|
Hundreds of civilians killed in US war in Afghanistan |
||
|
|
WASHINGTON, 22 July —The US military has killed hundreds of
innocent civilians in Afghanistan in recent months because it has
preferred to rely on the flawed intelligence of local warlords than risk
casualties among its own forces on the ground, according to a survey
published in yesterday’s New York Times. The survey, based on research work by the non-profit organization
Global Exchange, counted more than 800 innocent civilians killed — a
count that is likely to rise as the ongoing survey extends beyond the 11
population centers inspected so far into more remote villages. What differentiates the Afghan campaign from previous US military
engagements is that the civilians, increasingly, have not been caught up
in strikes on legitimate targets or killed as a result of bombs going
astray — what in military parlance is known as "collateral
damage" — but rather have been deliberately targeted by precision
bombers acting on flawed instructions from their superiors. The sense of unease at the continuing US campaign to uproot Taleban
and Al-Qaeda fighters reached a head earlier this month when a series of
airstrikes on the village of Kakrak, in Oruzgan province, mistakenly
targeted a pair of engagement parties. Local officials counted 54 dead,
most of them women and children, and at least 120 wounded. The New York Times report was based on reviews conducted over a
six-month period of 11 locations where airstrikes killed as many as 400
civilians. The reviews found that even when genuine military targets
were identified, civilians were sometimes killed as a result of the
Pentagon’s use of overwhelming force. Pentagon officials say their strategy has shifted in recent months to
increased use of ground forces to hunt down remaining fighters for the
Taleban and Al-Qaeda, but that continuing airstrikes still often have
tragic consequences, according to the Times. The report follows a
controversial US attack this month on villages in Oruzgan Province,
where airstrikes killed at least 54 civilians. American commanders, however, rejected the notion that they may be
relying too heavily on air power. "We painstakingly assess the
potential for injuring civilians or damaging civilian facilities, and
positively identify targets before striking," said Col. Ray
Shepherd, spokesman for the US Central Command in Tampa, Florida. Afghan officials are beginning to demand a greater say in the choice
of US targets, the Times reported. "We have to be given a larger
role," Abdullah Abdullah, the Afghan foreign minister, said in an
interview with the newspaper. "If things do not improve, well, I will certainly pray for the
Americans and wish them success, but I will no longer be able to take
part in this." Meanwhile, field workers with Global Exchange, an American
organization that has sent survey teams into Afghan villages, told the
Times they have compiled a list of 812 Afghan civilians who were killed
by American airstrikes. The Global Exchange workers said they expect
that number to grow as their survey teams reach more remote villages. In another incident, 13 people were killed and six others injured
when a bus was blown up by a land mine in Afghanistan, the United
Nations said in Kabul yesterday. The bus drove over the device on
Saturday in mine-littered central province of Bamiyan. "The driver of the bus was told by the villagers to avoid this
part of the road because of land mines but for reasons unknown he did
not heed their warning," a UN statement said. The explosion
occurred some 500 meters from the Band-e-Amir Lake, 60 kilometers west
of the town of Bamiyan. Afghanistan is one of the most heavily mined countries in the world
after 23 years of conflict, with an estimated 10 million mines, and
accidents are frequent. Bamiyan was the scene of heavy fighting for
years under the previous Taleban regime before it was ousted last year.
(The Independent) |