Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     American Bloody Pragmatism 
  By 
	Gilad AtzmonAl-Jazeerah, CCUN, March 8, 2011 
	  
	After killing hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the name of democracy, 
	the White House has now decided that ‘stability in the region’ is by far, 
	much  more important.
  On Saturday, The Wall Street journal 
	reported that the Obama administration is devising a new Middle East 
	strategy in the face of ongoing Arab world turmoil, preferring stability 
	over democracy for key allies in the region.
  Here in Britain not many 
	people believed Bush and Blair when they preached democracy and moral 
	interventionism -- And I guess that the new American strategy cannot be 
	taken at all seriously either.
  Actually, I believe that by now, the 
	American ruling elite should just come clean and tell the truth to the Arabs 
	in the region: ‘listen you guys -- all we want is your oil. We don’t care 
	what you do with your life, or what you believe in; just keep the flow of 
	this dark greasy lubricant stable.’ 
	(All they want is oil and keeping Israel safe -- 
	Correction by Al-Jazeerah Editor) 
	I wonder; why is it so difficult for the American and British governments 
	to produce such a simple statement? After all; is not telling the truth a 
	Western value?
  The report contended that the new American policy is 
	due to domestic U.S. criticism that the Obama administration had sent mixed 
	messages in the initial stages of the Egyptian uprising, and that the 
	ambiguity and confusion had led to the ousting of President Mubarak, a 
	longtime Western ally : The White House had tentatively endorsed Mubarak's 
	leadership at the beginning of the protests -- and then switched 
	allegiances, throwing full support behind the protesters, who eventually 
	overthrew the three-decade Egyptian president.
  I do not entirely 
	agree that Obama had behaved in a confusing or inconsistent manner -- I 
	think that the White House policy is, actually, very coherent and very 
	consistent, for it constantly bounces and swings between backing the people, 
	and then the tyrants. When the Americans are convinced that the success of 
	the revolution is immanent -- they support the people. But when they are 
	certain that oppression and tyranny will continue to ‘provide the goods’ 
	(cheap oil) then they simply go ahead and support their traditional 
	undemocratic allies.
  Surely it is about time to state the obvious : 
	It is not morality; it is not values, and neither is it any ethical 
	consideration that drives our leaders.   Rather, it is sheer 
	pragmatism, and relentless greed.
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |