Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
American Bloody Pragmatism
By
Gilad AtzmonAl-Jazeerah, CCUN, March 8, 2011
After killing hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the name of democracy,
the White House has now decided that ‘stability in the region’ is by far,
much more important.
On Saturday, The Wall Street journal
reported that the Obama administration is devising a new Middle East
strategy in the face of ongoing Arab world turmoil, preferring stability
over democracy for key allies in the region.
Here in Britain not many
people believed Bush and Blair when they preached democracy and moral
interventionism -- And I guess that the new American strategy cannot be
taken at all seriously either.
Actually, I believe that by now, the
American ruling elite should just come clean and tell the truth to the Arabs
in the region: ‘listen you guys -- all we want is your oil. We don’t care
what you do with your life, or what you believe in; just keep the flow of
this dark greasy lubricant stable.’
(All they want is oil and keeping Israel safe --
Correction by Al-Jazeerah Editor)
I wonder; why is it so difficult for the American and British governments
to produce such a simple statement? After all; is not telling the truth a
Western value?
The report contended that the new American policy is
due to domestic U.S. criticism that the Obama administration had sent mixed
messages in the initial stages of the Egyptian uprising, and that the
ambiguity and confusion had led to the ousting of President Mubarak, a
longtime Western ally : The White House had tentatively endorsed Mubarak's
leadership at the beginning of the protests -- and then switched
allegiances, throwing full support behind the protesters, who eventually
overthrew the three-decade Egyptian president.
I do not entirely
agree that Obama had behaved in a confusing or inconsistent manner -- I
think that the White House policy is, actually, very coherent and very
consistent, for it constantly bounces and swings between backing the people,
and then the tyrants. When the Americans are convinced that the success of
the revolution is immanent -- they support the people. But when they are
certain that oppression and tyranny will continue to ‘provide the goods’
(cheap oil) then they simply go ahead and support their traditional
undemocratic allies.
Surely it is about time to state the obvious :
It is not morality; it is not values, and neither is it any ethical
consideration that drives our leaders. Rather, it is sheer
pragmatism, and relentless greed.
|
|
|