Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      Faux Faithful Abuse of the US Constitution
	 
	By James Zogby 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, January 16, 2011 
	
		
			
			  | 
		 
	 
	 In a display of faux piety, the 112th Congress opened its first day 
	of business by reading aloud the Constitution of the United States. 
	Referring to it as "our sacred text", one-by-one, over 130 Members of 
	Congress queued up to participate, each solemnly reading a few words before 
	giving way to a colleague who would read a few more.   The entire 
	affair was cloaked in the ritualism and reverence of a religious ceremony 
	and might have been dismissed as harmless, though a bit blasphemous, were it 
	not for its deeper purpose.    This tendency to make "idolatrous 
	worship of the American nation", its rituals, artifacts, and places, is as 
	old as the country itself. In times of war or social distress, such behavior 
	has always been more pronounced. What is of concern is when this “idolatry” 
	is not projected as a unifying force bringing Americans together to confront 
	a common threat.  In fact, more often than not, when we see this 
	phenomenon emerge it is to elevate and consecrate a particular 
	interpretation of "America" in order to use it as a club against opponents. 
	  There were aspects of this in evidence in the chauvinism used to 
	mobilize support for World War I. In the post war period, the intensity of 
	these feelings morphed into an anti-foreign-born hysteria. Much the same was 
	at work in the World War II era, spawning another bout of xenophobia, and 
	again during the fractious civil rights/Viet Nam War era with "states 
	rights"/ pro-war advocates claiming to be the true patriots, denouncing 
	their fellow American civil rights/pro-peace advocates as "traitors"   
	Now with 9/11, two disastrous and unresolved wars, economic collapse, and 
	the loss of confidence in the institutions of government, we are once again 
	seeing the emergence of a movement bent on usurping "America" and its 
	symbols to promote particular political goals.  We saw this tendency 
	begin to play out, in little though telling ways, during the Bush 
	Administration. It became especially pronounced during the 2008 election as 
	supporters of Republican candidates John McCain and Sarah Palin wrapped 
	themselves in the American flag, claiming to be the true patriots, while 
	casting doubt on Barack Obama's commitment to the nation (and even to his 
	being an American citizen). Much was made of the fact that Obama didn't 
	place his hand on his heart during the singing of the National Anthem or 
	that he didn't wear a "flag pin" on his lapel, etc. This elevation of 
	trivial and arbitrary practices into required rituals is more the work of a 
	religious cult than politics. And the notion that only those who share a 
	particular set of ideas and practices are adherents of the "true faith" is 
	itself the hallmark of doctrinaire religion, not politics.    Now with 
	the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and the "Tea Party" in the lead, 
	this claim of being the "real American patriots" facing down opponents who 
	threaten the country is full blown. They make much of collective displays of 
	patriotism, casting themselves as latter day revolutionaries who are saving 
	the Republic. In their minds, it is not that they "also" love America and 
	want to defend its Constitution - rather it is "only" they who love America 
	and they are fighting to "take our country back" - with the implication 
	being that it was in "alien hands" not just an opposing party.   This 
	is what brought us to this ritual reading of what they call "our sacred 
	text" and their insistence that all new legislation cite the Constitutional 
	authority granting Congress the right to consider such a measure. What this 
	is about, of course, is the Tea Party's aversion to "big government" and 
	their belief that the policies put in place by Democrats (whether health 
	care reform, an economic stimulus, new regulations for the financial sector, 
	etc) have violated some article of faith of the "American creed”.     
	  What is strange is that even while Congress is reading the 
	Constitution, giving it near scriptural status as “sacred text” most 
	Americans, from right to left, have no idea what it is or what's in it. In 
	the first place it is not “sacred”. It was written by men, and has been 
	changed by men (although, one would not have learned this listening to this 
	reading, since the Republican leadership only allowed a version to be read 
	that omitted those embarrassing parts that had been amended over time – 
	those, for example, dealing with slavery or women). In addition, Congress, 
	under both parties, has repeatedly passed laws that have violated the 
	Constitution’s fundamental principles. Polls show that less than one half of 
	Americans know what exactly the Constitution is (many confuse it with the 
	Declaration of Independence) and a mere few percent can name a majority of 
	the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution (known as the "Bill of Rights"). 
	In fact, provisions put in place during the Bush Administration and 
	maintained by the Obama White House have gutted fundamental rights 
	guaranteed by more than one-half of the Bill of Rights - without the Tea 
	Party and company raising a peep.     It is this that makes the entire 
	situation so worrisome. This is not about reality or politics, it is 
	something quite different.  We are not seeing opponents of the 
	President engage in rational debate. What they are doing is more akin to the 
	“faithful” confronting the “infidels”. In this scenario, the “believers” 
	have made religious dogma of their views, transformed them, in their own 
	minds, into the one and true interpretation of the "American faith" and they 
	are ready to denounce those who disagree as enemies of the Republic. They 
	are not yet in charge, and so the damage they may do is still limited. But 
	the ritual this group foisted upon the Congress the other day shows they 
	have influence and will use it to run roughshod over the institution, with 
	too few of their colleagues willing to call them out.
  
	  
	  
	  
       
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |