Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
	The Debt Crisis:  
	 Caused by Wars, Corruption, Deficits, and Mismanagement  
	 By Yamin Zakaria 
	 Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, July 19, 2011
 
  
	The Debt Crisis: Causes and Cure   In the 1980s we 
	had the epidemic of AIDS; today its debt. There were lots of speculations or 
	conspiracy theories regarding the origins of the AIDS virus being man-made, 
	but for sure, there are no doubts regarding the current debt being 
	synthetic. It is not just the UK, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece 
	- the disease of debt has gripped most of the Western world including the 
	US, which is also the largest economy in the world.     With the 
	exception of the US, one may ask, how can a nation fall into debt, when it 
	is not involved in any major wars or experienced natural calamity? It can be 
	put down to one thing, living beyond ones means; the government budget is no 
	different to a household budget, when expenditure exceeds revenue, debt 
	arises, it is as logical as one plus one equals two. The immediate remedy 
	seems to be – borrow and reduce government expenditure which results in the 
	poorer section of society suffering most.    Before the cure, one 
	should at least examine the causes of the debt. The government books should 
	be audited by the public, detailing out the expenditure and revenue, so that 
	one can determine how the debt has arisen. This should be an inherent 
	process, given that Western nations brag about their democratic credentials 
	that state governments are accountable to the masses.     One of 
	the reasons given for the decline in tax revenue is the aging population. 
	They are economically unproductive and place a burden on government 
	expenditure; the more productive younger generation is becoming scarce as 
	people are having less children. This can be attributed to fanatical liberal 
	values replacing traditional family values; women are encouraged to pursue a 
	career before motherhood, and men are encouraged to lead a bachelor’s life 
	of fun or become homosexuals. Marriage and children are viewed as economic 
	liability that constrains the ‘freedom’ of the younger partying generation. 
	A booming economy needs a plentiful labour force that generates wealth and 
	creates the demand for goods and services. Indeed, countries with a steady 
	growing population like India, China, and Brazil are emerging economic 
	powers. Chinese capital is now flooding into Europe; there is talk of China 
	bailing out Greece. It sounds like the East India Company has finally 
	arrived from the East!    Another major factor hitting the government 
	purse is waging wars in distant lands and keeping military bases around the 
	world; such activities are economically unproductive and expensive, 
	especially for countries like the US. Agreed, some of the expenditure of 
	keeping those bases is covered by some of the docile Arab regimes and their 
	like, but still that is not enough to balance the books. As for the wars, 
	there might have been some financial gain in oil-rich Iraq, but for sure 
	barren and oil-less Afghanistan was a loss in terms of the war booty. Hence, 
	the US is cutting back, it is withdrawing gradually from Iraq and 
	Afghanistan, and has taken a backseat over Libya. The expensive space 
	project that is rooted in the cold war conflict, which has cost billions, 
	has been brought to an end.  If the masses are suffering at home, why 
	seek aliens?    Apart from an aging population and war, you can add 
	government mismanagement, which the political parties love to debate over 
	and over. However, there is a greater cause for debt: that is the system of 
	credit creation through printing money that is not backed by gold or silver; 
	fiat money functions on the basis of mass conviction, as it has no intrinsic 
	value.    Going back to basics, debt should match actual wealth in 
	society, this is the natural equilibrium. How can anyone lend me money if 
	they do not possess it in the first place? If one party can create wealth 
	simply by printing money or lending actual money backed by gold and silver 
	that it does not own, then one is also creating debt out of thin air, this 
	is an unnatural process and to be frank dishonest. If I had three friends 
	who asked me to keep £1000 pounds of gold for safekeeping for a year, would 
	it be right for me to lend that money to another party with interest without 
	their consent, thereby making myself richer by £3000 without doing any work? 
	This is what the Banks do, its theft legalised. If the society collectively 
	is creating wealth out of nothing, then it is also creating debt out of 
	nothing as that money is lent.    The injustice here is: due to the 
	money lent by the banks which are not theirs in the first place, the debtor 
	has to generate real wealth by employing real effort to repay that loan. The 
	Greeks for example will borrow paper money and then have to graft hard to 
	repay that loan with interest. Of course, they too can print money, but then 
	the money will depreciate in value enhancing the debt problem. Even if the 
	Greeks were loaned that money with zero interest rates, it is still 
	inequitable and a source of instability, because the banks as creditors are 
	not the owner. If the money was lent in the form of real assets, in gold or 
	silver by the real owners, that would limit the scale of loan and the debt; 
	the system would be in equilibrium.      Therefore, when 
	governments know money can be printed by the banks, as if they have 
	Aladdin’s lamp with a genie, the appetite for borrowing increases. In 
	contrast, if the money was intrinsically linked to tangible wealth like gold 
	and silver, it would limit the capacity for borrowing and in turn it would 
	limit the growth of debt; gold and silver cannot be printed unlike money. 
	Hence, debt would not arise, unless there are exceptional circumstances like 
	war or natural calamity. This can be corroborated from history, the Ottoman 
	Empire as an example had its currency on the basis of gold and silver, and 
	it never went into debt until the very late stages suffering from war, 
	corruption and decay.      Yamin Zakaria  
	(yamin@radicalviews.org) 
	London, UK   
	 http://yaminzakaria.blogspot.com) 
	    
	
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |