Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
US Elections:
America's Right Turn
By Stephen Lendman
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 8, 2010
Since the 1980s, neoliberalism dominated US politics under
Democrats and Republicans. Bush I continued Reagan policies. Clinton
hardened them. Bush II much more, and Obama so far matched Star Trek, going
where no administration went before. Count the ways. They're manyfold,
favoring business over popular interests, yet he's accused of being
socialist. On November 2, angry voters responded, shifting right
despite favoring many left of center issues, a combination of outrage and
angst overriding their best interests. Go figure because what they got will
incense them more. During hard times, election cycles repeat a
common pattern. Angry voters throw out bums for new ones, discarding them
next time around for still more, mindless of what an earlier article
explained - that US democracy is fake. The criminal class in Washington is
bipartisan. Mock elections pretend to be real. The process is mere kabuki
theater run by political consultants and PR wizards, supported by major
media misreporting, featuring horse race issues, not real ones.
Everything is pre-scripted. Secrecy and back room deals substitute for a
free, fair and open process. Party bosses chose candidates. Big money owns
them. Key outcomes are predetermined, and cheated voters get the best
democracy money can buy, each time no different than others. Recall
November 2008. Promising change after eight George Bush/Republican dominated
years, Obama won the most convincing non-incumbent victory in over 50 years,
sweeping Democrats to large majorities in both houses. On election
night, the mood celebrated hope for progressive change, an end to imperial
wars, and a new day for America. When word came around 10PM, expectant
thousands in Chicago's Grant Park erupted with chants of "yes we can,"
hoping Obama would deliver at a time of deepening economic duress. Two years
later, disappointment, disillusion, frustration, and anger erupted over
promises made, then broken, once again betting new faces will govern better
than old ones. Think again. New York Times writers took the lead
reporting it, Jeff Zeleny and David Herszenhorn, for example, headlining,
"Restive Voters Divide Power in Congress as GOP Surges to Control of House,"
saying: They also came close in the Senate "as discontented voters,
frustrated about the nation's continuing economic woes, turned sharply
against President Obama just two years after catapulting him into the White
House." It showed in how they "indiscriminately ousted Democratic incumbents
who loyally supported Mr. Obama's agenda," decidedly anti-populist whether
or not they know it. Times writer Carl Hulse headlined "Republicans
Oust(ed) Old and New Democrats Alike," throwing out babies with their bath
water. It's what usually happens in hard times, especially when big money
effectively manipulates minds, pushing them right, not left, that means over
the cliff through planned austerity when massive stimulus and much more are
needed. Universal single-payer healthcare for one. Taking money out
of politics another. Holding real elections, not fake ones. Giving Congress
back what the Constitution's Article 1, Section 8 mandates - the power to
create money and control the value thereof, not Wall Street bankers using it
to their advantage. They delivered hard times, transferring wealth from the
majority to themselves. Obama and Congress support them, Republicans as
guilty as Democrats. The best Times writer Peter Baker could say was
"Somewhere along the way, the apostle of change became its target, engulfed
by the same currents that swept him to the White House two years ago."
Instead of denouncing his shameless betrayal, he said only that he "must
find a way to recalibrate with nothing less than his presidency on the
line." Shifting right, not left, is what he means, what Clinton
called triangulation. Obama earlier promised austerity, more favors for
business, hardline immigration policy, deficit reduction, continued imperial
wars without saying it, and more for privilege, not people, buying into
Reagan's "trickle down" economics, what, Bush I called "voodoo."
All a Times editorial could do say is that "voters....sent President Obama a
loud message: They don't like how he's doing his job, they're even angrier
at Congressional Democrats." Republicans exploited it "turning out their
base....Democrats....fail(ing) to rally their own." Besides noting a shift
right, hard issues weren't mentioned, instead saying "his opponents (were
able) to spin and distort what Americans should see as genuine progress in
very tough times." For Wall Street, defense contractors, Big Oil,
and other corporate favorites perhaps, not Main Street that drove voters for
change. What's coming, however, will infuriate them, what no major media
report will explain. For example: -- greater than ever military
spending; -- expanded wars, perhaps to new theaters at a time most
Americans want them ended; -- privatizing Social Security and
Medicare, letting Wall Street racketeers exploit them for profit, scamming
the public at the same time; -- privatizing public education as well
as increasingly at the university level; -- trashing labor rights;
-- hanging American workers out to dry; -- ignoring growing
millions facing foreclosure; -- letting poverty and unemployment
spiral out of control; -- yet eliminating unemployment compensation
and other social benefits, saying they're "unaffordable;" tax cuts for the
rich, however, will be maintained; -- enacting more police state
laws on top of many in place; and -- turning America darker, a
reactionary direction pitting bread and butter issues against ruling elites,
both parties offering bipartisan support, especially new incumbents and
their leadership. The big money backing them demands it, assuring
they'll get what they bought. It's how US politics works, more than ever
delivering the best democracy money can buy. As a result, American workers
are on their own, out of luck, and unsupported by both parties. Democrats
are no different than Republicans. As a result, governance in
America is dysfunctional. The electorate remains mindless to reality. Only
grassroots activism might change things, sweeping all the bums out, electing
progressive independents, reversing repressive and corporate friendly laws,
as well as enacting a new constitution by national referendum, letting the
electorate decide, not states or Washington. A utopian vision?
Absolutely, adopting working class France's 1968 slogan, "Be realistic, Ask
for the Impossible" through collective political action, the only way
"impossible" goals ever are reachable, social justice topping the list.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio
News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time
and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy
listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
|
|
|