Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Iraq War Whistleblower, David Kelly, Was
Probably Assassinated
By Christopher King
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, July 27, 2010
Dr David Kelly’s postmortem report must be released
Christopher King calls on Britain’s coalition government to
release the postmortem report – so far kept secret – on the death of Iraq
war whistleblower and UN weapons inspector David Kelly, who allegedly
committed suicide but is suspected of having been murdered by US or Israeli
agents.
Ken Clarke and Dominic Grieve, respectively Britain’s
new secretary of state for justice and attorney-general, have had time to
settle into their chairs and start looking for things that need repairing
after the disastrous Blair-Brown government.
One of the first things
to settle is the death of the UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Dr David Kelly,
who was hounded by the Blair government for correctly saying that its
propaganda in selling the Iraq war was “sexed up”. He was then found dead
near his home, having allegedly committed suicide. The circumstances are
suspicious and his postmortem report is secret.
At the present time I
and a lot of other people are disposed to believe that he was assassinated,
probably by the Americans or Israelis. If there’s no coverup, why did the
Blair-Brown government seal the details of his death for 70 years? I
wrote about this
two months ago and there have been many calls for openness since Dr Kelly’s
death. Suspicion of an assassination coverup is not going away. In January
this year, Lord Hutton claimed that the postmortem report on Dr Kelly was
available but no independent person has seen it yet. Doctors who have asked
for it have been refused.
It’s worth reading the
piece in the Independent by Tom
Mangold who says that anyone who believes that Dr Kelly was murdered must
also believe in the tooth fairy. This gentleman claims some sort of
acquaintanceship with Dr Kelly, although not friendship, despite the
Independent’s sub-title to this story. Mai Pederson, a lady who was a
friend, believes that he was murdered.
Until about a year ago I believed the suicide story. That is no longer
possible however, either for me or Mr Mangold. “The facts of Dr Kelly’s
death are contained in his postmortem report. I, along with many other
people, want to know what is in it.” As Tom Mangold is an investigative
journalist he will be familiar with the material about the Kelly affair. It
is therefore incomprehensible that he does not give weight to the first of
two critical factors that cast doubt on the government’s story and does not
mention the second: The government’s refusal to make Dr Kelly’s
postmortem report public A group of seven medical practitioners has
publicly stated that
it was “highly improbable” that Dr Kelly died from the severed ulnar artery
that Lord Hutton gave as the cause of his death. Mr Mangold tells us
what he “believes” about this case. Belief has no objective value. Anthony
Blair, for example, believes to this day that he was right in getting rid of
Saddam Hussein, although to do so he played a leading role in killing a
million Iraqis, created four or five million refugees and devastated the
country in the invasion that Dr Kelly opposed. Men have an infinite capacity
to deceive themselves in their beliefs – and then attempt to deceive others.
We need facts. "The government constantly reduces our privacy on the
basis that if we are innocent of wrong-doing we have nothing to hide. So
will our new government continue to hide the facts?” The facts of Dr
Kelly’s death are contained in his post-mortem report. I, along with many
other people, want to know what is in it. Nor is Mr Mangold a medical
practitioner. If seven medical doctors state that it is extremely unlikely
that anyone can die from a severed ulnar artery, it is very close to a fact
that Dr Kelly’s death was not from this cause and is good enough to justify
their request for release of his postmortem report – which should not be
secret in any case. The government constantly reduces our privacy on the
basis that if we are innocent of wrong-doing we have nothing to hide. So
will our new government continue to hide the facts? Let us not complicate
matters at this point with yet another public inquiry. The situation is very
simple. Seven well qualified doctors have formally asked the
attorney-general to make the postmortem report available to them. The
government should let them see it. No good reason has ever been given for
its secrecy and none can be envisaged.
Delay means that conspiracy
theories proliferate. There has recently been a
report that Dr Kelly’s dental
records were stolen and then replaced around the time of his death. Dental
records are important in matters of identification. Does this mean that
there might be doubt about the identity of the body that is described in the
postmortem report under Dr Kelly’s name? Of course, delay assists a coverup
by making investigations more difficult.
This matter is a
straightforward test of the Cameron-Clegg government’s honesty which needs
to be established following the lies and deceit of the Brown-Blair
government. On the record of our politicians’ vote for the illegal Iraq war,
it is no longer possible to accept any government as honest until proven
deceitful.
Having been elected on a platform of support for the
Afghanistan-Pakistan war, the successor to the Iraq war and with as little
legitimacy, this government’s credentials have been
poor from the beginning.
Unhappily they are unlikely to improve. Judging by our “unapologetic
pro-American” prime minister’s recent acceptance of the UK’s “junior
parnership” to the United States, by his
statement in the Wall Street
Journal, we may expect the Cameron-Clegg government to continue to support
US aggressive warfare, kidnapping, torture and assassination world-wide as
well as the misuse of the UK’s armed forces in war crimes. To what end?
Whatever our politicians’ reasons they have nothing to do with the best
interests of the UK and its citizens. Particularly if the assassination of a
UK citizen on UK territory might be part of this “special relationship” of
fawning subservience.
Its abandonment of international law and
unashamed, open practice of assassination is good reason to make the United
States the prime suspect in the death of Dr Kelly. Christopher King is a
retired consultant and lecturer in management and marketing. He lives in
London, UK.
|
|
|