Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
AIPAC, Israel's Lobby, Imposes Crippling Sanctions
on America ... Again
By Grant Smith
IRMEP, Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org, March 15, 2010
The Israel lobby's campaign against US and international
corporations doing business with Iran is gearing up this week.
The tip of the spear is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
sponsored expansion of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996. If signed into
law by president Obama, the legislation would institute onerous new
monitoring to ensure exports never enter Iran, along with mandatory
divestment from and penalties for any corporations discovered doing business
in Iran. A new type of "office of special plans" at the Treasury Department
that AIPAC and its think tank lobbied to create by executive order in 2004
is also on the warpath. Stuart Levey, the head of the office of
"Terrorism and Financial Intelligence" is traveling to Switzerland, Saudi
Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman "pointing out that they face
dramatic risks by doing business with Iran." Israeli Deputy
Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon finished a long set of meetings urging the US
National Security Council to impose harsh sanctions on Iran. The New
York Times started the week with a list of corporations doing business in
Iran and their US government procurement revenues. Most companies on
this list long ago appeared on hit lists compiled by AIPAC for quiet
divestment campaigns in state legislatures across the country. The New
York Times ominously highlights in red any company that may be a "possible
violator of the Iran Sanctions Act." National Public Radio's Scott Simon,
after reading it, was apoplectic. He fretted aloud on the air whether
US companies and subsidiaries on the target list were "betraying their
country's national security interests." What should Americans make
of this drive to label all companies doing business with Iran unpatriotic
smugglers? First, they should consider the source of the multi-tiered
Iran sanctions drive. Then, they should start getting angry.
The proto Israel lobby was born in the cradle of a real arms theft and
smuggling operation [pdf] that relentlessly preyed on the United States in
the 1940s. Violating US arms export controls and bans on weapons
transfers to the Middle East, this network certainly did "betray national
security"--but managed to establish a small state in Palestine. The
Director of US Central Intelligence judged that "U.S. national security is
unfavorably affected by these developments and that it could be seriously
jeopardized by continued illicit traffic in the implements of war." That was
an understatement, but none of the financiers of the arms smuggling network
ever faced any consequences. When The Pledge, a tell-all book about
the smuggling network, was published in 1970 the Department of Justice
received public protests about the vast unpunished arms smuggling. The
Internal Security Section duly wrote and internally circulated a 9-page book
report about the people, dates, and crimes committed. The Chief of the
Foreign Agents Registration Unit then responded to one protester that any
arms smuggling prosecutions would be barred by the statute of limitations,
though he did forward complaints to the FBI and State Department.
The Israel lobby further developed the ethos that "no crime for Israel would
be punished in the US" when it allegedly stole and smuggled US weapons grade
uranium from NUMEC, "an Israeli operation from the beginning" according to
CIA Tel Aviv station chief John Hadden. A secret nuclear arsenal
would allow Israel to initiate "The Samson Option" pulling down the entire
world if it were ever threatened--a capability judged worth all the stealing
and law breaking. Isaiah L. Kenen, a propaganda officer for the
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs office in New York in 1948, made it his
business to infiltrate Israeli government mandates into US political party
platforms while dodging Department of Justice orders that he register and
conduct his business openly as an Israeli foreign agent. Like AIPAC
this week, Kenen even used the New York Times as a trumpet in his November
2, 1961 Near East Report to deny that Dimona was a nuclear weapons plant.
Six weeks after the DOJ cracked down with its final Foreign Agent order on
Kenen and company in 1963 after a massive (Israeli-funded) stealth
propaganda and lobbying campaign that rivaled the one currently unfurling in
the US, Kenen was forced to abandon his American Zionist Council front for
the Israeli government, and incorporated AIPAC in Washington, DC.
AIPAC went on to stage a full assault on US governance--from attacking the
sanctity of our electoral process to trafficking in classified national
security information--all to acquire unprecedented power on behalf of its
foreign principals. The most relevant example of AIPAC-Israeli
government tag-team law-breaking went on display this week in the form of 49
declassified FBI files. In 1984 71 major US corporations and worker
organizations said "no" to an earlier AIPAC economic power grab (a demand to
lower all US import barriers to Israeli products while allowing Israel to
continue blocking US exports). Israeli minister of economics Dan
Halpern stole [pdf] a US government document containing proprietary
information and business secrets supplied by US industries most opposed to
the Israel Lobby's economic power grab. Halpern passed it to AIPAC,
which made great use of it to undermine the entire advice and consent
process. Douglas Bloomfield, AIPAC's top lobbyist, even made an
illicit copy of the classified document after AIPAC was explicitly ordered
to return it to the US government (rather than ever do time in jail,
Bloomfield now fantasizes about militarily playing the United Arab Emirates
off Iran). The aftermath of this earlier economic crime against US
industry has now become clear. By locking many US products of export
quantity out of Israel, the trade agreement has delivered an $80 billion
dollar cumulative deficit (adjusted for inflation) to the US since enacted.
In contrast, last year all other (legitimate) bilateral agreements with such
countries as Singapore and Morocco actually produced a $86.33 billion total
trade surplus to the US. AIPAC's trajectory clearly indicates it is a
true believer of Julius Caesar's dictum "If you must break the law, do it to
seize power, in all other cases observe it." But does such ill-gotten
might make right? Americans should be outraged that a foreign lobby
like AIPAC is actually trying to write the rules--when warranted application
of the law would have abolished it years ago. AIPAC and other nodes of
Israel's lobby successfully broke important US laws to seize power in
America. They now expect US private enterprise and workers --the
world-s best--to open their own little "offices of special plans" to
carefully track company products, profits, and investments in the name of
Israel. But this new tax ignores some mighty important facts.
Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and there's no
evidence that it is anywhere near producing nuclear weapons.
Non-signatory Israel, with its vast secret arsenal of nuclear
weapons--likely built with uranium stolen (but never paid for) from the
United States--suddenly demands rule of law from America. Laws drafted
by AIPAC. (And by the way, it'll cost taxpayers at least $76 million
to clean up the nuclear waste at NUMEC.) Israel and its US lobby
actually think Americans will go for all of this, that we're a forgetful and
obedient lot, who don't care much about our laws, economy, or jobs--who are
just aching to get into AIPAC's newly fabricated economic straightjacket.
Better think again.
***
The full report hyperlinks to a new internal Department of Justice
document acquired and placed online yesterday by the Israel Lobby Archive:
http://www.irmep.org/ila/slater/09171970_DOJ_Pledge.pdf,
joining a new 49 page archive of declassified FBI files of an
investigation into AIPAC-Israeli economic espionage and theft of US
government property placed online on March 10 at:
http://irmep.org/ILA/economy/default.asp
=============================
FBI Investigates AIPAC for
espionage and theft of government property in 1984
Documents
Declassified
FBI files reveal a long running espionage and
theft of government documents investigation targeting
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and
the Israeli embassy in Washington DC during the
1984 US-Israel Free Trade
Area negotiations. The FBI uncovered allegations that an
agent of the Israeli intelligence services worked
undercover as a member of AIPAC's staff.
A quarter century after the tainted
negotiations led to passage of
US-Israel preferential trade pact, it remains the
most unfavorable of all
US bilateral trade agreements,
producing chronic deficits, lack of US market access to Israel and ongoing
theft of US intellectual property.
Document/File
Date |
Contents |
06/20/1984 |
The Washington
Field Office (WFO) of the FBI notifies the FBI Director of the
possible theft of classified documents from the International Trade
Commission and begins an investigation into Israeli espionage.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's possession of the
documents and their circulation in the US Congress by "Israelis" is
noted. The report states the President's negotiating position
was "compromised" and speculates that the document was "stolen or
given to the AIPAC."
|
06/21/1984 |
WFO reports to the FBI Director
that "Israelis were offering copies of this document to members of
Congress because the United States Trade Representative was slow in
delivering them."
The United States Trade Representative's legal
counsel receives confirmation from AIPAC that it possessed the
report. The FBI documents that "the president's negotiating
position concerning a trade agreement between the United States and
the State of Israel is compromised because
this report divulges those products and industries that have been
identified by the International Trade Commission as being the most
sensitive to imports from Israel."
|
08/13/1984 |
Preliminary WFO investigation to
the FBI Director reports that "the confidential report on trade with
Israel was likely taken while being prepared at the International
Trade Commission (ITC)" and that "this confidential report contains
no national defense information and was originally classified to
protect the U.S. bargaining position during negotiations with
Israel."
"Personnel at USTR and ITC were most angered by
the fact that the American-Israel Public
Affairs Committee (AIPAC) had apparently attempted to influence
members of Congress with the use of a purloined copy of the ITC
report and had usurped their authority."
"WFO files disclose that AIPAC is a powerful
pro-Israel lobbying group staffed by U.S. citizens."
"WFO files contain an unsubstantiated allegation that a member of
the Israeli Intelligence Service was a staff member of AIPAC."
