children in Europe learn French, German or British history
- they are learning "their host's" history. In the U.S., from the outset, we
are taught that this is "our new story" - that it includes all of us and has
included us all, from the beginning.
It is because new immigrants
and diverse ethnic and religious communities have found their place and
acceptance in the American mainstream that the country, during the last
century, survived and prospered despite being sorely tested with World Wars,
economic upheaval and bouts with internal strife. During all this time we
had to contend with anti-black, anti-Asian, anti-Catholic, anti-Jewish,
anti-immigrant, and anti-Japanese movements. In the end, after creating
their moment of pain, these efforts have always lost.
They lose, but
they do not always go away. The Islamophobia we are witnessing today is the
latest campaign by bigots to tear apart the very fabric of America. We know
the groups promoting it. First, there is the well-funded "cottage industry,”
on the right, of groups and individuals with a long history of anti-Arab or
anti-Muslim activity. Some of the individuals associated with these efforts
have been given legitimacy as commentators on "terrorism,” "radicalization"
or "national security concerns" - despite their obvious bias and even
obsession with all things Arab or Muslim (in this, they remind me of good
old-fashioned anti-Semites who never tired of warning of Jewish threats or
conspiracies or who while always claiming to like individual Jews, rallied
against any and all Jewish organizations).
If these "professional
bigots" have provided the grist, the mill itself was run by the vast network
of right-wing talk radio and TV shows and websites and prominent preachers
who have combined to amplify the anti-Muslim message nationwide. Their
efforts have done real damage. They have tormented descent public servants,
created protests that have shuttered legitimate institutions, fomented hate
crimes and produced fear in the Muslim community.
In just the past
two years, we have seen a dramatic upsurge in the activity of these bigots.
More ominously, their cause has been embraced by national political leaders
and by elements in the Republican Party - who appear to have decided, in
2010, to use "fear of Islam" as a base-building theme and a wedge issue
against Democrats for electoral advantage.
In the past only obscure
or outrageous Members of Congress (like: North Carolina's Sue Myrick who
expressed nervousness and insecurity because of "who was owning all those
7/11's"; or Colorado's Tom Tancredo who once warned that he "would bomb
Mecca") were outspoken Islamophobes. After the National Republican
Congressional Campaign Committee embraced opposition to Park 51 as a
campaign theme, it is hard to find a leading Republican who has not railed
on some issue involving Islam or Muslims in the U.S. The net
impact here is that this current wave of Islamophobia has both played to the
Republican base, while firming up that base around this agenda. The polling
numbers are striking and deeply disturbing. Fifty-four percent of Democrats
have a favorable attitude toward Muslims, while 34% do not. Among
Republicans, on the other hand, only 12% hold a favorable view of Muslims,
with 85% saying they have unfavorable views. Additionally, 74% of
Republicans believe "Islam teaches hate" and 60% believe that "Muslims tend
to be religious fanatics".
The danger here is that to the degree
that this issue has become a partisan and, in some cases, a proven vote
getter for the GOP, it will not go away any time soon. The longer we are
plagued by this bigotry, and the displays of intolerance it breeds (the
anti-mosque building demonstrations or the anti-Sharia law efforts now
spreading across the country) the longer young Muslims will feel that the
"promise of America" does not include them - and they will feel like aliens
in their own country.
It is this concern that has prompted many
inter-faith religious groups and leaders and a diverse coalition of ethnic
and civil rights organizations to so vigorously oppose Congressman Peter
King's (R-NY) hearings that will deal with the radicalization of American
Muslims later this week. They know, from previous statements made by King,
of his personal hostility to American Muslims. They also know that what King
is doing will only aggravate an already raw wound, creating greater fear and
concern among young Muslims - who have already witnessed too much bigotry
and intolerance.
What they should also know, is that in the
process of targeting a religion in this way and engaging in this most
"un-American activity" King and company are, in fact, opening the door for
increased alienation and future radicalization. Al Awlaqi must be smiling
from inside his cave.
|
|
|