Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

News, May 2020


Al-Jazeerah History


Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  


Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  




News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)




Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

Share the link of this article with your facebook friends


As Coronavirus Spreads in Brazil, Bolsonaro's Fans Adopt More Nazi Symbos, Call for a Military Takeover

May 12, 2020 

Pro-Bolsonaro Brazilians salute him with a Nazi gesture, May 12, 2020 Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro attends his supporters during a protest in favor of the government and against the coronavirus lockdown, on May 3, 2020

Bolsonaro Supporters Greet President Using Nazi-Like Salute

Heil, Bolsonaro? The salute is added to other Nazi symbologies with which the current government has been flirting; Bolsonarists claim that it is "prayer".

By Arkady Petrov -

Rio Times, May 12, 2020


The Nazi symbols with which the Bolsonaro government and its supporters have flirted have become increasingly obvious. The very slogan of Jair Bolsonaro's campaign in the 2018 election, "Brazil above all, God above all," is a direct reference to a Nazi German catchphrase, "Deutschland über alles," which in English means "Germany above all". The passage was even part of the German national anthem but was removed after the end of World War II.

Last Friday, May 8th, the President's supporters extended their right hand in a greeting to the former reserve captain during Bolsonaro . . .

Bolsonaro Hastens Measures to Benefit Loggers, Arms Dealers, and Evangelicals

Between April and May, the President signed an ordinance that relaxes inspection and purchase of ammunition and calls on the Treasury to stop churches from paying debts to the Union. Government dismisses IBAMA officials.

By Arkady Petrov - Brazil Times, May 12, 2020


President Jair Bolsonaro's conservative agenda keeps moving amidst the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed thousands in Brazil. Overshadowed by the serious health, political and economic crisis that has enveloped the country, a number of government scandals in the environmental, education, and public safety areas, among others, have occurred over the past 70 days since Covid-19 reached the country.

The Planalto has managed to set in motion policies that are clear nods at its main electoral bases: evangelical churches, ruralists, timber companies, mining companies, loggers, and arms dealers. Everything done to the detriment of indigenous . . .

Niterói and São Gonçalo Start Lockdown; Rio will Also Enforce Restrictions

In Rio, some of the main streets in the west and north zones are expected to be similarly restricted soon.

By Xiu Ying - Brazil Times, May 12, 2020


The cities of Niterói and São Gonçalo, in Greater Rio, started a lockdown of roads on Monday, May 11th, as a measure to try to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus.

The lockdown of part of the city caused large traffic jams in Niterói's access and exit avenues. Initially, the lockdown will be enforced until Friday, May 15th.

In the city of Rio de Janeiro, access to some of the main streets of the west and north zone neighborhoods should be similarly restricted this week.


As Brazil’s challenges multiply, Bolsonaro’s fans call for a military takeover

By Terrence McCoy and  Heloísa Traiano,  May 12, 2020


Flipping through the news several weeks ago, Carlos de Lima Belucio grew alarmed. People were panicking over a strange new disease. Other countries were locking down. Then it hit him: There was only one way to save the country. Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro had to stage a military takeover.

Ignoring warnings to stay inside, Belucio began joining demonstrations urging Brazil’s armed forces to remove the institutions that impede Bolsonaro’s rule. Using violence, if need be. The country, he said, must stay open.

“The pandemic is just a smokescreen,” said Belucio, 43, who lives in the northern city of Belém. “With a military regime, it would all be better.”

As Latin America’s largest nation grapples with its gravest health and economic challenges in a generation, and Bolsonaro flounders under the pressure, the specter of the armed forces is looming larger over public life than at any time since the fall of the military dictatorship in 1985.

As scandals have engulfed his presidency, the right-wing former Army captain has broadened the powers of the generals and former generals in his administration, allowing one to introduce a large economic aid package, undercutting his own finance minister. His most radical supporters are urging a military takeover of the government — and Bolsonaro has attended their rallies, amplifying their calls.

“We are not going to tolerate interference — our patience has ended,” he told a crowd in Brasilia calling this month for the removal of congressional leader Rodrigo Maia. “We have the people on our side, and we have the Armed Forces on the side of the people.”

The threat of military force in domestic affairs — no matter how unlikely — has further unsettled the unpredictable political situation in this nation of 210 million. More than 11,000 people have died of a disease the president has dismissed as a little flu. The economy is collapsing. Many hospitals have reached capacity. The jobless poor are worried about going hungry.

As allies abandon Bolsonaro and calls for his removal gain momentum, the political lines are being drawn. Critics are calling Bolsonaro a mortal threat to democracy. Supporters counter that Bolsonaro is, in fact, the only man who can save Brazil — from a corrupt ruling class, from officials imposing restrictions on movement and commerce, from checks and balances that have blocked the mandate Bolsonaro won with 55 percent of the vote in 2018.

In Bolsonaro’s recent moves, analysts perceive a reckless gambit for political survival. His approval ratings are cratering. Two powerful and popular officials, with the crucial portfolios of health and justice, have left his cabinet. The supreme court has authorized an investigation into allegations made by one of them, former Justice Minister Sergio Moro, that Bolsonaro improperly tried to influence the federal police to potentially protect political allies, including his sons.

The Portuguese words for “Out Bolsonaro,” “Coward,” “Facist,” “Ignorant,” “Genocidal,” “Worm” and “Criminal” are projected on a building in São Paulo in March to protest Bolsonaro’s dismissal of the coronavirus as a threat. (Amanda Perobelli/Reuters)

Now more than ever, the thinking goes, he needs the military — not only for its resilient popularity, but also to scare off impeachment calls.

“His latest actions look to me like someone who has so isolated himself that, desperately, he’s trying to turn people and the armed forces against other institutions,” said David Magalhães, political scientist at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo. “I don’t know what could happen from here.”

Bolsonaro, whose signature campaign gesture was to point his finger to mime a handgun, has at several points since his inauguration last year hinted at deploying military force to maintain order. While protests roiled much of South America last year, he asked congress for authority to use troops to stop any violence that might occur. His son and his finance minister took the rhetoric even further, musing it might be necessary to dissolve congress and shut down the press if, as Eduardo Bolsonaro said, “the left radicalizes.”

Analysts and former military officials say it’s unlikely Bolsonaro will marshal a military takeover of the country. Such a move would be opposed by the people, the Brazilian elite and the military itself.

“The Navy, Army and Air Force are state bodies that believe that independence and harmony between government branches is essential to govern the country,” Defense Minister Fernando Azevedo e Silva said in a statement after the Brasilia rally. “The Armed Forces will always be on the side of law, order, democracy and liberty.”

But the fact that discussion of such an intervention has even entered the public debate indicates the enduring appeal of the military in a country that has never fully reckoned with what occurred during its 21-year rule.

Demonstrators stand with a banner that reads “We want the armed forces in power” at the Alvorada Palace in Brasilia. (Andre Borges/AP)

From 1964 to 1985, the U.S.-supported government sharply curtailed political and press freedoms, institutionalizing censorship and torture. A truth commission in 2014 found that opponents were shocked with electric prods, had insects introduced into their bodies and were even crucified. More than 430 people were killed or disappeared.

Unlike Latin American countries that aggressively pursued, prosecuted and jailed former military leaders for their roles in dictatorship crimes, Brazil hasn’t fully held to account the perpetrators of political violence.

Brazilians disagree bitterly over what transpired during that time, down to the semantics. To historians and human rights investigators, it was a military dictatorship. But to apologists, it was the “military regime” — a time they say when the problems of today’s Brazil were far less prevalent. Crime was far less pervasive, their argument goes. So was corruption. Communism was held at bay.

One of the most vociferous defenders of the dictatorship has been Bolsonaro. As a young man, he served 15 years in the Army. As an older man in congress, he talked endlessly about the military. He defended the dictatorship. He said its actions, if anything, weren’t extreme enough. His rantings relegated him to the fringes of political life.

“He always says, ‘we people, of the military,’ but for a lot of time, that wasn’t so,” said João Roberto Martins Filho, one of Brazil’s most respected military analysts. “He plays up a reverence for the military, but the reality is that he uses the armed forces.”

In recent years, as the country has been through one political convulsion after another, nostalgia for the military regime — and calls for a military intervention — has steadily grown. Soaring gang violence, corruption scandals ensnaring a succession of presidents, the impeachment of one and the imprisonment of another: All of it contributed to the feeling that Brazil had lost control. A strong, even authoritarian, hand was needed to right things.

Bolsonaro tapped into that political current, riding it from the fringes to the presidency. The military, which once considered him an eccentric who didn’t represent its ranks, quickly fell in behind his bid.

“The root of this problem now was the moment that military legitimized the candidacy of Bolsonaro,” Filho said. “But why did the armed forces, and particularly the military, accept this? They did because they saw in him their only possible chance for the right to claim victory. The military is conservative and has always been hurt that it was removed from politics.”

But how Bolsonaro has suddenly thrust it back into politics — in the middle of a pandemic, as extremists call for a takeover — isn’t what many in its ranks wanted, analysts and former commanders said.

Roberto Sebastião Peternelli Junior, a former general who’s now a congressman, said there was no legal basis for either the removal of Bolsonaro or a military takeover. Nearly everyone in the Armed Forces, he said, agreed with him.

“All of us in the reserve, we were schooled in the same principles of ethics and morals,” he said. “I can’t see the military acting in any other way.”

 Terrence McCoy is the Brazil correspondent for The Washington Post, based in Rio de Janeiro. He joined The Post in 2014 and has been a staff writer on the local, national and foreign desks.


Share the link of this article with your facebook friends

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.




Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & &