Letters to the Editor, November 5, 2005

From Mark Dankof to Dr. Habib Saddiqui

Your article entitled Neo-Conservatism: The Cult of American Ascendancy or Moral Bankruptcy? is simply outstanding. I am passing it along to my editor at the paleo-conservative BATR--Old Right news, SARTRE at:

http://www.aljazeerah.info/4o/NeoConservatism%20The%20Cult%20of%20American%20Ascendancy%20or%20

Moral%20Bankruptcy%20By%20Habib%20Siddiqui.htm

I will post it as necessary reading in my next Reads of the Week column for SARTRE, which also makes the rounds with a number of other agencies and the NewsReleaseWire.com network of Broadcast Interview Source in Washington, D. C.

Mark (Dankof)

http://www.ExpertClick.com/19-2281

CNN Reports Sharon carrying out Rabin's work on splitting the land

C&NN. did a story (on November 4) about Rabin's unfulfilled desire for peace and splitting the lands in the Peace of the brave.

The "key story line" being pushed was that Rabin "had not agreed on what lands he would take." And Sharon's intentions in Gaza was the carrying out of his work in dividing the lands.

This is their "New Big Lie." that their Public Relations groups will be pushing in the West.

I have used the discussion point successfully many times that Rabin & Arafat made an agreement & hand Shake "For Peace of the Brave" which was denied to both the Israeli People and those of Palestine by the Bullet of a Zionist Assassin, the son of a Zionist Rabbi.

There is a need for a book on the history, talks and agreements of these Democratic Leaders "Rabin & Arafat." It should document the real Record. I remember that Rabin's Wife will have nothing to do with Sharon as she felt it was Sharon who led to his assassination.

looking for an Author to that book

Ps. Just another update on Rabin's Rally Nov. 14. "Israel pulls out of Gaza and still no peace"

It looks like a Major PR. effort will be made to Link Sharon to carrying out the work of Rabin. And future confusion the American Public.

Ron Kennedy

Freedom in Christ

See, the generation that founded America, they didn't create a representative form and system of government in order to make themselves and others free. They created the country and government that they did to protect a freedom that they already possessed because they already were free. Most and/or many had entrusted themselves to the saving care of Christ and had yielded to him in obedience. Through this, they came to have Christ dwelling in them and they in him. As a result they participated in the freedom that only Christ possesses. America and its system of government was designed, in part, to preserve this freedom that many of the generation of people who were in America in the 1600 and 1700's already possessed. It is a brilliant attempt to preserve a freedom that one already possesses, not create a freedom for people who don't possess it. That is how I see it. I think I am more right than wrong here.

wa salaam,

Shelley Zellmer