News, October  2003, www.aljazeerah.info

 

วแฬาํัษ

Home

News Archive

Arab Cartoons

News Photo

Columnists

Documents

Editorials 

Opinion Editorials

letters to the editor

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Islam

Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people 

Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

News Photo

Peace Activists

Poetry

Book reviews

Public Announcements 

   Public Activities 

Women in News

Cities, localities, and tourist attractions

 

 

 

US gradually scaling down its role in Israeli-Palestinian conflict

By Karin Laub

The Associated Press

Jordan Times, Friday-Saturday, October 31-November 1, 2003

 

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM — Call US when you're serious about disarming resistance — that's the message Palestinians are getting from US mediators who have scaled back their presence in the region.

The apparent disengagement comes amid a deadlock in the US-led "roadmap" peace plan, Washington's growing troubles in Iraq, and the distractions of the US presidential election campaign.

Israeli and Palestinian critics warn that reduced US involvement will likely lead to more bloodshed, further harm America's image in the Arab world, and in the end bring on another round of US mediation.

The roadmap was launched with great fanfare in June, but implementation was halting from the start. A turn to the worse came with the Sept. 6 resignation of reform-minded but ineffectual Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas.

In line with US expectations, Abbas tried to wrest control of the security forces from Yasser Arafat, but was instead outfoxed by the veteran leader.

Abbas' resignation created turmoil, and his successor, Ahmed Qureia, has been unable to form a stable government.

The United States says it is reserving judgement on Qureia — who is seen as more accommodating to Arafat than Abbas — until he puts together a Cabinet and takes control of security.

US President George W. Bush said last week that Abbas' ouster "stopped good progress towards a Palestinian state." "And when the Palestinian Authority comes up with a leader who is willing to genuinely fight and dismantle terrorist organisations, the process will pick up where it left off, and move forward." The Palestinian bombing attack on the US convoy in Gaza may have reinforced that view. Three American security guards were killed, and FBI investigators were stoned by an angry crowd at the scene.

Meanwhile, John Wolf, the head of the US team monitoring compliance with the roadmap, has been on home leave since before the Gaza attack. A US State Department official said Wolf's return to the region is "not being ruled out." The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the administration remains in daily contact with both sides.

"There is engagement, but don't forget that in the absence of concrete steps that are not ours to make, there is a limit to what we can do," the official said.

With the sides here so far apart on the issues, many previous peace moves have required active US mediation — or pressure — to move forward.

But an ambitious effort by the Clinton administration to broker a comprehensive peace settlement collapsed three years ago, and the Bush administration was initially reluctant to get into the Mideast quagmire.

In the wake of the Iraq war, however, the United States hoped that showing a renewed commitment to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would help repair its badly damaged image in the Arab world.

Palestinian officials are now saying they have been told by the Bush administration it is waiting for a crackdown on the resistance groups that have killed hundreds of Israelis in the past three years of fighting.

Three Palestinian legislators heard that message last week in a meeting in Washington with David Satterfield, a senior State Department official. "We were able to understand from him that the Americans will stay outside until the Palestinians take some steps," said Kadoura Fares, a member of the delegation from the ruling Fateh movement.

The roadmap requires a clampdown, but Palestinian leaders, including Abbas, have balked at using force against Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fateh resistants, saying they will not risk setting off civil war.

Qureia has proposed negotiating with the groups to get them to declare a unilateral ceasefire, and then taking modest steps such as shutting down rocket factories and smuggling tunnels, and a ban on carrying arms in public.

Israel has rejected the truce offer, saying it is just a ploy for resistants to buy time and replenish their arsenals.

The Americans also oppose the "truce first" approach, Fares said. Satterfield told the visiting legislators that the Palestinians need to take action to show they are serious.

The Palestinians argue they cannot go after armed men while Israel conducts its own hunt. "How can we set up a (police) checkpoint, while there is fire from Israeli tanks and helicopters?" Fares said.

Zalman Shoval, an adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said Israel and the United States agree that the deadlock will continue until there is a change in Palestinian leadership.

"The best one can hope for is to bring down the violence and manage the conflict, but conclusive solutions will have to wait for a change on the Palestinian side," Shoval said.

Palestinians accuse Sharon of perpetuating the impasse by rejecting a ceasefire, keeping up army raids, enforcing suffocating travel bans and expanding Jewish settlements in violation of the roadmap.

They say the Israeli leader is exploiting the vacuum to ram through the idea of a tiny Palestinian state in parts of Gaza and about half of the West Bank.

"He is systematically implementing his vision to destroy the Palestinian national identity," said Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi. "It's a sure recipe for anger, desperation and hostility." Israeli analyst Joseph Alpher warned that by staying on the sidelines, the United States risks harming its own long-term goals, particularly the vision of a two-state solution to the Mideast conflict.

Partition of the land will become increasingly difficult, as settlements expand and populations become more entangled — a momentum that is impossible to stop without intense intervention, he said.

With Israelis and Palestinians left to their own devices, the conflict is bound to get worse. "If it's worse, it's bad for American interests in the Arab world and Iraq," Alpher said.

"The United States will get blamed."

 

 
Earth, a planet hungry for peace

 

The Israeli apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03).

 

The Israeli apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in the West Bank (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03).

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.

editor@aljazeerah.info