Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

Opinion Editorials, March 2009


Al-Jazeerah History


Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  


Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  




News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)




Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.


While Arming Israeli War Criminals to Teeth, NATO Nations Pledge to Keep Gaza Armless, March 14, 2009

News Commentary

By Hassan El-Najjar

NATO countries have continued to arm the Zionist Israeli terrorist state to teeth, from enabling it to amass a nuclear arsenal, to nuclear-capable submarines, to the most advanced weapons of death and destruction such as F-16 and F-35, as well as DIME bombs.

At the same time, they have implemented a tight regime of sanctions and embargo, with collaboration from some Arab states, to deny the Palestinian people food or light weapons to defend themselves against continuous Israeli attacks for the last three years.

Today, instead of helping the Palestinian victims against the Zionist Israeli war criminals, NATO countries are discussing in London ways to tighten the siege of Gaza to make sure that Palestinians do not receive any piece of light arms, by imposing a maritime sanctions and embargo regime over Gaza.

All this is to force Palestinians to surrender to the Israeli conditions, particularly recognition of the Zionist state, which is in fact accepting the Israeli theft of Palestinian lands and being quiet about the Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity, perpetrated by the Israelis since 1948, particularly in the last three years, and climaxed last January.

The Zionist state has never announced its borders. If Palestinians are being pushed by the Zionist-controlled NATO countries to recognize Israel, which Israel are they pushed to recognize?

Is it Israel of the 1947 UN Partition Resolution? Or the one of 1949 Armistice agreements with Arab states? Or the One of the 1967 War of Aggression without the illegal settlements? Or the one of the 1967 war of aggression but with the illegal settlements?

They just want Palestinians to surrender to the Israelis by accepting the theft, the historical injustice of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, which changed them into refugees, and forgetting about all the war crimes committed against them by the Israeli terrorist war criminals during the last sixty years.

But why are NATO countries playing this immoral role in support for the Israeli aggressors and war criminals against their Palestinian victims?

Maybe the answers for the following questions could explain the NATO countries behavior.

Is it because these Israeli war criminals are helping NATO imperialists to intimidate Arabs and Muslims by showing them the brutality and savagery of Israeli attacks if they do not allow the imperialists to take over their resources?

Is it because international relations, dominated by NATO countries, are void of morality and ethics, and based only on mere materialistic and opportunistic interests?

Is it because the political leaders of NATO countries are mere figure heads who serve their Zionist masters, the real rulers of NATO countries?

We are living in an era of no shame, indeed!

 Nine NATO nations pledge to stop arms smuggling to Gaza

Date: 14 / 03 / 2009  Time:  09:49
Bethlehem – Ma’an/Agencies –

The United States, Canada and seven European states agreed to stop alleged weapons smuggling to the Gaza Strip using as interception at sea, information sharing and diplomatic pressure.

A senior British diplomat told Reuters that the agreement had been reached by experts from the nine nations at a meeting in London. In the pact, individual states are not obliged to carry out any specific action, and the diplomat said that naval vessels would not use force.

Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Norway also signed up to the loose “program of action. “
The agreement is being billed as a part of an international effort to stabilize an Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire in Gaza.

Hamas, the movement that holds power in the territory, has said that it has a right to continue importing arms, although the extent of its ability to do so is not known.

Israel and Egypt have maintained a near-total closure of Gaza's borders since June 2007. Currently the only reliable means of importing anything into Gaza, including food, fuel, and consumer goods, is through an elaborate network of tunnels maintained by smugglers.

The diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the program set guidelines for steps countries could take under international law. "What it does is provide a platform to start some form of practical cooperation," he said.

According to Reuters, the program read out by the diplomat says the nine countries, all NATO members, will "take action, to the extent that national legal authorities permit and consistent with international law, to support interdiction efforts."

"Such efforts may include enquiry, boarding, searching, stopping, seizing, or other efforts necessary to prevent transfers of arms, ammunition and weapons components," it said, but added that naval ships would not use force.

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.





Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent