Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       
      Ramadan: Wealth and Poverty  
	  By Yamin Zakaria 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 9, 2011 
	     Don’t worry; this is not a religious sermon. I am neither an 
	  Imam, nor a priest of any kind. Although fasting in the month of Ramadan 
	  is a spiritual act for Muslims, it may offer valuable lessons that are 
	  beneficial to all humanity, and provide some insight into human nature.  
	     To abstain from consuming food and drink, and sexual intercourse, 
	  is to break from the usual routine. By observing this annual fasting it 
	  gives the hard working organs in the body a bit of a rest, allowing them 
	  to recuperate, like the annual service done on a car. For a more in-depth 
	  analysis of the physical benefits of fasting one can consult a medic, and 
	  there is plenty of literature out there. I am more interested in the 
	  collective social benefits that can be derived from the notion of fasting. 
	     In countries like the UK, in the summer time, this period of 
	  fasting extends from 3 AM to approximately 9 PM. My non-Muslim colleagues 
	  curiously ask me every year: do I really abstain from food and water for 
	  almost 18 hours every day for the entire month? The experience and the 
	  fear of the pangs of hunger, make human beings think about the fragile 
	  nature of life, and the value of food and drink. You would think the human 
	  race would naturally do their utmost not to waste food and drink, which is 
	  essential for survival, yet, despite witnessing poverty, there is huge 
	  wastage every year in the wealthy nations of the world.     
	  Apart from abstinence, Ramadan is also a time for giving and sharing. 
	  Whenever I would go to the beautiful Mosque (Masjid) in Medina or some 
	  other major Masjid with a couple of dates to break my fast, I would come 
	  back home with a bag full of food, as everyone rushing to give away 
	  something and collect the reward from their Creator. If the Muslims were 
	  in this frame of mind for the entire year, there would surely be a huge 
	  reduction in hunger.   When you witness so many people walking away 
	  with more food than they brought in, it proves that when the majority are 
	  actively engaged in giving and sharing there is an abundance of food. This 
	  is something I experienced during my university years; we used to attend 
	  the weekly gathering at the local Mosque run by the group Tablighi Jamat. 
	  For most of us, it was an excuse for socialising; the students were not 
	  really interested in the boring sermons that were needlessly repeated over 
	  the weeks. After the lectures came the main event – dinner.    Some 
	  individuals brought food for themselves, but many others did not. It was 
	  shared as people grouped themselves in an ad hoc manner and ate on the 
	  floor. At the end, surprisingly everyone was full, and plenty of food was 
	  left over. How was that, given that not everyone brought food? It 
	  demonstrates a simple point about sharing and satisfaction. When the food 
	  is shared there is more available and individual consumption is not likely 
	  to be as high, because they don’t feel compelled to finish everything, and 
	  know that there are others who need to eat as well. So one eats just 
	  enough to satisfy the hunger; otherwise, human beings tend to eat more 
	  than their bodily requirement as individuals. Human greed is the age old 
	  vice, even mentioned in the ten commandments of the Bible. The proof of 
	  greed is there all around us, obesity is a problem in most wealthy 
	  nations.    If we amplify this model of sharing, most communities 
	  can collectively satisfy themselves; those with excess food and those with 
	  very little will balance out, and those with little requirement and those 
	  with more will also balance out; thus, the extremes of gluttony and 
	  poverty can be avoided to some extent. But, in the real world, there is 
	  famine in Africa and obesity in the western world. Despite all the 
	  technological advances, poverty has not been eliminated. Rather than a 
	  space-race, a race to eliminate poverty and disease would have been far 
	  more useful.    Those fasting in Ramadan should certainly appreciate 
	  poverty, where people are forced to fast continuously; the people in 
	  Somalia today will not have an abundance of food and water waiting for 
	  them when the time approaches to break their fast. The solution to poverty 
	  suggested by Islam is to share and distribute, and the general command is 
	  to circulate wealth. There are many verses that extol the believers to 
	  donate money, not because it is a favour to the poor, but to relieve the 
	  obligation on their neck. On the Day of Judgement, it is the wealthy and 
	  rich with excess wealth that will be accounted and not the poor and 
	  destitute. The solution seems to be focused on the ‘distribution’ of the 
	  wealth rather than production of wealth; because mankind will naturally 
	  produce driven by need. The real test is: can they collectively share the 
	  wealth amongst them where people of different capabilities and needs 
	  exist?    A knee-jerk response to poverty is to maximise production 
	  and accumulate; this is the doctrine of capitalism, and individuals are 
	  taught to be greedy and selfish, which dents the notion of wealth 
	  circulation. Those who have acquired wealth do not let it trickle down 
	  enough.    In contrast to hoarding, there is something magical about 
	  sharing, it binds the human family, which we appreciate less and less 
	  because living in a materialistic society, our values and our traits tells 
	  us to accumulate as much as possible, even if it means to monopolise the 
	  market and deprive others. I often wonder with amazement how large 
	  corporations with billions in their pockets would go to great lengths to 
	  deprive the small competitor. Isn’t there enough for everyone? How much 
	  can a human being consume in his life time? Why are there billionaires and 
	  millionaires? Can you really consume that much money over a life time? 
	  Even if we live for an average of 60 years, a third of that is spent 
	  sleeping.    The experience of hunger through fasting should also 
	  lead to a change in attitude towards food; it should be treated with 
	  respect, not wasted needlessly. Yet, our habit is to accumulate more food 
	  than we can consume out of fear of poverty or driven by greed. The 
	  households in the UK and other wealthy western nations, including oil-rich 
	  Muslim countries waste large amounts of food every year, even through the 
	  recession. Just think, if you spent less, the excess money could be given 
	  in charity which would mean helping someone in genuine need, rather than 
	  wasted food ending up in the bin. It might be one small contribution to 
	  eliminate the food-mountains in one place, and transfer some of that to 
	  where it is scarce.      Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org) 
	  London, UK   
	  
	  http://yaminzakaria.blosgspot.com)   
       
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |