News, May 2006, To see today's News, click here:





Arab Cartoons

News Photo



Opinion Editorial

letters to the editor

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine


Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

Peace Activists


Book reviews

Public Announcements 

   Women in News

Cities, localities, and tourist attractions



An Editorial Note From Al-Jazeerah: News articles may be reduced in size or slightly changed to conform to the Conflict Terminology  guide adopted by Al-Jazeerah. Changes also include correcting Arabic names and editing. So, readers are advised that news articles may not represent their original form in verbatim or size, according to the mentioned original sources.

Bush Supports Israeli Unilateral Plan, Inviting a Prolonged Conflict

By Hassan El-Najjar

Al-Jazeerah, May 24, 2004

This is a sad day in the history of humanity. The president of the perceived world superpower has announced his support for Israeli aggressors against their Palestinian victims.

He approved the Israeli unilateral plan to impose an unjust solution on the Palestinian people. It allows Israeli aggressors to keep a lot of the lands they occupied by force and stole from the Palestinian people. Palestinians will not accept injustice, as they have demonstrated so far, which means that the conflict will continue for decades to come.

After only six hours of talks between the US President, George Bush, and Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, Bush praised Olmert's unilateral plan to deal with the Palestinian people.

The Olmert plan imposes a one-sided Israeli solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Basically, it grabs major area of land from the West Bank that no Palestinian government would accept. The Apartheid, Land-Grab Wall becomes the border. This is unacceptable to Palestinians as it is built deep inside the Palestinian territory, not on the 1967 borderline.

With the executive branch of the US government following the legislative branch (Yesterday's anti-Palestinian House Vote), America confirms its status once again as an Israeli colony. American leaders in both branches of the government have put interests of Israel, as defined by Israeli leaders, ahead of the national interests of the United States.

What does a US support for an Israeli unilateral solution mean?

For Palestinians, it means more strangling, more starvation, and probably a lot of bloodshed.

For Arabs and Muslims, it means more invasions, more death, and more destruction.

For the American people, it means deeper national debt, more wars, probably a draft, and sky-rocketing oil and gas prices.

This is a sad day, indeed.

AP Headline: U.S. Praises Israeli West Bank Plan

By AMY TEIBEL Associated Press Writer

 May 24, 2006, 6:49 AM EDT


In a policy shift, the White House is praising Israel's plan to set its borders with the Palestinians and is convinced those boundaries could create side-by-side states if a negotiated solution proves elusive.

Yet the course that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert outlined to President Bush is detested by the Palestinians and avoids the contentious issues that have made peace and establishment of a Palestinian state unrealized goals.

Olmert, continuing his rounds in Washington with a speech Wednesday to a joint meeting of Congress, pronounced himself "very, very pleased" with both the atmosphere and the content of his talks with U.S. officials.

Likewise, the president said in a news conference after his White House meeting with Olmert that the Israeli leader had "bold ideas" for unilateral action should talks founder on the internationally backed "road map" peace plan.

Before Olmert arrived Sunday, the Bush administration had urged him to negotiate with the moderate Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, and bypass the new Hamas leadership.

A negotiated solution is the preferred route both for Bush and Olmert, though the president found merit to the prime minister's alternative approach.

"These ideas could lead to a two-state solution if a pathway to progress on the road map is not opened in the period ahead," Bush said.

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, an Abbas ally, welcomed Bush's call for negotiations. But he rejected the notion of an imposed solution.

"President Bush said the first option is negotiation," Erekat told The Associated Press. "There is no other option."

Olmert, making his first visit to the U.S. since winning election in March, said he intended to "exhaust every possibility to promote peace with the Palestinians according to the road map."

"I extend my hand in peace to Mahmoud Abbas, the elected president of the Palestinian Authority. I hope he will take the necessary steps which he committed to in order to move forward," Olmert said. (This is the Sharon condition on Abbas, i.e. fighting a civil war against all Palestinian resistance organizations before negotiations can start - Al-Jazeerah).

But, he warned, "We cannot wait indefinitely for the Palestinians to change. ... If we come to the conclusion that no progress is possible, we will be compelled to try a different route."

In Jerusalem, a senior Cabinet member close to Olmert said if Hamas does not recognize Israel and renounce violence (declare an end to resistance while the Israeli occupation continues) within six months Israel will move ahead with plans to unilaterally draw its final borders by 2010.

"If these things don't happen, we won't wait for years, but rather we will wait until the end of this year," Haim Ramon told Israel Radio. "This will be a year of diplomacy."

"First negotiations, and after the negotiations, if it doesn't succeed and it becomes clear that there is no (Palestinian) partner, we will move ahead with the consolidation plan," Ramon said.

Olmert gave Abbas a tall order, saying after six hours of meetings and dinner with Bush that Abbas would have to disarm Palestinian militant groups (i.e. Palestinian organizations resisting the Israeli occupation); the Palestinian government would have to recognize Israel; and previous agreements would have to be fully put in place.

Olmert told reporters he would meet with Abbas, but did not say when.

In his appearance with Bush, Olmert reaffirmed his ideas for Israel's final borders: The major illegal Israeli Jewish settlement blocs on the West Bank where most of the 250,000 illegal Israeli settlers live would become part of Israel, with most other settlements dismantled.

A senior U.S. official said the administration became more comfortable with the unilateral alternative because it grew convinced Olmert was serious about trying to negotiate with Abbas. It also thinks that if efforts to negotiate fail, then Olmert's ideas could be compatible with the ultimate goal of a viable Palestinian state, even if the Palestinians had little hand in creating it, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was describing private talks.

The Palestinians are pressing for a full withdrawal from the West Bank and east Jerusalem.

In addition, Olmert's plan does not begin to tackle the complex issues that have doomed peace talks before, including the status of Jerusalem. Israel claims it as its capital; the Palestinians mark its eastern sector as the capital of their future state.

(Pledging allegiance to Israel and slavishly welcoming Master Olmert), the US House of Representatives voted Tuesday to ban U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority and to bar diplomatic contacts with Hamas. The Senate is considering a less restrictive bill. Bush opposes the legislation on the ground that it goes too far.


AP Diplomatic Correspondent Anne Gearan contributed to this report.

Earth, a planet hungry for peace

 Apartheid Wall

The Israeli Land-Grab Apartheid Wall built inside the Palestinian territories, here separating Abu Dis from occupied East Jerusalem. (IPC, 7/4/04).


The Israeli apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in the West Bank, like a Python (Alquds, 1/25/03.

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.