Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       
      Libya After Qadhafi 
  By Lindsey 
	  German and Andrew Murray 
	SWC, Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 29, 2011 
	    
	  LIBYA AFTER QADHAFI: STATEMENT BY STOP THE WAR COALITION   The 
	  fall of the Qadhafi regime in Libya marks 
	  yet another turning point in what has been a truly remarkable year in the 
	  Middle East. The victory of the rebels, backed by Nato bombing in a six 
	  month campaign initiated by the British and French governments, also 
	  heralds the rehabilitation of a discredited doctrine -- that 
	  of 'humanitarian intervention' -- after the debacle of Iraq and 
	  Afghanistan.    The defeat of Qadhafi 
	  is now being used to justify military action on the grounds that it has 
	  helped the Arab revolutions. David Cameron declared outside Downing Street 
	  22 August 2011, 'This has not been our revolution, but we can be proud 
	  that we have played our part.'   The hypocrisy of Cameron is 
	  staggering, given the role of British and other western governments in 
	  backing up dictators and despots in the region -- only halted in some 
	  places by the actions of the Arab people themselves.    The Nato 
	  intervention has not been for idealistic values. It has been about regime 
	  change, so that a leader more acceptable to western governments and 
	  business could replace Qadhafi.   
	  Right to the end, NATO was bent on a military victory and bringing the 
	  Transitional National Council (TNC) -- the Benghazi administration -- to 
	  power in Libya by force of arms. All proposals for talks to achieve a 
	  political solution – whether from within Libya or outside - have been 
	  brushed aside.   While many Libyans may welcome the outcome, and 
	  will be glad to see the back of Qadhafi, it 
	  has a number of negative aspects.    From the international point of 
	  view, the most significant thing is that the government of another Arab 
	  state has been changed by external force applied by the big imperial 
	  powers. There is no real suggestion that the TNC could have come to power 
	  unaided. The NATO military intervention, stretching beyond breaking point 
	  the mandate given by the United Nations, has been decisive.   This 
	  will not be the end of the story. The experience of Iraq teaches that the 
	  overthrow of a regime under such circumstances by no means signifies the 
	  end of the war. Whether those who have supported Qadhafi 
	  will meekly accept the authority of a new government imposed under such 
	  circumstances is open to question.    Whatever happens, the deep 
	  divisions within Libyan society remain. Likewise, given that the TNC is an 
	  amalgam of forces, ranging from the democratic to the Islamist to leaders 
	  who are the direct employees of western interests, it may have neither the 
	  capacity to resolve existing differences nor the ability to prevent the 
	  emergence of new ones, within its own ranks.   David Cameron spelt 
	  out the close role Britain and the other western powers will expect to 
	  have in running Libya, and in how much detail they have been planned, 
	  including ‘stabilisation experts who have been planning for this 
	  moment…for months.’   Under these circumstances, the main demand 
	  must be an end to all forms of NATO interference in Libya – not just the 
	  end of the bombing, but the withdrawal of special forces and a halt to all 
	  forms of political interference. The only solution to the crisis in Libya 
	  will have to be a Libyan solution. Recent history, from Iraq to 
	  Afghanistan, teaches that too.   But beyond that, we must recognise 
	  the danger that even a passing 'success' in Libya may embolden the US, 
	  British and French governments to believe that the idea of 'liberal 
	  interventionism', discredited after Iraq, can be revived on a broader 
	  scale. Of course, however it ends the Libyan conflict has not gone as 
	  expected and none of the leaders of the aggression have dared introduce 
	  ground troops into the war. Nevertheless, the danger of extending the 
	  intervention to Syria as part of a programme to control and suppress the 
	  'Arab Spring' is not inconceivable and must be mobilised against.   
	  The old rulers will not be missed if and when they depart. The decisive 
	  issues – genuinely democratic and popular regimes across the Arab world, 
	  the exclusion of great power interference in the region and justice for 
	  the Palestinian people – remain in the balance and require our solidarity. 
	    LINDSEY GERMAN, National Convenor, Stop the War Coalition  
	  ANDREW MURRAY, National Chair, Stop the War Coalition 
	  
  
	  STOP THE WAR COALITION
  Email
	  office@stopwar.org.uk Tel: 
	  020 7801 2768 Web: 
	  http://stopwar.org.uk 
	  
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |