Readers' Letters  and contributions, May 22, 2003     Al-Jazeerah.info

This is an independent website. It is not related to aljazeera tv or any other similar name

 

الجزيرة

News Archives 

Arab Cartoonists

Columnists

Documents

Editorials 

Opinion Editorials

letters to the editor

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Islam

Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people 

Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

News Photos

Peace Activists

Poetry

Book reviews

Public Announcements 

   Public Activities 

Women in News

Cities, localities, and tourist attractions


 

 

The words ' occupying power' in international law has reflected the positive role of Western Alliance, in liberating European countries from the clutches of Nazi occupation forces. However, in the present context, when under UN laws, no member nation can hold territory by conquest, the term 'occupying power' has no liberating connotations to be rewarded for any illegal invasion. While the UN is currently debating new resolutions on Iraq, and the 'rights and duties' of the 'occupying power' is underlying all discussions, the overwhelming fact of the illegal invasion of Iraq, a UN member country, outside any mandate or endorsement by the UN Security Council or General Assembly, cannot be set aside, ignored, tacitly papered over or approved, much less rewarded by allowing special status or privileges to the US/UK invaders.

Their legal position as invaders should be first dealt with for its illegality and they should be made to account for their acts, made to pay not only reparation payment to Iraq but a penalty, either nominal or substantive, to the World body, accepting their crime, before their future actions could be covered by any UN Security Council resolution.

In an open debate, their acts of commission and omission should be put on record of the UN, so that a future course of action can be evolved to deal with any such outlaw behaviour by dictators and despots.

There cannot be a tame reaction by the UN members, as if it business as usual, while thousands innocent civilians have died in Iraq, for no fault of theirs and hundreds of thousand tons of deadly bombs were dropped on civilian areas as well as on environmentally very fragile desert land, without any resource or traditions to rehabilitate it to its natural state.

Both US and UK should be made to pay personal damages to each and every civilian killed by their deliberate and willful bombings on Iraqi people and its quantum should have direct relations to amounts paid to victims of the supposed Libyan downing of the Jetliner, which was the latest standard of justice as established by the Western countries themselves.

There cannot be two separate norms of justice for the Western big powers and the smaller countries of the Middle East or the Third world.

GHULAM MUHAMMED, MUMBAI, India

 


 

Warsaw Ghetto Reenactment:  Come to Israel this summer!  It's authentic!

     Are you a World War II buff?  Do you collect the memorabilia, know all the battles by heart, visit the famous battlefields, read all the books?  Would you like to experience the true look and feel of that period?  Then come on down to Israel this summer!

     Israelis have spared no expense to recreate the famous Warsaw Ghetto in almost exact detail.  The sunken eyes, the famished children, the guard towers, the house-to-house arrests, the closing of universities, the burning of books, the little girl in the red coat, even the Final Solution!  It's all here.  Come on down!

      This reenactment is not for farbs and amateurs.  This is authentic! There is real blood on the streets of Palestine!  You can actually see a two-year-old shot before your very eyes. 

     Send for a list of hotels and motels available.  Discounts for seniors.  Plenty of free parking.  This event is sponsored by the United States Congress.   Thank you for your $8.5 million dollars a day, guys.  It wouldn't be possible without you!

                    Best regards, Jane Stillwater, Berkeley, CA

     "Imagine a world where EVERY child is wanted, nurtured, protected and loved:  World Peace in one generation!" 

Scenes from the reenactment:

Sunday, May 4th, 2003

By Carel Moiseiwitsch, Gordon Murray and Drew Penland

     WE recently returned from the Occupied Territories of the West Bank and Gaza where we volunteered with the International Solidarity
Movement (ISM). Upon returning to Vancouver, we were shocked by the
disconnection between our experience of Palestine and its portrayal
in the Canadian media.

     During our stay there, we accompanied and supported people whose
daily lives were being interrupted, interfered with and strangled by
the Israeli military. We saw humiliation, pain and death inflicted
on ordinary Palestinians.

     Back in Canada, we saw newspaper stories about the heroic Israeli
victims of barbaric Palestinian terrorists.

     Our point is not that Israeli suffering is irrelevant or that
Israeli deaths are inconsequential, but that ! the North American
media treat Palestinian suffering and death as irrelevant and
inconsequential.

     In the West Bank and Gaza, we observed soldiers beating medical
personnel and using them as human shields, taunting young children
to throw rocks at their tank so they could respond with live
ammunition, forcing women with infants to stand for hours in the
cold a few meters from their homes,destroying food and water
systems, and firing heavy machine guns into residential streets and
buildings.

    In short, the Israeli military did not seem to view Palestinians as
human beings. Soldiers at checkpoints gave us dire warnings that all
Palestinians would kidnap or murder us. On the contrary, the
Palestinians we met were incredibly warm, hospitable and generous,
and many Israelis work bravely to uphold human rights, including
some who join ISM in Palestine.

 !     The Israeli military claims many Palestinians they kill are "armed
militants" or at least "suspected militants". The vast majority have
not been tried or convicted of anything, but we are expected to
trust this instant justice. The logic seems to be that since the
army doesn't target civilians, all dead Palestinians somehow
deserved their fate -- even a kid throwing stones at a tank that
could withstand an artillery shell. According to human rights
groups, 85 per cent of the Palestinians killed in the Occupied
Territories are civilians.

      Israeli soldiers in Tulkarm boasted to us about killing the local Al
Aqsa Brigades leader and a man described by the Israeli army and
several media outlets as his "aide", Badia Karoq. According to a
dozen people we interviewed, Badia was not a militant. He was simply
the hard-working manager of a sweet shop.

    !   We were among the first people to enter Badia's shop after he was
killed. When the shooting started outside in the street, Badia hid
in the attic of the shop, unarmed and wearing his shop uniform. An
Israeli soldier came to the attic and riddled him with bullets,
taking the bottom half of his face off and soaking the floor in
blood.

     According to his family who live in a village nearby, Badia helped
support them when he was growing up by taking odd jobs, such as
picking wild herbs in the mountains. They say he was hardworking and
honest, and his salary was supporting his entire family, including
his elderly father, when he waskilled.

     The Israeli army is killing and wounding obvious non-combatants such as medical workers, journalists and international human rights
activists with increasing frequency. Between March 16 and April 12,
2003, the Israeli forces ran over! and killed Rachel Corrie from the
U.S. with a military bulldozer and shot both American Brian Avery
and British activist Tom Hurndall in the head. Hurndall is currently
on life support and is not expected to survive.

     In the Avery and Hurndall attacks, the Israeli military claimed they
were firing at "armed militants". But several eyewitnesses reported
to us that there were no armed Palestinians or gunfire in the area
prior to either shooting. The Israeli army has already cleared
themselves of any responsibility in the death of Corrie -- who was
trying to protect a Palestinian house from demolition -- saying
she "recklessly" and "criminally" put herself in harm's way.

     The dehumanizing portrayal of all Palestinians as violent fanatics is endemic in our North American media. The mainstream press usually repeats the Israeli military's characterization of dead Palestinians! as "militants" or "terrorists" without proof or qualification.

     One typical example of such biased coverage was a Vancouver Sun
article on April 11, entitled "Gaza is proof of the problems peace
faces", in which columnist Stuart Bell quotes the bravado of angry
young men in Gaza as "proof" that Palestinians don't want peace.

       Bell fails to mention the Israeli Army violence that provoked their anger: 12 Palestinian civilians killed in the Gaza Strip in the
previous week, including four children, according to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights.

     In a single attack, Israeli Air Force F16s and Apache helicopters
fired four missiles at a car with two "suspected militants" in a
densely populated residential neighbourhood of Gaza City. Five
innocent bystanders were killed and more than 50 wounded, half of
them child! ren.

     Although armed resistance to a military occupation is permitted
under international law, Bell uses the loaded term "terrorism" to
describe the Palestinian armed struggle against an Israeli
occupation that has been declared illegal by the UN Security
Council. On the other hand, the Israeli army's frequent targeted
assassinations of "suspected militants", a grave breach of Article
147 of the 4th Geneva Convention, are described by Bell as "counter-
terrorism" and "policing".

     The Israeli occupation army's "policing" has killed more than 2,000 Palestinian civilians (including more than 450 children) and
demolished more than 3,000 Palestinian houses since September, 2000. That's taking police brutality to a whole new level

Curfews, Closures and Little Boys with too Much Power
May 18, 2003 -Ramallah-

     Only hours since a suicide bomber detonated himself on a bus in the French Hill section of Jerusalem. The IOF started its invasion and clamp- down of Ramallah. At 8:00 am I woke to heavy gunfire on Jerusalem
Street in the Southern neighborhood of Ramallah.  As looked out the
window I saw a barrage of APVs and Jeeps speeding down Jerusalem
Street towards the center of town.  

     It was the first time in my many visits to Ramallah that I heard
sustained gunfire in the normally quiet city. As I walked around the
apartment building, I was struck by the empty streets, normally
teeming with people. In the center of town there were reports that
the IOF vehicles were trying to start clashes with children. A few
small clashes did start. The soldiers also hijacked and stole keys !
of any vehicle out on the roads. Again it would be quite easy for
many citizens of Ramallah to be completely unaware of the curfew and
innocently get into their car to go to work. 

     Later in the day I was made aware of the escalating situation at the Qalandia checkpoint. It was completely sealed off, and many Palestinians were trying to get home to Ramallah so they were sneaking around the checkpoint only to be confronted by the extra soldiers on patrol. I was told that many men were beaten and arrested. A friend called me from the Al-Ram side of the Qalandia checkpoint wondering if I could help him pass. .

     As I walked towards the soldiers they all started screaming at me in
Arabic and several raised their guns towards my head. I held up my
hands, continued walking and said "speak English, I only speak
English." Then one guard said, "Don't take another step, STOP!! We
are closed, go away." I said, "I have an American passport and I
need to cross." I was standing about 2 feet from the soldiers, but
still he raised his megaphone and started screaming, 'I don't care
NO! ONE PASSES." At this point a Palestinian woman in a long
traditional Palestinian dress and hijab started begging the soldier
to pass. They pointed the gun right at her temple and
YELLED "Hallos." The Arabic word to "get lost." At this point I told
the soldier that he didn't need to blow our ears out with the
megaphone. We were 2 feet from his face and we could hear him
perfectly. I said "I knew his job might be stressful and difficult,
but he was just making the situation worse by treating everyone like
dirt.

      This little dose of reality was the last thing this tall, angry,
sweaty, enraged soldier wanted to hear. He told me to "FUCK OFF". I
didn't move. 

     The obnoxious soldier from the other side of the checkpoint had now
moved to the Al-Ram side of the checkpoint. The soldier continued
his constant babble into the megaphone, telling people they would
never be able to go home and they better leave or they would get
gassed again. I soon befriended a doctor standing beside me. This
man had an Israeli ID and well as humanitarian credentials and a
card signed by the highest ranking IOF soldier in the region saying
he should be given access through all checkpoints. He said he had
approached the soldier several times and was screamed at, humiliated
and denied access. We started talking about the behavior and
immaturity of these soldiers. Basically they were little immature
boys, with m16s and too much power. They had absolute power and they were going to treat us all like animals just because they could.
This soldier was actually enjoying torturing ! the crowd. He was
eelentlessly threatening us and laughing at the same time.

     The scary part was that if he shot any of us waiting to cross, he
probably would get away with it. There is no justice for
Palestinians and the worst part was I probably had to start kissing
up to that soldier just so he would let me pass. This is the irony.
The soldiers can brutalize you and badger you and still you have to sit there and take it because they have the power to say YES or NO..  It was the first time I really understood the racism, abuse and brutality Palestinians endured daily at these checkpoints.

     After about 2 hours a white military jeep approached our position
the doctor told me it was the captain and we had to get his
attention because he had the power to let us pass. As his stepped
from his vehicle a sea of people began begging him to pass. Any
gre! en Palestinian IDs were denied. I worked my way to the front of
the line with the doctor and eventually we were 2 of the 4 people
allowed to pass out of the hundreds waiting. I felt guilty as I was
given the approval to pass. 

     As I arrived at my apartment my friend soon greeted me. He had made it through. He said, "Hey.. it's just another day in
Palestine."


 

 

 

 

*** THE THIRD E-SYMPOSIUM ON CONFLICT PREVENTION ***

 You are invited to participate in the upcoming online e-Symposium on Conflict Prevention, sponsored by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and the Japan Times, with the support of the Tokyo Club.
Theme: “Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?  How Can Peace Be Achieved in Palestine, Chechnya and Other Conflict Zones?”

Dates: Thursday 22nd May to Friday 30th May

Times: 24 hours a day for nine days at the end of May

Place: Entirely on the Internet at http://www.dwcw.org/3rd_e-symposium/


All 22 of the panelists have been confirmed, and include conflict prevention experts from academia, government, the United Nations and Non-Governmental Organizations, representing a total of sixteen different countries on four continents.

The Presentations cover a wide range of topics and include:

Dr I William Zartman (USA), Director, Conflict Management Program, Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University: `Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Peacemaking in the Middle East`

Mr Ioan Mircea Pascu (Romania), Minister of Defense of Romania

Conflict In The International System: A Short Overview

Reverend Terasawa Junsei (Japan), Consultant to the International Peace Bureau:

From Chechen Genocide Towards a Vision of New Global Non-Violence

Professor Paul Eidelberg (Israel), President, Foundation for Constitutional Democracy

Solving the Arab-Israel Conflict

 

Ms Hannah Reich (Germany), Associate Researcher, The Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management

Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Representing an Asymmetrical Conflict



We are also honoured to have the participation of H.E. Mr Hoj-Ahmed Noukhaev, the Former First Deputy Prime Minister of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and Dr Eid Bassem, Director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group will also join the e-Symposium.   Registration details as well as more information on Presentations, Comments and Panelists are available online at http://www.dwcw.org/3rd_e-symposium/

The Presentations will be available for viewing on the opening day of the e-Symposium, Thursday May 22nd. Contributions from the public will be accepted from this day, but will only be available for viewing when the Open Public Discussions Session (III) starts on the third day of the e-Symposium - Saturday 24th May.  From this day until the end of Wednesday 28th May (midnight Japanese time), contributions and comments will be accepted from the general public in order to facilitate full-scale, round-the-clock global discussions online concerning the theme and ideas raised by Panelists.


We invite you to register at http://www.dwcw.org/3rd_e-symposium/

 

Inquiries can be directed to Deborah Sharp at the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention (tokyo@jccp.gr.jp).


Please forward this information to all colleagues, friends and mailing lists that might find this event of interest.

The more people that participate, the greater the success will be for conflict prevention.

 

 

 

 


 

 

OBL and CIA link, eh? Frankly, it doesn't matter anymore. The world doesn't

go by reasons anymore, nor it has the courage and integrity to speak the

truth. Therefore, any arguments on this matter would be totally fruitless.

However, let me briefly share whatever I know about OBL.

I first came to know about Osama Bin Laden (OBL) around 1993-4. His name and

stories began to appear in many confidential special economic reports in the

US.

For the Americans, Osama was an accidental discovery. When the Americans were

considering helping the Afghan freedom fighters in their cause, they

encountered OBL as an Arab who belonged to the famous Bin Laden family, and

moved to Afghanistan with the share of his wealth to help out the Afghan

civilians and the freedom fighters. He was not only financing the purchase of

arms and ammunitions for the freedom fighters, but also financing the

humanitarian cause for the injured fighters and civilians. Due to this very

reason, he bacame a foreigner hero among the Afghans.

His dedication to the cause of helping the suffering Afghans, his personal

sacrifice, and total dedication toward Islam made him a hero and model beyond

the borders of Afghan. Gradually, his popularity grew in almost all Muslim

countries.

For the Americans, it was an opportunity to get involved in a similar way.

They mainly extended their help through the Pakistani government. And kept

close ties with OBL. By keeping track of his movement and activities. They

also had a very good impression on him. And had a lot of respect.

Osama was not a combatant himself. At least not at that time. He may have

picked up the combat skills later due to necessity, for self defense. He was

a philanthropist.

After the departure of the Soviets from Afghanistan. His mission and support

continued for the cause of Bosnian, Chechnian, Kashmiri Muslims. And by doing

so, he gradually became a figure of Islamic leadership. His intentions became

clear, when he began to accuse the leaders of the so called Muslim countries

around the world for tyranny, oppression, puppetry, etc. And that's when the

problems began.

Now he is no longer a hero, but a villain. Because, now he is not only

opposing the established leadership of the Muslim world, but also

interfering with the secret games of the CIA around the world.

The rumor says that the CIA met OBL before the 911 attack to get him to agree

to take credit of the 911 event when and if it should happen. But he refused.

And by doing so, he became the target man for the American administration.

Mullah Omar of Afghanistan knew this. As such, he demanded proof from the

American government to support their claim that OBL is responsible for the

attack. He even offered a trail at a neutral location, but the Americans paid

no attention.

The "New American Century" had laid down the plans of Middle East conquest

long before 911. They just needed a party to claim all the responsibility of

such an attack. They were hoping that someone or some group would make a

claim, but nobody did. Therefore, America had to find its way through

intimidation and false pretext.

To me, at this point in time, it really doesn't matter whether OBL was a CIA

spook or not. Because, it is not going to change the course of history.

Depending on the regional media propaganda, people have their own image of

OBL. In the Middle East, he is still a hero. Where as, in the Western world,

he is a fanatic Muslim and a terrorist. The bottom line is, OBL is no longer

needed. The war has already begun, and it will continue for years to come.

Americans may have achieved a quick victory in their game of invasion, but they

won't be able to retain it for long. Israel will make sure that the US of A

falls on the ground on its face enabling them to take over the role of the

super power. Just wait and see.

John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net> said:

 

 


 

You may be interested in the attached transcript of a programme (About Woomera, by Debbie Whitmont) made by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on one of the detention centres into which Middle Eastern people were put when they attempt to seek asylum by arriving by boat.
The ACM company which is referred to now runs the Baxter Detention Centre about 100 miles south of Woomera.
 
Garry Bickley

 

Editor: Thank you. It's been published: About Woomera, Debbie Whitmont

 


 

 

Hello everybody

 

I agree with Br Daud.  It is a standard imperial war. In it's psychological component, it tries to divide the occupied people that everyone has sold out
 
ie the classical Nazi propaganda "Resistance is Hopeless"
 
I don't think Islam/Islamist are creation of the CIA, it is Islam which is providing the underlying resistance to the Empire.  Albeit the resistance is disorganized sometimes chaotic and quite often backfiring but the resistance is there
 
It is only a matter of time that an organized leadership develops leading to systematic mass resistance against the empire and it's stooges.
 
Rafe

 

 


 

 

Hello Every body:

I am an
Afghan American. I am sending this email to set some matters straight. Since 911, a lot of talk has been circulating about Muslim Fundamentalists work for the CIA etc and UBL is working for the CIA. All this is nonsense. These rumors especially are reiterated after Brzezinsky in his 1998 book stated that the US increased activities near Afghanistan and hence induced the USSR to invade Afghanistan. In addition, articles written on fundamentalism being created in Washington DC.

1. Sure the Americans wanted for the soviets to be humiliated the same way US was in Vietnam, and the US knew that the Afghans would fight with their lives and blood to defeat Russians--history attest to that--that is why Americans were optimistic of this happening.
2. Sure the Americans encouraged through Pakistan to have Muslims from other parts of the world to come to Afghanistan and join the Afghan Mujahideen.
3. Sure we had support from the US, however, the overwhelming--financial support, money to buy weapons etc--from Saudi Arabia. The so-called appropriation of Congress for Afghanistan went to humanitarian projects and to CIA's other covert operations--after all the CIA did not need to spend all of that money if the Saudis were willing to pay for the expense of Jihad in Afghanistan. The CIA was heavily involved in opium and heroin smuggling.
4. Then the US labelled the so-called allies terrorists overnight.
5. There might be elements that are used by the CIA but the overwhelming majority considers US the prime enemy of Islam and Muslims.
6. Frankly, there is truth only to some claims circulating on the net which are the followings:
Taliban and others were used by the US, so were others, however, those that fought in Afghanistan are fighting the US forces in Afghanistan.
7. Certainly there might be elements that were and are CIA assets--but that does not include Bin Laden. Why not?:
Because Bin Laden does not have any incentive to cooperate or join CIA. He is rich, he does not need money; he is a devout Muslim; he does not need power and popularity, if he did he would not have chosen the path that he did.

8. People that serve assets of CIA do so for financial reasons; common goals--ideals, and lavish lifestyle among other things.
9. UBL need no money. He does not need lavish lifestyle, he has forgone that long time ago from age 16 onward.

10. Finally he does not need anything from the US/CIA. He has the means to obtain them himself. So, this whole thing about he being CIA asset is nonsense.

Sincerely,


Miraki, PhD


 


 

 

Editor,

 
Your disclaimer notwithstanding,  and my overall appreciation of the analysis and content of the article sourced to your publication at: http://www.rense.com/general37/sisie.htm , contains the following unfounded allegation:
 
'...... Bin Laden may have started this process, ...... Bin Laden gave the Israelis, unwittingly, exactly what they needed, to expand their naming of "Terrorism" to include 9-11, ...'
 
My question is: Does Al-Jazeerah.info have any viable evidence that 9-11 was the result of a Bin Laden chain conspiracy?  To the best of my knowledge there is none, including the British 'white paper' discredited and forgotten.  It is my studied opinion that 9-11 was an psychological warfare provocation by the criminal cabal ruling the United States.  Their motives are clear, the means absolute, and cover-up nearly universal!
 
Bill Mitchell

 

Editor: This is the opinion of the author. It does not represent Al-Jazeerah's.

 

 


 

 
 Petition to safeguard Iraqi heritage

Urgent petition of International Scholars of Mesopotamia and the Near East to the United Nations and Unesco for the Safeguarding of Iraqi Cultural Heritage

Thursday April 10, 2003
The Guardian

"Mesopotamia" designates the land where human beings first built cities, organised complex states, formulated elaborate religious beliefs, invented writing, developed sophisticated visual and literary expression, articulated measures for maintaining law and justice. The list of humankind's momentous "Firsts from Mesopotamia" is too long to detail. Mesopotamian religious, literary, and artistic traditions represent the origins of advanced culture, and their value to world civilization is inestimable. Understanding of Mesopotamia illuminates fundamental aspects of Judeo-Christian tradition and of Islam, and Mesopotamia has ties as well to ancient Greece--chapters of human history that gave shape to the world we inhabit today.

The geographical realm of ancient Mesopotamia extends into the modern states of Syria, Iran, and Jordan, but for the greatest part lies within Iraq. As scholars committed to the study and teaching of the history and culture of Mesopotamia, many of whom have been guests of the Iraqi people, we have deep ties to persons in Iraq as well as a profound appreciation for the cultural resources preserved within its borders. The only access that our and future generations have to ancient Mesopotamia is through the ancient physical remains left behind. Each artifact, written text, and archaeological context is unique and irreplaceable. Once destroyed, that link to humanity's past is lost, to us and to our descendants, forever.

Students of a civilization reaching back more than 5,000 years, we are accustomed to taking a long-term view of history and historical events. The present military conflict in Iraq will come to an end. We hope it will end as quickly and with as little loss of life as possible, and with a minimum of damage to excavated and unexcavated ancient sites as well as museum collections. Destruction of Iraqi cultural heritage will result in devastating and irrecoverable losses to human civilization, and to participate in or allow such destruction may inflame resentment and anger throughout the world, particularly in the Middle East. We believe, as is also recognized by the people and government of Iraq, that the ancient cultural heritage of the Iraqi people is at least as vital to their future as oil reserves are to their country's economic survival. Rigorous efforts by US and allied military forces and whatever body oversees post-war Iraq to protect ancient sites and artifacts can only enhance future goodwill. We believe that education can be a powerful tool, that cooperation among scholars and educators can serve as a vital bridge between Iraqi and western people once the current conflict is over, and that steps must be taken now to protect the cultural heritage of Iraq before it is too late.

We, the undersigned members of the scholarly community devoted to the study and teaching of ancient Mesopotamia and Pre-Modern Iraq, urge the United Nations and Unesco to forward the following recommendations to US/allied military command:

1. That rigorous care be taken not to target archaeological sites directly or allow collateral damage to be inflicted on them

2. That rigorous care be taken not to target museums, universities, academic libraries, or other buildings housing resources for the study of Iraq's ancient and more recent past. In addition, it has been publicized that our Iraqi colleagues have put themselves at risk in order personally to try to protect these collections. Utmost care should be taken that they come to no harm; Iraq, and the rest of the world, needs these devoted scholars and other personnel for the future

3. That in the event a site or museum has been damaged, immediate efforts be made to control fires and otherwise consolidate compromised structures. Security details should be mounted immediately to protect the damaged site from looting

4. That international military, humanitarian, and other personnel posted to Iraq be instructed as to the ethical and legal consequences of removing antiquities from the country. As soon as possible, certainly no later than immediately after the close of the military conflict, security personnel should be trained in the identification of antiquities and stationed in order to halt further removal of cultural heritage materials from Iraq.

Further, we urge the UN and Unesco to ensure that whatever body oversees post-war Iraq implements the following recommendations immediately after the close of the conflict:

5. That security personnel be posted throughout Iraq at its many archaeological sites and museum storage facilities as soon as possible to halt future thefts. In the aftermath of the previous gulf war, Iraqi archaeological sites and museum collections suffered from extensive looting, the fruits of which continue to disappear into the international black market for illegally procured antiquities

6. That our Iraqi colleagues be continued in or restored to their positions in museums, archaeological projects, and universities

7. That the Iraqi Antiquities Authority be offered the assistance of specialists from around the world to work with them (a) to begin restoration and preservation of antiquities that have been damaged or compromised in consequence of the current conflict and from the past 12 years of looting, and (b) to aid in training the next generation of Iraqi scholars to continue this vital work

8. That whatever body oversees post-war Iraq be ready to offer material assistance to the Iraqi authorities and any concerned international agency prepared to apprehend and prosecute persons responsible for the theft and purchase of Iraqi cultural heritage materials, and to strive for the recovery of those materials and their restoration to the Iraqi people.

 

 


 
Troops 'vandalise' ancient city of Ur

Ed Vulliamy
Sunday May 18, 2003
The Observer

One of the greatest wonders of civilisation, and probably the world's most ancient structure - the Sumerian city of Ur in southern Iraq - has been vandalised by American soldiers and airmen, according to aid workers in the area.

They claim that US forces have spray-painted the remains with graffiti and stolen kiln-baked bricks made millennia ago. As a result, the US military has put the archaeological treasure, which dates back 6,000 years, off-limits to its own troops. Any violations will be punishable in military courts.

Land immediately adjacent to Ur has been chosen by the Pentagon for a sprawling airfield and military base. Access is highly selective, screened and subject to military escorts, which - even if agreed - need to be arranged days or weeks in advance and carefully skirt the areas of reported damage.

There has been no official response to the allegations of vandalism - reported to The Observer by aid workers and one concerned US officer.

Ur is believed by many to be the birthplace of the prophet Abraham. It was the religious seat of the civilisation of Sumer at the dawn of the line of dynasties which ruled Mesopotamia starting about 4000 BC. Long before the rise of the Egyptian, Greek or Roman empires, it was here that the wheel was invented and the first mathematical system developed. Here, the first poetry was written, notably the epic Gilganesh, a classic of ancient literature.

The most prominent monument is the best preserved ziggurat - stepped pyramid - in the Arab world, initially built by the Sumerians around 4000 BC and restored by Nebuchadnezzar II in the sixth century BC.

The Pentagon has elected to build its massive and potentially permanent base right alongside the site, so that the view from the peak of the ziggurat - more or less unchanged for 6,000 years - will be radically altered.

Each hour, long convoys of trucks heave gravel and building materials through checkpoints and the barbed wire perimeter extends daily.

There are reports that walls have been damaged by spray-painted graffiti, mostly patriotic or other slogans, and regimental mottos. One graffiti reads: 'SEMPER FE' - Always Faithful - the motto of the Marines, who stormed through this region on their way to Baghdad, and form a contingent at the base.

Other reports by groups who cannot be named for fear of losing access to medical patients being treated on the base say there has been widespread stealing of clay bricks baked to build and restore the structures at Ur.

The Army Public Affairs office at Ur refused to speak to The Observer.

 

 

 


 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.

editor@aljazeerah.info