WFO sets objective "To identify
individuals responsible for the unauthorized disclosure of the
contents of the ITC report to the government of Israel and employees
of AIPAC through interviews of ITC personnel and congressional staff
aides."
|
08/16/1984 |
Airtel transmission with
handwritten notes. |
08/30/1984 |
The FBI Director reports that "In discussions with the Department of
Justice (DOJ) regarding captioned case, DOJ opined that captioned
matter did not represent a violation of the espionage statute as it
was reported that no national defense information was utilized in
the preparation of the report. DOJ advised that a violation of the
theft of government property {TGP} status has occurred and that the
merits of the TGP violation should be presented to the local United
States Attorney's Office for a Prosecutive Opinion." |
09/19/1984 |
Special Agent in Charge Norman A.
Zigrossi agrees that matter lacks prosecutive merit. |
09/21/1984 |
U.S. Attorney declines
prosecution under theft of government property (TGP) statutes.
|
12/06/1984 |
Washington
Filed Office notifies FBI director that it terminated the
investigation. |
11/01/1985 |
Assistant Attorney General
Stephen S. Trott of the Criminal Division of the Department of
Justice orders the FBI director to reopen the investigation as a
theft of government property and disclosure of confidential business
information crime. The FBI is directed to report to the Public
Integrity Section. |
11/15/1985 |
The FBI director relays the DOJ
letter and orders the Washington Field Office to reopen and
"expeditiously conduct investigation in accordance with the
provisions of Section 52, Manual of Investigative Operations and
Guidelines." |
11/22/1985 |
Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is
reported arrested outside the Israeli
embassy in possession of classified US national defense documents. |
12/17/1985 |
Special Agency
John Hosinki reports a December 3, 1985 meeting with AIPAC in which
he demands information about "1. Who at AIPAC had knowledge of this
report being in the possession of AIPAC, 2. Who received or handled
this report at AIPAC, 3. Who furnished this report to AIPAC," and
the current residence for an AIPAC employee with knowledge of the
matter.
Attempts to contact the AIPAC
employee between December 3 and December 11 "proved negative".
|
12/19/1985 |
FBI special
agents interview a former AIPAC employee (Margaret "Peggy" Blair
according to the book Spy Trade)
in the presence of her lawyers. |
12/19/1985 |
FBI special
agents interview an AIPAC employee (Ester Kurz according to the book
Spy Trade) in the
presence of her lawyers. |
01/08/1986 |
Washington
Field Office advises the FBI Director that a diplomat at the Israeli
embassy in Washington D.C. (Dan Halpern according to the book
Spy Trade) passed the
stolen classified document to AIPAC.
"Logical investigation dictates
that BLANK be interviewed regarding this matter.
However, due to the fact that BLANK has been grated immunity against
prosecution in the U.S., WFO is considering this matter closed.
WFO will re-open this matter if authority is granted regarding the
interview of BLANK."
|
01/14/1986 |
Washington Field Office presents a summary of the investigation.
"Appropriate officials at the U.S. Department of State and at the
U.S. Department of Justice will be requested to review this matter
and make a determination regarding the feasibility of interviewing
[the Israeli diplomat] concerning captioned matter." |
01/28/1986 |
A
supervisory special agent (SSA) orders that "captioned investigation
be reopened by WFO. SSA BLANK stated that Department of Justice had
requested additional interviews be conducted in furtherance of this
investigation. Specifically, SSA BLANK requested that BLANK of the
Israeli Embassy and Mr. BLANK of AIPAC be interviewed by WFO
personnel to obtain all details regarding their contact with
documents mentioned in this investigation." |
02/13/1986 |
FBI special
agents interview an AIPAC employee (Douglas Bloomfield according to
the book Spy Trade) in
the presence of his lawyers.
Bloomfield
explains that AIPAC duplicated the original classified document
before returning it to the USTR:
"Prior to
returning the document, BLANK asked to have a duplicate copy of the
document made so that the staff of the AIPAC could further examine
the report."
|
03/13/1986 |
FBI special
agents interview an Israeli diplomat (Minister of economics
Dan Halpern according to the book
Spy Trade)
"...advised
that at some unrecalled time in 1984 he received this USITC report
pertaining to free trade between American and Israel. BLANK
advised that he received this document from someone that he would
not identify. He indicated that he received this information
in his official capacity as a diplomat and that it would be against
the principals of diplomatic work to divulge any information
pertaining to the identity of the individual who provided him the
report."
|
03/31/1986 |
Washington Field Office
presents a summary of the Investigation. "In view of the above
information and due to the fact that BLANK has claimed diplomatic
immunity in this matter, active investigation into this matter will
be discontinued at WFO. Washington Field will be contacted by the
USTR or the ITC if pertinent information is developed regarding this
or similar incidents." |
01/14/1987 |
US Department of Justice
orders the FBI director to close the investigation. |
|
|
|