Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
	The Case Against Those Demanding Shalit's Release
	 
	By Khalid Amayreh  
	PIC, Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, June 27, 2011 
	
  It would be dishonest not to acknowledge the strenuous efforts 
	that Israeli and pro-Israeli  circles have made on behalf of  
	imprisoned  soldier Gilad Shalit.    Outstanding among these 
	efforts has been the ongoing Shalit family campaign to set their son free. 
	The Shalits have left no stone unturned in a desperate effort to get the 
	Israeli government to release their son by hook  or by crook.  
	Their  perseverance and  enduring vigor are really admirable in 
	more than one  sense.   However, it is also true that all these 
	efforts have not achieved the desired goal, thanks  to the resilience, 
	patience and determination of  the Hamas movement.   In recent 
	days and weeks, a number of international figures made appeals on Shalit's 
	behalf.      For example,  French President Nicolas  
	Sarkozy issued an impassioned appeal,  calling on Hamas  to 
	release Shalit who holds dual Israeli and French citizenship.   "It is 
	time that those responsible for your detention make a decision and end your 
	intolerable and outrageous imprisonment," Sarkozy wrote   Sarkozy 
	called Shalit's detainment a violation of international law.   "I 
	cannot accept that you are forbidden from simple communication with your 
	relatives and from receiving messages from them in return, as if a simple 
	exchange of messages would be a sign of weakness on the part of those who 
	hold you," Sarkozy wrote.   "I urge those who are imprisoning you to 
	immediately permit the Red Cross to meet you and more than that to return 
	you to freedom."   Sarkozy's remarks  would have deserved some 
	respect had the French president burdened himself with uttering  a word  
	or  two about the fate of more than 6000 Palestinian resistance and 
	political prisoners languishing in  Israeli dungeons, bastilles and 
	concentration camps.   The fact that he ignored them utterly 
	completely suggests that Sarkozy is dishonest, hypocritical, or that he 
	thinks that those people, who include democratically elected  
	lawmakers, university professors and medical doctors, are either sub-humans 
	or children of a lesser God.   Hence, Sarkozy's  total embrace of 
	the Israeli side makes us Palestinians, as well as many honest men and  
	women around the world, treat his remarks  with the contempt they 
	deserve.   Besides, Shalit  was not abducted as the Israeli lie 
	machine keeps repeating. Shalit  was actually  taken  
	prisoner  in the middle  of a battle. He is a prisoner of war. 
	Calling him any other name is  a cheap lie and  a cheap 
	propaganda.   More to the point, Israel  keeps calling 
	Palestinian freedom fighters imprisoned in  Israel "terrorists and 
	murderers."    However, the truth of the matter is that these people 
	are freedom fighters and  political activists who rose up to fight a 
	Nazi-like  occupation that stole their country, destroyed their homes 
	and villages, and expelled their people to the four corners of the world. 
	  This means that Israel is totally disqualified to lecture the 
	Palestinians on how they should resist their tormentors and occupiers of 
	their land.   The French, perhaps 10% of the French people, were 
	involved in the resistance against the Nazis. They too  were called 
	terrorists and saboteurs by the Nazi occupation authorities. However, in 
	retrospect, most people in the world, especially in France, salute the 
	memories of those  who would have scarified their lives for the freedom 
	of their country.   Similarly,  those Palestinians who have 
	chosen  to fight the Israeli occupiers should be  compared  
	to the  10 % of  French citizens who overcame their fears and 
	decided to fight the Nazis, often  risking torture and violent death. 
	  True, some of the  Palestinian detainees languishing  for 
	decades in Israeli jails may have been involved in  killing some  
	Israelis.  However, this fact must be viewed in the context of the 
	overall conflict in which the occupying  power  murdered thousands 
	of  innocent  Palestinians. In the final analysis, those Israelis  
	killed were not killed because they were Jews, they were killed because they 
	were invaders, occupiers and  child-killers.   Indeed, it  
	is hard to find an adult Israeli who has no  blood  on his hands. 
	Zionism, after all, has transformed the Israeli Jewish  society into a 
	community of land thieves, child-killers and habitual liars.   In 
	fact, Shalit, too,  may have been involved in killing  Palestinian 
	children in Gaza or the West Bank . So, we are not talking exactly about a 
	little angel as the Israeli hasbara would caricature the imprisoned  
	soldier.   Moreover, there is no doubt  that  under normal 
	circumstances Shalit has the right to be visited by representatives of the  
	Red Cross.    However, there is also no doubt that Israel is likely to 
	take advantage of any Red Cross visit to Shalit to  locate his 
	whereabouts in order to launch a "rescue operation" in which Shalit himself 
	and many other  Palestinians would likely  be killed.   The 
	Palestinians have learned the hard way that Israel is the ultimate venomous 
	snake that can't  be trusted. This, and this alone, explains  
	Hamas' reluctance to allow the Red Cross to visit Shalit.   Finally, 
	it is imperative to  clarify some of the flagrant and  callous 
	Israeli practices against Palestinians which are bound to generate tough  
	stances on the Palestinian side.   Israel has increasingly resorted to  
	dumping thousands of innocent Palestinians activists, including 
	intellectuals, behind bars. In 99% of the cases, the only guilt these   
	people are accused of committing  is making  a public  
	statement or giving a public lecture lambasting the enduring occupation of 
	their country.   Israel calls this illegal and immoral open-ended 
	incarceration "administrative detention." The detainees themselves are not 
	informed of the reasons for their detainment  which may linger for 
	years.   Moreover, there are hundreds of Palestinians who are kept in 
	jail six month per  year, just because their names appear on the  
	Israeli  occupation's computer screen.   In short, the wanton  
	abuse meted out by Israel to Palestinians leaves them with very few choices, 
	especially in the absence of a credible Israeli  justice system that 
	would  address  real grievances and  guarantee even a 
	semblance of justice. (end)   
	
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |